| Literature DB >> 35745924 |
Danish Iqbal1, Yintao Zhao1, Renhai Zhao1, Stephen J Russell2, Xin Ning1.
Abstract
Globally, developing countries require access to safe drinking water to support human health and facilitate long-term sustainable development, in which waste management and control are critical tasks. As the most plentiful, renewable biopolymer on earth, cellulose has significant utility in the delivery of potable water for human consumption. Herein, recent developments in the application of nanoscale cellulose and cellulose derivatives for water treatment are reviewed, with reference to the properties and structure of the material. The potential application of nanocellulose as a primary component for water treatment is linked to its high aspect ratio, high surface area, and the high number of hydroxyl groups available for molecular interaction with heavy metals, dyes, oil-water separation, and other chemical impurities. The ability of superhydrophobic nanocellulose-based textiles as functional fabrics is particularly acknowledged as designed structures for advanced water treatment systems. This review covers the adsorption of heavy metals and chemical impurities like dyes, oil-water separation, as well as nanocellulose and nanostructured derivative membranes, and superhydrophobic coatings, suitable for adsorbing chemical and biological pollutants, including microorganisms.Entities:
Keywords: Janus membrane; membrane technology; nanocellulose; superhydrophobic coating; water treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745924 PMCID: PMC9229312 DOI: 10.3390/polym14122343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Publications on nanocellulose regarding wastewater treatment over the last twenty years (ScienceDirect database).
Figure 2Structure of cellulose [13].
Figure 3Different types of nanocellulose.
Nanocellulose characteristics data from [21].
| Properties | CNFs | CNCs | BNCs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter (nm) | <100 | 1–100 | 20–100 |
| Length (nm) | Micrometer range | 5–200 | Micrometer range |
| Morphology | Long Chain | Rod/needle | Twisted ribbon |
| Tensile Modulus (GPa) | 100 | 130 | 80–110 |
| Tensile Strength (GPa) | 0.8–1.0 | 8–10 | 1.5–1.7 |
| Crystallinity (%) | 50–65 | 72–80 | 75–80 |
| Aspect Ratio | 60–100 | 10–50 | ~50 |
| Specific Surface Area (m2/g) | 51 | 533 | 125 |
Different Sources of Nanocellulose.
| Source of Nanocellulose | Reference | |
|---|---|---|
| Wood Feedstock | Hemlock | [ |
| fir, poplar, beech cherry wood | [ | |
| spruce | [ | |
| white cedar | [ | |
| pine, aspen | [ | |
| Armand pine | [ | |
| American elm, red maple, paper birch | [ | |
| eucalyptus wood | [ | |
| oak | [ | |
| Agricultural Residues and Plants | coconut shell, rice husk | [ |
| Miscanthus | [ | |
| rice Straw | [ | |
| hazelnut shell | [ | |
| switch grass | [ | |
| Napier grass, jute fiber, Bermuda grass, coffee pulp | [ | |
| elephant grass | [ | |
| orchard grass, esparto grass and timothy grass | [ | |
| oat straw | [ | |
| sugarcane bagasse | [ | |
| corn cobs, wheat straw, bamboo | [ | |
| sisal hemp | [ | |
| banana | [ | |
| soybean hulls | [ | |
| soybean straw | [ | |
| barley straw, sweet sorghum bagasse | [ | |
| cotton stalk | [ | |
| pineapple leaf, sunflower stalk | [ | |
| water hyacinth | [ | |
| Algae | algae | [ |
| bacteria | bacteria | [ |
| Waste | municipal solid waste | [ |
Figure 4CA determination on a solid surface [10].
Figure 5The Wenzel and Cassie wetting states are seen here on a rough surface [83,84].
Figure 6(a) A photograph of a lotus leaf floating on the water surface. (b) A SEM view of the lotus surface. The papilla structure is enhanced in the inset. Reprinted from [86]. Copyright 2005, with permission of RSC.
Figure 7(a) Measuring the CA of modified and unmodified microfibrillated cellulose aerogels (MFCAs) with concentrations of 1, 2, and 3 mL of methyltriethoxysilane. (b,c) Water/oil differentiation of modified MFCA and unmodified MFCA with 3 mL of methyltriethoxysilane showing that both water and oil are absorbed in the original MFCA, but only oil is absorbed in the modified MFCA. (d) MFCA that has been modified floats on water, but MFCA that has not been changed sinks into water. Reproduced with permission from Zhou et al. [93]. ACS publications copyright © 2016.
