| Literature DB >> 35745679 |
Syed Najmul Hejaz Azmi1, Wafa Mustafa Al Lawati1, Umaima Hamed Abdullah Al Hoqani2, Ekhlas Al Aufi1, Khalsa Al Hatmi1, Jumana Salim Al Zadjali1, Nafisur Rahman3, Mohd Nasir3, Habibur Rahman4, Shah A Khan5.
Abstract
A citric-acid-modified Moringa peregrina leaf substrate was prepared and studied as an effective adsorbent for the adsorptive removal of citalopram HBr (CTM). FTIR spectra were utilized to characterize the prepared solid. The effects of experimental variables on the percentage removal of citalopram HBr were investigated using response surface methodology. The optimum conditions selected for removal of CTM were 7 and 4 min, 0.17 g per 50 mL and 35 mg·L-1 for pH, contact time, adsorbent dose and initial concentration of CTM, respectively. Under the optimized experimental conditions, 82.59% CTM (35 mg·L-1) was removed. The Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, pseudo second-order kinetic model and diffusion-chemisorption model explained the adsorption data successfully. The maximum adsorption capacity at 298 K was 8.58 mg·g-1. A thermodynamic study illustrated that CTM adsorption was spontaneous and endothermic in nature.Entities:
Keywords: Freundlich isotherm; Langmuir isotherm; Moringa peregrina leaf; adsorbent; citalopram HBr; citric acid
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745679 PMCID: PMC9227232 DOI: 10.3390/ph15060760
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Infrared spectra of (a) Moringa peregrina biomass; (b) Moringa peregrina biomass treated with NaOH; (c) Moringa peregrina biomass treated with citric acid.
Figure 2Reaction sequence of modified cellulose derived from Moringa peregrina with citric acid.
Figure 3SEM images of (a) Moringa peregrina biomass and (b) Moringa peregrina biomass treated with citric acid.
Figure 4Effect of pH on the removal of CTM.
Box–Behnken design matrix data: experimental and predicted values.
| Experimental | A: Time (min) | B: pH | C: Adsorbent Dose (g) | Observed Response (%) | Predicted Response (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 11 | 0.02 | 19.00 | 19.27 |
| 2 | 4 | 7 | 0.17 | 82.59 | 82.59 |
| 3 | 7.5 | 7 | 0.32 | 72.84 | 72.84 |
| 4 | 0.5 | 11 | 0.17 | 53.09 | 53.08 |
| 5 | 0.5 | 3 | 0.17 | 24.32 | 24.29 |
| 6 | 4 | 7 | 0.17 | 82.59 | 82.59 |
| 7 | 7.5 | 11 | 0.17 | 56.72 | 56.97 |
| 8 | 4 | 11 | 0.32 | 70.13 | 70.13 |
| 9 | 4 | 3 | 0.02 | 7.87 | 7.85 |
| 10 | 4 | 3 | 0.32 | 28.23 | 28.25 |
| 11 | 0.5 | 7 | 0.32 | 59.75 | 59.76 |
| 12 | 7.5 | 7 | 0.02 | 29.89 | 29.89 |
| 13 | 4 | 7 | 0.17 | 82.59 | 82.59 |
| 14 | 4 | 7 | 0.17 | 82.59 | 82.59 |
| 15 | 0.5 | 7 | 0.02 | 31.22 | 31.23 |
| 16 | 4 | 7 | 0.17 | 82.59 | 82.59 |
| 17 | 7.5 | 3 | 0.17 | 32.47 | 32.47 |
Statistical data of the polynomial models.
| Model | SD | F | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Predicted R2 | PRESS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linear | 159.24 | 2.44 | 0.0189 | 0.2127 | 0.6767 | 0.4890 | 7.61 × 105 |
| Two-factor interaction | 167.90 | 0.14 | 0.1450 | 0.0185 | 0.6405 | −0.6754 | 2.450 × 106 |
| Quadratic | 13.73 | 6.40 × 108 | <0.0001 | 1.0000 | 0.9999 | 0.9999 | 1951.71 |
Figure 5Plot of the experimental run in different colors refer to Table 1: % observed response versus % predicted response (blue color showed lowest and red color showed highest % removal of citalopram).
