| Literature DB >> 35745400 |
Wenlei Zhang1, Hongwei Yin1, Zhichao Yu1, Xiaoxia Jia1, Jianguo Liang2, Gang Li1,3, Yan Li3, Kaiying Wang1,4.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted significant research interest for supercapacitor applications due to their high-tunable conductivity and their structure's pore size. In this work, we report a facile one-step hydrothermal method to synthesize nickel-based metal-organic frameworks (MOF) using organic linker 4,4'-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid (BPDC) for high-performance supercapacitors. The pore size of the Ni-BPDC-MOF nanostructure is tuned through different synthesization temperatures. Among them, the sample synthesized at 180 °C exhibits a nanoplate morphology with a specific surface area of 311.99 m2·g-1, a pore size distribution of 1-40 nm and an average diameter of ~29.2 nm. A high specific capacitance of 488 F·g-1 has been obtained at a current density of 1.0 A·g-1 in a 3 M KOH aqueous electrolyte. The electrode shows reliable cycling stability, with 85% retention after 2000 cycles. The hydrothermal process Ni-BPDC-MOF may provide a simple and efficient method to synthesize high-performance hybrid MOF composites for future electrochemical energy storage applications.Entities:
Keywords: 4,4′-biphenyl dicarboxylic acid; metal organic framework; nanoplate structure; one-step hydrothermal method; supercapacitors; tunable pore size
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745400 PMCID: PMC9227198 DOI: 10.3390/nano12122062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1(a) Synthetic scheme for the preparation of Ni-BPDC-MOF nanoplates. (b,c) SEM graphs of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample with different magnifications.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns of the Ni-BPDC-MOF and the pure BPDC samples. (b) FTIR spectrum of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample.
Figure 3XPS spectrum of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample. (a) Survey spectrum. (b–d) High resolution XPS spectrum of (b) Ni 2p, (c) C 1s and (d) O 1s.
Figure 4(a) TGA spectra of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample. (b) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curve of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample.
Figure 5Capacitance performances of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample. (a) CV curves at different scan rates. (b) GCD curves at different current densities. (c) Specific capacitances at different current densities. (d) Cyclic stability.
Figure 6Nyquist plots of the Ni-BPDC-MOF sample.
Comparison of the present work with previously reported BPDC-based MOFs for porosity and supercapacitive performance.
| Sample | Surface Area (m2·g−1) | Average Diameter (nm) | Electrolyte | Scan Rate (mV·s−1) | Current Density (A·g−1) | Capacitance | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-BPDC | 1137 | 4.2 | 6M KOH | 1 | — | 0.34 | 170 | [ |
| Al-BPDC | 415.2 | 18.5 | 6M KOH | — | 0.25 | 3.25 | 119 | [ |
| C-BPDC | 843 | 0.53 | 6M KOH | — | 1 | 1.23 | 256 | [ |
| Ni-BPDC | 347 | 32.7 | 6M KOH | — | 1 | 1.10 | 328 | [ |
| Ni-BPDC | — | — | 6M KOH | — | 1 | 0.65 | 432 | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|