Adsorbent based on nanocellulose for the removal of heavy metals.
| Adsorbent Type | Targeted Heavy Metal | Production Method | Optimum Condition | Maximum Adsorption mg/g | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF with PEI | Cu (II) | TEMPO oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TOCNF) grafted with Polyethylenimine (PEI) | Room Temperature/pH 5–7 | 52.32 | [ |
| TEMPO-oxidized CNF | Cu (II) | TEMPO oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TOCNF) from beech pulp fibers were prepared by using 10 mmol/g | Room Temperature/pH 7 | 135 | [ |
| Carboxylated cellulose nanocrystal-sodium alginate (CCN-Alg) hydrogel beads | Pb (II) | CCN-Alg adsorbent material prepared from sodium alginate in CaCl2 solution. | Room Temperature/pH 5.2/Contact time 180 min | 338.98 | [ |
| Shape memory aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose(NFC) and polyethyleneimine(PEI) | Cu(II) and Pb(II) | NPAs of NFC and PEI manufactured in an easy and green method approach via electrostatic blend. | Room Temperature/pH 2~5 | 175.44 & 357.14, respectively | [ |
| Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) | Cr(III) & Cr(VI) | reinforcement using succination and amination | Room Temperature/pH 2.5~6.5 | Cr(III) (94.84%) and Cr(VI) (98.33%) | [ |
| Thiourea-functionalized magnetic ZnO/nanocellulose composite(TZFNC) | Pb (II) | TZFNC composite was manufactured by using a simple chemical | Room Temperature/pH 6.5/Contact time 14.5 min | 554.4 | [ |
| Surface functionalization of cellulose nano fibers by using methionine (Meth-CNF) | Hg (II) | CNFs extracted from rice straw were functionalized using l-methionine | Room Temperature/pH 7.8 | 131.86 | [ |
| CNC modified with NaNO2/NaHCO3 | Ni (II) | sawdust-derived cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) coagulant | Room Temperature/pH 7.10 | 956.6 | [ |
| CNC | Pb (II) | Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) from cassava peel by acid hydrolysis | Room Temperature/pH 6/Contact time 30 min | 6.4 | [ |
| NC-PEI/GA | As (v) | Nanocellulose cross-linking polyethyleneimine and glutaraldehyde. | Room Temperature/pH 3 | 255.19 | [ |
| CNC | Pb (II) | developed from agricultural waste | Room Temperature/pH 8/Contact time 70 min | 3.783 | [ |
| CNC/iron oxide nanorod composites | As (III) & As (V) | Acid catalyzed hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose | Room temperature/pH 5–9/Contact time 2 h | 13.87 | [ |
| Poly(acryloylhydrazide)-grafted CNC Fe–Cu alloy coated CNC | Cr(VI) & Pb(II) | Atom transfer radical polymerization Oxidation-reduction method | Room temperature/pH 3 | 45.7 & 81.94 | [ |
Figure 8TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibrils improved with PEI. Reprint from [114] Copyright 2016, with permission of Elsevier.
Dye Removal using Nanocellulose Based Adsorbents.
| Adsorbent Type | Targeted Dye | Production Method | Optimum Condition | Maximum Adsorption mg/g | Reusability | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carboxylated CNC | Methylene blue | Tempo oxidation | pH 9.0 | 769 | - | [ |
| Carboxylated CNCs | Methylene blue | Citric acid-hydrochloric acid hydrolysis | - | 92.80% | - | [ |
| Lignocellulosic Materials | Methylene blue | Neem oil-phenolic resin processed lignocellulosic materials | pH 2–8, time 5 min | 2000 | five cycles | [ |
| Cellulose Nanofibers (CNFs) | Crystal violet dyes | Nonsolvent- supported approach by applying Meldrum’s acid as an esterification agent | - | 3.984 | - | [ |
| dxe | Methylene blue | Triple-layered thin film composite nanofiltration membrane | - | 96.70% | - | [ |
| Microfribillated cellulose dialdehyde—chitosan composite | Congo red | Microcrystalline cellulose with high-pressure homogenization | Time 10 min | 152.5 | - | [ |
| TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers/TiO2 nanocomposite | Brilliant Blue | TEMPO-oxidation accompanied by precipitation | Temp 25 °C, pH 3–8, Time 5 to 240 min | 162 | - | [ |
| Sulphated CNCs | Auramine O | One-step ammonium persulphate oxidation | Temp 0 °C and 25 °C, Time 30 min | 20 | - | [ |
| Electrosterically stabilized nanocryltalline cellulose | Methylene blue | Two-step oxidation by periodate and chlorite | Temp 20–60 °C, pH 1–10, Time 1 h | 1250 | four cycles | [ |