Figure 6Response surface plots for the combined effects of (A) contact time and pH; (B) contact time and adsorbent dose; (C) pH and adsorbent dose on the % removal of citalopram.
Figure 7Desirability function-based profile: Optimized values of contact time (4 min), adsorbent dose (0.17 g), pH (7) and maximum % removal of CTM (82.59%).
Figure 8(a) Langmuir; (b) Freundlich; (c) Temkin; (d) Dubinin–Radushkevich adsorption isotherm plots for the adsorption of citalopram HBr onto citric-acid-modified Moringa peregrina leaf adsorbent at room temperature.
Parameters of various adsorption isotherms calculated using linear equations for adsorption of CTM onto citric-acid-modified Moringa peregrina leaf adsorbent at room temperature.
| Isotherm * | Parameters | R2 | Error Function (χ2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Langmuir | qe (mg·g−1) | 8.55 | 0.999 | 3.24 × 10−3 |
| KL (L·mg−1) | 0.08 | |||
| RL | 0.26 | |||
| Freundlich | qe (mg·g−1) | 8.41 | 0.996 | 3.77 × 10−2 |
| 1/n | 1.53 | |||
| Kf | 0.51 | |||
| Temkin | qe (mg·g−1) | 8.30 | 0.919 | 6.54 × 10−1 |
| AT (Lg−1) | 0.49 | |||
| BT (J·mol−1) | 7.56 | |||
| Dubinin–Radushkevich | qe (mg·g−1) | 8.20 | 0.926 | 1.04 |
| Kad (mol2·J−2) | −2 × 10−6 | |||
| E (kJ·mol−1) | −0.50 | |||
* Initial concentration of CTM: 35 mg·L−1; adsorbent dose: 0.17 g; pH: 7; contact time: 4 min; rotation per minutes: 120.
Figure 9(a) Pseudo-first order; (b) pseudo-second order; (c) intraparticle diffusion; (d) diffusion-chemisorption plots for adsorption of CTM onto citric-acid-modified Moringa peregrina leaf adsorbent at room temperature.
Kinetic parameters for adsorption of CTM onto citric-acid-modified Moringa peregrina leaf adsorbent at room temperature.
| Kinetic Model | Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudo first order | qe (mg·g−1) | k1 (min−1) | R2 |
| 2.59 | 0.63 | 0.9975 | |
| Pseudo second order | qe (mg·g−1) | k2 (g mg−1 min−1) | R2 |
| 8.50 | 0.69 | 0.9995 | |
| Intraparticle diffusion | Cid (mg·g−1) | Kid (mg·g−1 min−1/2) | R2 |
| 6.44 | 1.16 | 0.9810 | |
| Diffusion chemisorption | qe (mg·g−1) | Kdc (mg·g−1 min−1/2) | R2 |
| 8.50 | 98.04 | 0.9995 | |
Comparison of the performance of citric-acid-modified cellulose adsorbent derived from Moringa peregrina leaf with other adsorbents for the removal of CTM.
| Adsorbent | Contact Time (min) | Removal (%) | Adsorption Capacity (mg·g−1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper mill sludge pyrolyzed at 800 ℃ | 30 | - | 8.50 | [ |
| SDS-coated magnetic particles | 10 | 79.80 | - | [ |
| Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) | 10 | 26.30 | - | [ |
| Nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) | 10 | 31.41 | - | [ |
| rGO/nZVI | 10 | 47.90 | - | [ |
| # Porous alumina coated with natural zeolite | - | (i) 84.00 | - | [ |
| Citric-acid-modified cellulose adsorbent derived from | 4 | 82.59 | 8.58 | This work |
# (i) Spiked water; (ii) spiked surface water; (iii) spiked wastewater treatment plant effluent.
Independent variables and their levels used for the Box–Behnken design.
| Variables | Unit | Factor | Range and Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |||
| Contact time | minute | A | 0.50 | 4.00 | 7.50 |
| pH | B | 3.00 | 7.00 | 11.00 | |
| Adsorbent dose | g | C | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.32 |