| Literature DB >> 35745331 |
Lidia Mezzina1, Angelo Nicosia1, Giuseppe Antonio Baratta2, Maria Elisabetta Palumbo2, Carlotta Scirè2, Placido Giuseppe Mineo1,3.
Abstract
Space exploration missions are currently becoming more frequent, due to the ambition for space colonization in sight of strengthening terrestrial technologies and extracting new raw materials and/or resources. In this field, the study of the materials' behaviour when exposed to space conditions is fundamental for enabling the use of currently existing materials or the development of new materials suitable for application in extra-terrestrial environments. In particular, the versatility of polymers renders them suitable for advanced applications, but the effects of space radiation on these materials are not yet fully understood. Here, to shed light on the effects of simulated solar wind on a polymeric material, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) was produced through radical bulk polymerization. The PMMA in the form of a thin film was subjected to proton beam bombardment at different fluences and in a high vacuum environment, with structural changes monitored through real-time FT-IR analysis. The structure of the residual material was investigated through MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 1H-NMR spectroscopy. The collected data allowed us to hypothesize the structural modifications of the PMMA and the related mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: ion beam irradiation; polymer degradation pathway; polymethyl methacrylate; solar wind; space materials
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745331 PMCID: PMC9229547 DOI: 10.3390/nano12121992
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Simplified scheme of the apparatus for ion irradiation experiments.
Figure 2GPC, Refractive Index trace of PMMA.
Figure 3MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of pristine PMMA. The peaks are relative to chains terminated by disproportionation (“*”, MNa+; “#”, MK+) and by coupling mechanism ( “+”, MNa+; “•”, MK+).
Figure 4FT-IR spectra of a PMMA thin film at 10−7 mbar pressure and acquired after 0 (black line), 6 (red line), 25 (green line) and 30 (blue line) hours (room temperature).
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of PMMA thin film acquired during ion irradiation at different ion fluences: pristine PMMA (black line), after 1.3 × 1015 ions × cm−2 (green line) and after 9.6 × 1015 ions × cm−2 (red line) ion irradiation (200 keV H+).
Assignment of FT-IR bands in pristine PMMA.
| Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment |
|---|---|
| 2995 | α-CH3 asym. stretching; OCH3 asym. stretching |
| 2950 | α-CH3 sym. stretching; OCH3 sym. stretching; CH2 stretching |
| 2840 | CH2 stretching |
| 1730 | C=O stretching |
| 1486 | α-CH3 asym. bending |
| 1450 | CH2 bending |
| 1436 | O-CH3 sym. bending |
| 1386 | α-CH3 sym. bending |
| 1270–1240 | C-C-O stretching |
| 1190–1150 | C-O-C stretching |
| 1062 | C-C skeletal stretching |
| 988 | O-CH3 rocking |
| 840 | CH2 rocking |
| 750 | C-C skeletal stretching |
Figure 6(a) Variation of the normalized band area of -CH stretching (underlying area of the peak at 2950 cm−1, black) and C=O stretching signal (underlying area of the peak at 1730 cm−1, red) as a function of ion fluence. (b) Picture of PMMA thin film after the ion-beam irradiation. The red circle indicates the bombarded area.
Figure 7PMMA mass spectrum after bombardment with 200 keV H+ ion beam.
Table reassuming the repeating units’ composition of the bombarded PMMA.
| Peak | [M]Na+ | N(x,y,z) = 36 | N(x,y,z) = 37 | N(x,y,z) = 38 | N(x,y,z) = 39 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 3493 | M28,2,6 EG = H, IBN; | M33,4,0 EG = H, H | M30,5,3 EG = H, H | M27,6,6 EG = H, H |
| b | 3507 | M29,2,5 EG = H, IBN | M31,5,2 EG = H, H | M28,6,5 EG = H, H | |
| c | 3517 | M28,3,5EG = IBN, IBN | M30,6,2 EG = H, IBN | ||
| d | 3527 | M32,1,3 EG = H, H | M29,2,6 EG = H, H | ||
| e | 3535 | M31,2,3 EG = H, IBN | M28,3,6 EG = H, IBN | M33,5,0 EG = H, H | M30,6,3 EG = H, H |
| f | 3544 | M30,3,3 EG = IBN, IBN | M30,5,2 EG = IBN, IBN; | M27,6,5 EG = IBN, IBN; | |
| g | 3553 | M34,1,1, EG = H, H | M34,3,0 EG = H, H; | M31,4,3 EG = H, H | M28,5,6 EG = H, H |
| h | 3561 | M31,3,2 EG = IBN, IBN; M28,2,6 EG = IBN, IBN | M33,4,0 EG = H, IBN | M30,5,3 EG = H, IBN | M27,6,6 EG = H, IBN |
| i | 3573 | M32,3,1 EG = IBN, IBN | M29,4,4 EG = IBN, IBN | ||
| j | 3580 | M31,1,4 EG = H, IBN | M33,4,1 EG = H, H | M30,5,4 EG = H, H | |
| k | 3593 | M32,1,3 EG = H, IBN; | M29,2,6 EG = H, IBN | M34,4,0 EG = H, H | M31,5,3 EG = H, H |
| l | 3601 | M31,4,2 EG = IBN, IBN | M28,5,5 EG = IBN, IBN | ||
| m | 3608 | M33,1,2 EG = H, IBN; | M30,2,5 EG = H, IBN | M32,5,2 EG = H, H | |
| n | 3617 | M32,2,2 EG = IBN, IBN | M29,3,5 EG = IBN, IBN | M31,6,2 EG = H, IBN | |
| o | 3628 | M33,4,0 EG = IBN, IBN | M30,5,3 EG = IBN, IBN | M27,6,6 EG = IBN, IBN | |
| p | 3641 | M34,1,2 EG = H, H; | M31,2,5 EG = H, H | ||
| q | 3651 | M33,0,3 EG = H, IBN | M30,1,6 EG = H, IBN | M35,3,0 EG = H, H | M32,4,3 EG = H, H |
| r | 3656 | M32,0,5 EG = H, H | M32,5,1 EG = IBN, IBN | M29,6,4 EG = IBN, IBN | |
| s | 3666 | M34,0,2 EG = H, IBN | M31,1,5 EG = H, IBN | M33,4,2 EG = H, H | |
| t | 3677 | M30,0,6 EG = IBN, IBN | M35,2,0 EG = H, IBN | M32,3,3 EG = H, IBN | M29,4,6 EG = H, IBN |
| u | 3680 | M35,0,1 EG = H, IBN | M32,1,4 EG = H, IBN | M34,4,1 EG = H, H | |
| v | 3693 | M36,0,0 EG = H, IBN | M33,1,3 EG = H, IBN | M30,2,6 EG = H, IBN | M35,4,0 EG = H, H |
| w | 3709 | M31,0,6 EG = H, IBN | M36,2,0 EG = H, H | M33,3,3 EG = H, H |
N: N = total number (x + y + z) of repeating units inside the oligomeric species; x = number of MMA units; y = number of de-carboxymethylated units; z = number of de-methylated units. EG represents both -H and/or -IBN (isobutyronitrile) end-groups. * Species in brackets are related to pristine PMMA.
Scheme 1Schematic representation of the reactions occurring during the H+ ion-beam bombardment of PMMA.
Figure 81H-NMR spectra of irradiated PMMA, with the possible repeating unit structures (top).