| Literature DB >> 35745295 |
Minki Jo1, Soojin Sim2, Juhyeong Kim1, Pilgun Oh3,4, Yoonkook Son1.
Abstract
The electrode concept of graphite and silicon blending has recently been utilized as the anode in the current lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) industry, accompanying trials of improvement of cycling life in the commercial levels of electrode conditions, such as the areal capacity of approximately 3.3 mAh/cm2 and volumetric capacity of approximately 570 mAh/cm3. However, the blending concept has not been widely explored in the academic reports, which focused mainly on how much volume expansion of electrodes could be mitigated. Moreover, the limitations of the blending electrodes have not been studied in detail. Therefore, herein we investigate the graphite blending electrode with micron-sized SiOx anode material which is one of the most broadly used Si anode materials in the industry, to approach the commercial and practical view. Compared to the silicon micron particle blending electrode, the SiOx blending electrode showed superior cycling performance in the full cell test. To elucidate the cause of the relatively less degradation of the SiOx blending electrode as the cycling progressed in full-cell, the electrode level expansion and the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) thickening were analyzed with various techniques, such as SEM, TEM, XPS, and STEM-EDS. We believe that this work will reveal the electrochemical insight of practical SiOx-graphite electrodes and offer the key factors to reducing the gap between industry and academic demands for the next anode materials.Entities:
Keywords: SiOx; SiOx-graphite compound; anode materials; lithium-ion batteries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745295 PMCID: PMC9230857 DOI: 10.3390/nano12121956
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1(a) Particle size distribution of graphite, SiOx, and SiMPs. SEM images of (b) SiMPs and (c) SiOx.
Figure 2Half-cell formation voltage profiles of (a) SiMPs blending and (b) SiOx blending. Comparison of cycling performance of SiMPs blending and SiOx blending in (c) half-cell and (d) full-cell.
Figure 3Top-view SEM images of (a–c) SiMP blending and (d–f) SiOx blending electrodes in full-cell: (a) pristine, (b) after 250 cycles, (c) after 500 cycles, respectively.
Figure 4Cross-sectional TEM images of SiOx blending electrode after (a) 50 cycles, (b) 100 cycles, and (c) 250 cycles.
Figure 5XPS analysis of SiOx blending electrode after 5, 50, and 350 cycles from top to bottom.