| Literature DB >> 35745734 |
Eric Rozenveld1, Nieko Punt1,2, Martijn van Faassen3, André P van Beek4, Daan J Touw1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with adrenal insufficiency are treated with oral hydrocortisone (HC) to compensate for the loss of endogenous cortisol production. Intrinsic imperfections of cortisol replacement strategies in mimicking normal cortisol secretion are the underlying cause of the increased morbidity and mortality of patients suffering from secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI). To improve oral hydrocortisone substitution therapy, a better understanding of its pharmacokinetics (PK) is necessary. The previous PK model did not include protein binding. It is known that protein binding can impact hydrocortisone pharmacokinetics. The aim of this study is to describe HC pharmacokinetics including the protein-binding state using Edsim++ (Mediware, Prague) pharmacokinetic modeling software, paving the way for an in-silico tool suitable for drug delivery design.Entities:
Keywords: CBG; Edsim++; hydrocortisone; hydrocortisone-protein binding; pharmacokinetic modeling; secondary adrenal insufficiency; transcortin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745734 PMCID: PMC9231005 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Parameters of the population model developed from our patient data (high dose and low dose), and the free fraction of hydrocortisone. Residual variability is 1.1 mg/mL (additive) and 9.5% (proportional). Shrinkage is shown in %.
| Parameter | New Model | CV (%) 2 | Shrinkage (%) | Old Model [ | CV (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V (L) | 405 | 55% | 1.9 | 474 | 54% | 0.11 |
| CL (L/h) | 226 | 51% | 1.1 | 236 | 46% | 0.67 |
| RC 1 | 0.13 | 85% | 19.8 | - | - | - |
| Spearman’s r (AUC24 for free versus total hydrocortisone) | 0.901 | - | 0.836 | - | <0.0000001 | |
| Confidence interval | 0.852 to 0.935 | - | 0.757 to 0.891 | - | ||
| <0.0001 | - | <0.0001 | - | |||
| N | 88 | - | 88 | - |
1 RC = ratio between CBGe (corticosteroid-binding globulin cleaved) and CBG. 2 CV (%) is the interindividual variation present in both our model and that of Werumeus-Buning.
Figure 1Simulation of free and total hydrocortisone plasma levels in a typical patient (weight; 70 kg, height; 1.75 m) receiving a dose of 10-5-2.5 mg of immediate-release HC at 7, 13 and 19 h. This figure shows the concentration of hydrocortisone that is bound to CBG and albumin (solid line, conc. bound—nM) and the concentration of hydrocortisone unbound (gray line) (conc. unbound—nM). Variable protein binding to CBG is also shown as a fraction (fraction unbound—dashed line, right axis).
Figure 2Goodness-of-fit plots of both population and individual parameters. This plot shows the agreement between observed and predicted concentration by model. Agreement is both visualized in the plots (red line as unity), as well as calculated using Spearman’s r correlation coefficient. Black color shows the total hydrocortisone concentration (bound to CBG and free). Grey shows the free hydrocortisone concentration. Spearman’s r for individual prediction is 0.999. Spearman’s r for population prediction is 0.954. (a) shows population prediction. (b) shows individual predictions.
Figure 3Weighted residual plots of both population (upper) and individual predictions (lower).
Figure 4Simulated example of desired therapy (thick black line) with endogenous cortisol (dashed line) and conventional therapy (black line). Typical patient (weight; 70 kg, height; 1.75 m) receiving a dose of 10-5-2.5 mg of immediate-release HC at 7, 13 and 19 h. The simulated curve has two hydrocortisone doses, one in the evening with a lag time of approx. 4 h (23:00 h), and one in the morning that has an extendedrelease profile (at 7:00 h). Evening dose is 9 mg and morning dose is 5 mg. Details on the characteristics of both doses can be found in the text.