| Literature DB >> 35745460 |
Muhammad Irfan1, Humaira Hussain2, Bisma Saleem3, Muhammad Saleem3, Shazia Shukrullah3, Stanislaw Legutko4, Jana Petrů5, Muhammad Yasin Naz3, Marek Pagáč5, Saifur Rahman1, Rehan Khan6.
Abstract
Zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles were loaded over non-thermal plasma (P1) and citric acid (P2)-functionalized cotton fabrics using a room temperature sonification process. The cotton samples were pretreated with dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma and citric acid to introduce some reactive moieties on the fabric to enhance the adhesion power of ZnO nanoparticles with an average particle size of 41 nm. The nanoparticles were dispersed homogeneously on the surface of the P1 sample, which enhanced the antibacterial, UV protection and photocatalytic self-cleaning characteristics of ZnO-loaded fabric. The self-cleaning efficiency of P1 and P2 samples was measured to be about 77% and 63%, respectively. The inhibition zones of 5.5 mm and 5.4 mm were produced by sample P1 against E. coli and S. aureusbacteria, respectively, which were slightly higher than the inhibition zones produced by sample P2. The inhibition zone of the samples roughly decreased by 17% after performing 10 wash cycles. The unloaded cotton fabric had a UPF value of 70.02 units and blocking percentage of 70.92% and 76.54% for UVA and UVB radiations, respectively. The UVA-blocking capacity of samples P1 and P2 was 95.27% and 91.22, respectively. Similarly, the UVB blocking capacity was 94.11% and 92.65%, respectively. The pre-coating plasma treatment was found to be helpful in improving the UV-blocking ability of ZnO-loaded cotton fabric.Entities:
Keywords: DBD plasma; UV protection; ZnO nanoparticles; antibacterial activity; cotton fabric; self-cleaning; sonification process
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745460 PMCID: PMC9228709 DOI: 10.3390/nano12122122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Illustration of DBD plasma system for activation of cotton fabric in open air.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of (a) raw cotton and (b) as-produced ZnO nanoparticles.
Figure 3UV-vis profile of as-produced ZnO nanoparticles before coating over cotton fabric.
Figure 4XRD spectra of (a) raw cotton and (b) as-produced ZnO nanoparticles before coating over cotton fabric.
Figure 5(a) SEM micrograph of as-produced ZnO, (b) STEM micrograph of as-produced ZnO, (c) SEM micrograph of ZnO-coated P1 sample and (d) SEM micrograph of ZnO-coated P2 sample.
Figure 6Mechanism of photocatalytic self-cleaning action of ZnO nanoparticles.
Figure 7UV-vis profiles of dye solution after different UV exposure times in the presence of (a) coated fabric sample P1 and (b) coated fabric sample P2.
Figure 8Linear fit of light absorbance by methylene blue dye solution.
Electrical resistivity and weight loss of ZnO-coated cotton.
| Sample | Electrical Resistivity (Ω-mm) | Fabric Weight (gsm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before Washing | After Washing | Before Washing | After Washing | |
| Control | 149 | 174 | 272.6 | 237.3 |
| P1 | 122 | 126 | 283.1 | 277.9 |
| P2 | 127 | 137 | 276.4 | 259.3 |
Figure 9Photographic view of inhibition zones of P1 (left) and P2 (right) samples against E. coli and S. aureus bacteria.
Inhibition zones of samples P1 and P2 against E. coli and S. aureus bacteria.
| Washing Cycles |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | |
| 0 | 5.5 mm | 5.2 mm | 5.4 mm | 5.3 mm |
| 10 | 4.6 mm | 4.2 mm | 4.5 mm | 4.4 mm |
Figure 10UVA and UVB blocking percentage values of unloaded and ZnO loaded P1 and P2 samples.