| Literature DB >> 35746441 |
Stephen J Dollery1, Janette M Harro2, Taralyn J Wiggins1, Brendan P Wille2, Peter C Kim2, John K Tobin1, Ruth V Bushnell1, Naomi J P E R Tasker1, David A MacLeod1, Gregory J Tobin1.
Abstract
Many microbes of concern to human health remain without vaccines. We have developed a whole-microbe inactivation technology that enables us to rapidly inactivate large quantities of a pathogen while retaining epitopes that were destroyed by previous inactivation methods. The method that we call UVC-MDP inactivation can be used to make whole-cell vaccines with increased potency. We and others are exploring the possibility of using improved irradiation-inactivation technologies to develop whole-cell vaccines for numerous antibiotic-resistant microbes. Here, we apply UVC-MDP to produce candidate MRSA vaccines which we test in a stringent tibia implant model of infection challenged with a virulent MSRA strain. We report high levels of clearance in the model and observe a pattern of protection that correlates with the immunogen protein profile used for vaccination.Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; biofilm; clearance; prosthetic implant; protection; staphylococcus; vaccine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35746441 PMCID: PMC9231243 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10060833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccines (Basel) ISSN: 2076-393X
Figure 1MRSA growth conditions yield unique protein profiles. Top: Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE of lysates. Bottom: key to numbered lanes providing details of growth parameters.
Figure 2UVC irradiation kills MRSA. (A) MDP has minimal impact on MRSA survival following UVC exposure: 100 µL vials of MRSA were exposed to UVC for the indicated times at 2 × 108 per tube and spotted onto LB-agar plates to observe residual colony formation activity. Each spot correlates with 2 × 106 CFU of bacteria prior to UVC treatment. (B) Quantitation of data shown in Panel A. Means with SEM are shown. (C) Bar graph showing CFU per mL from samples before and after 5 min of UVC exposure with MDP. Data are representative of >5 independent UVC exposure experiments (depending on the sample). 4 × 108 CFU equivalents were plated to check viability.
Figure 3MDP protects MRSA proteins during UVC irradiation. (A) MDP protects proteins from oxidation. Planktonic MRSA were prepared in PBS, Mn+ buffer, or with MDP and subjected to 5 min UVC exposure or not. Lysates were prepared and analyzed via either (left) Coomassie stain (concentration control) or (right) western blot for derivatized carbonyl groups (DNP). (B–D) Planktonic, synovial fluid or titanium drip culture preparations of M2 were irradiated for 5 min with MDP or buffer, lysed, and remaining epitopes were analyzed via western with anti-MRSA mouse sera raised against inactivated whole-cell planktonic MRSA.
Figure 4Infected-bone-implant model. (A) Mice were vaccinated on day 0 and boosted on day 21. Mice were challenged on day 42 and observed for 7 days post-challenge. CFU in the tibia following implant was determined per mg of bone. (B) Western blot of MRSA (planktonic) probed with sera from mouse groups (pre-challenge/post-boost). Lanes 1 and 2 were probed with sera from mice immunized with 16hr planktonic cultures. In Lanes 3–6, sera were probed with sera from single mice that were later shown to be protected in the following order; 3, M9 Biofilm; 4, Blood Biofilm; 5, Synovial Aggregate; 6, Titanium Biofilm. (C) Study 1 (9 mice per group); scatter plot of bacterial burden as CFUs per mg of bone from mice vaccinated with different whole-cell preparations and challenged. (D) Study 1; percent mice with a reduced burden of bacteria to lower than 104 CFU per mg bone. (E) Study 2 (10 mice per group); scatter plot of bacterial burden (CFUs per mg of bone) from mice vaccinated with different whole-cell preparations and then challenged. (F) Study 2; percent mice with a reduced burden of bacteria to lower than 104 CFU per mg bone. (G) Combined analysis Protection was significantly elevated for the Synovial Aggregate and Ti Biofilm (** indicates a Pearson’s Chi-squared test p-value of 0.002. * Indicates a Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test p-value of 0.03). Note: in A three mice were omitted prior to challenge, two from the PBS group, one from the Ti Biofilm group).