| Literature DB >> 35745320 |
Zheng Wu1, Taosheng Xu1, Lujie Ruan2, Jingfei Guan2, Shihua Huang2, Xiaoping Dong3, Huamei Li2, Yanmin Jia4.
Abstract
Mechanical energy derived from friction is a kind of clean energy which is ubiquitous in nature. In this research, two-dimensional graphite carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is successfully applied to the conversion of nitrogen (N2) fixation through collecting the mechanical energy generated from the friction between a g-C3N4 catalyst and a stirring rod. At the stirring speed of 1000 r/min, the tribocatalytic ammonia radical (NH4+) generation rate of g-C3N4 can achieve 100.56 μmol·L-1·g-1·h-1 using methanol as a positive charge scavenger, which is 3.91 times higher than that without any scavengers. Meanwhile, ammonia is not generated without a catalyst or contact between the g-C3N4 catalyst and the stirring rod. The tribocatalytic effect originates from the friction between the g-C3N4 catalyst and the stirring rod which results in the charges transfer crossing the contact interface, then the positive and negative charges remain on the catalyst and the stirring rod respectively, which can further react with the substance dissolved in the reaction solution to achieve the conversion of N2 to ammonia. The effects of number and stirring speed of the rods on the performance of g-C3N4 tribocatalytic N2 fixation are further investigated. This excellent and efficient tribocatalysis can provide a potential avenue towards harvesting the mechanical energy in a natural environment.Entities:
Keywords: N2 fixation; ammonia generation; friction; g-C3N4; tribocatalysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745320 PMCID: PMC9227561 DOI: 10.3390/nano12121981
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1SEM image of g-C3N4.
Figure 2XRD patterns of g-C3N4.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of g-C3N4.
Figure 4XPS spectra of g-C3N4 sample: (a) survey, (b) C 1s, and (c) N 1s spectra.
Figure 5Tribocatalytic N2 fixation performance of g-C3N4 with the different scavengers.
Figure 6Tribocatalytic N2 fixation performance of g-C3N4 with the different kinds of rods or without catalyst.
Figure 7Tribocatalytic N2 fixation performance of g-C3N4 under the different stirring speed.
Figure 8Tribocatalytic N2 fixation performance of g-C3N4 with the different number of stirring rods.
Summary of ammonia fixation performance of different catalysts and different catalytic methods.
| Catalysts | Ammonia Generation Rate/μmol·L−1·g−1·h−1 | Nitrogen Source | Scavenger | Catalytic Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g-C3N4 | 100.56 | air | methanol | Tribocatalysis [this work] |
| g-C3N4 | 160 | air | methanol | Photocatalysis [ |
| P25 | 52 | N2 | water | Photocatalysis [ |
| BiOCl | 68.9 | N2 | methanol | Photocatalysis [ |
| FeS2/CeO2 | 90 | N2 | water | Photocatalysis [ |
| KTa0.5Nb0.5O3 | 13.2 | air | methanol | Piezocatalysis [ |
| Ag/Bi5O7I | 65.4 | air | water | Piezocatalysis [ |
Figure 9The schematic diagram for the tribocatalytic mechanism of g-C3N4.