| CNCs incorporated by Zno Nanoparticle | Methylene blue | One-pot Synthesis | Temp 25–45 °C, pH 2–10, Time 24 h | 64.9 | four cycles | [ |
| CNC-polydopamine composite | Methylene blue | self-polymerization | Temp 25 °C, pH 2–11, Time 24 h | 2066.7 | four cycles | [ |
| graphene oxide polymer aerogel/Magnetic BNC | Malachite Green | Combination of simple filler-loaded networks process with the aid of vacuum | Temp 5–45 °C, pH 2–12, Time 5–25 min | 270.2 | eight cycles | [ |
| CNC modified by Surfactant | Congo red | Sonication | At room temperature, pH 7.5, Time 2 h | 448 | five cycles | [ |
| Cellulose microcrystalline | Disperse yellow Dye | Surface modification | Temp 25 °C, pH 11, Time 10 min | 30 | - | [ |
| Sodium periodate-modified nanocellulose prepared from Eichhornia crassipes | Methylene Blue | A complicated chemical process | Temp 25 °C, pH 8.0, Time 1 h | 90.91 | Thirteen cycles | [ |
| Ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid embedded nanocellulose | Methylene Blue | Embedment method | Temp 30 °C, pH 10 | 98% | - | [ |
| Nanocellulose for immobilization of Laccase | malachite green and congo red | enzyme immobilization | Temp 50 °C, pH 5 for malachite green; pH 6 for congo red, | 92% for malachite green and | Eighteen cycles | [ |
Figure 9Illustration of a schematic and hypothetical interactions between graphene oxide nano-sheets, polyvinyl alcohol, bacterial cellulose nanofibers, and ferric oxide nanoparticles of magnetic bacterial cellulose nanofiber/graphene oxide polymer aerogel nanoparticles. Reprint from [150]. Copyright 2019, with permission of Elsevier.
Figure 10Pressure-driven membrane filtration classified according to pore size and pressure. Reprint from [157], Copyright 2020 with permission of John Wiley and Sons.
Oil-water separation through superhydrophobic nanocellulose-based materials.
| Separator Type | Production Method | Water Contact Angle | Separation Efficiency | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol) composite aerogels | chemical cross-linking, freeze drying, and silanization | 156.6° | 98.5% | [ |
| Holocellulose nanofibers | TEMPO-Mediated oxidation | 149° | 98.5% | [ |
| Cellulose nanocrystals/polyvinyl alcohol/tetraethyl orthosilicate aerogel | Freeze-drying method | 154.93° ± 4.14° | 92% | [ |
| Modification of wood and cotton fabric through Octadecylamine | Grafting | 168.2° | 97% | [ |
| CNF- polydimethylsiloxane | Freez drying method | 163.5° | 99.9% | [ |
Figure 11Janus cellulose membrane preparation by a facile method to enable switchable emulsion separation at the surface. Reprinted from [180]. Copyright 2019, with permission of ACS.
Figure 12Schematic depicts the preparation methods involved in Janus Cellulose Nanofiber Sponge. Reprinted from [183]. Copyright 2021, with permission of Elsevier.
Figure 13A diagram illustrating the procedures and materials used in the processing and functionalization of membranes. The process phases are as follows: (i) electrospinning of cellulose acetate (CA) mats, (ii) impregnation of CA mats, and (iii) drying and heating of impregnated mats. (a) The electrospun CA mat, (b) chitin nanocrystals (ChNC) utilized for impregnation (photo of the ChNC suspension, the AFM picture of the nanocrystals, and the chemical structure of chitin), and (c) the electrospun CA membrane mat formed after impregnation are exhibited. Reprinted from [188]. Copyright 2016, with permission of Elsevier.
Manufacturing Methods for Cellulose Nanopaper Production.
| Cellulose Based Nanopapers | Production Method | Targeted Materials | Adsorption Capacity (mg/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose Nanofibers | freeze-dried | Iron | 53 | [ |
| Ethanol phosphorylated TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils | Cellulose nanofibrils produced from fibre sludge | Ca (II) & Mg (II) | 90 & 70 respectively | [ |
| TEMPO-oxidised cellulose nanofibrils | sustainable biofuels manufacturing from green algae and cyanobacteria | Ca (II) | - | [ |
| Nanopaper prepared by carboxylated CNFs | - | metal ions | - | [ |
| Nanopaper made from pristine fibrous NC | - | filtration of viruses and nanoparticles | - | [ |