Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production by the Sensitization of Sn(IV)-Porphyrin Embedded in a Nafion Matrix Coated on TiO2.

Efficient utilization of visible light for photocatalytic hydrogen production is one of the most important issues to address. This report describes a facile approach to immobilize visible-light sensitizers on TiO2 surfaces. To effectively utilize the sensitization of Sn(IV) porphyrin species for photocatalytic hydrogen production, perfluorosulfonate polymer (Nafion) matrix coated-TiO2 was fabricated. Nafion coated-TiO2 readily adsorbed trans-diaqua[meso-tetrakis(4-pyridinium)porphyrinato]tin(IV) cation [(TPyHP)Sn(OH2)2]6+ via an ion-exchange process. The uptake of [(TPyHP)Sn(OH2)2]6+ in an aqueous solution completed within 30 min, as determined by UV-vis spectroscopy. The existence of Sn(IV) porphyrin species embedded in the Nafion matrix coated on TiO2 was confirmed by zeta potential measurements, UV-vis absorption spectroscopy, TEM combined with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. Sn(IV)-porphyrin cationic species embedded in the Nafion matrix were successfully used as visible-light sensitizer for photochemical hydrogen generation. This photocatalytic system performed 45% better than the uncoated TiO2 system. In addition, the performance at pH 7 was superior to that at pH 3 or 9. This work revealed that Nafion matrix coated-TiO2 can efficiently produce hydrogen with a consistent performance by utilizing a freshly supplied cationic Sn(IV)-porphyrin sensitizer in a neutral solution.

1. Introduction

Photochemical generation of hydrogen has been intensively studied as a means of converting solar energy into chemical energy [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Solar energy is predominantly in the visible region, therefore, efficient utilization of visible light is one of the most important issues to address. During natural photosynthesis, the absorption of visible light by chlorophyll sensitizers initiates the light-harvesting process, followed by charge separation and transfer, which proceeds through redox reactions. Porphyrins and metalloporphyrins have been extensively explored in the context of light harvesting and photoinduced electron/energy transfer processes [7,8,9], because of their similarity to chlorophyll sensitizers in natural photosynthesis. They have also been extensively investigated for their photochemical properties in environmental photocatalysis [10], hydrogen production [11,12], and solar cell [13] applications.

Among the metalloporphyrins, Sn(IV)-porphyrin is particularly noteworthy as a photosensitizer or photocatalyst for the development of various photocatalytic systems. Sn(IV)-porphyrin has an intrinsically strong oxidation ability owing to the high charge of the Sn(IV) center; consequently, the excited state of SnP has a high affinity for electrons that initiate photooxidative reactions. The excited Sn(IV)-porphyrin exhibits a high photochemical activity for the oxidative degradation of organic pollutants under visible light [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Sn(IV)-porphyrin complex-based nanoparticles have been also used in photochemical hydrogen production [20]. A water-soluble Sn(IV)-porphyrin complex, trans-diaqua[meso-tetrakis(4-pyridinium)porphyrinato]tin(IV) hexanitrate [(TPyP)Sn(OH2)2](NO3)6, has been investigated as a visible light sensitizer of platinized TiO2 nanoparticles for the production of hydrogen [21]. Although the Sn(IV)-porphyrin sensitizer was not bound to TiO2, hydrogen was successfully generated under visible light over a wide pH range (pH 3–11). Efficient visible light sensitization generally requires strong chemical bonding between the semiconductor oxide (TiO2) and sensitizer molecule, which results in significant electronic coupling between the semiconductor conduction band and the sensitizer’s excited orbital. Therefore, molecular sensitizers with anchors such as carboxylate, phosphonate, and catechol groups are fixed on the surface of the semiconductor oxide [22,23,24]. In contrast, this study revealed that the sufficiently long lifetime of photogenerated π-radical anions of Sn(IV)-porphyrin (SnP•−) enables the diffusion of SnP•− to the TiO2 surface in the bulk solution. The disadvantage of the typical molecular dye-sensitized TiO2 system, in which the chemical modification of the sensitizer for anchoring is essential and the hydrogen production is limited to acidic conditions, was addressed in this system. However, the efficiency of the electron transfer between the porphyrin sensitizer and redox mediator remains to be improved.

An alternative method of immobilizing sensitizing molecules on the surface of TiO2 has been achieved using a polymer matrix [25,26]. Nafion, an anionic perfluorinated polymer, has hydrophilic pores (~4 nm) surrounded by sulfonate anion groups (−SO3−) capable of exchanging cationic species. Additionally, it is chemically and photochemically inert. [(TPyP)Sn(OH2)2]6+, which does not bind to the TiO2 surface, can be embedded into the Nafion-coated TiO2 surface through ion exchange, which facilitates more efficient production of hydrogen under visible light.

Unlike Ru-based sensitizers, Sn(IV)-porphyrins can be developed and used as practical sensitizers for solar energy conversion because they are inexpensive, have low toxicity, and are rich in certain elements. To improve the efficiency of visible-light-sensitive hydrogen generation using porphyrin sensitizers, we investigated a photocatalytic hydrogen generation system that incorporated Sn(IV)-porphyrin cations into a perfluorosulfonate polymer (Nafion) matrix coated on platinized TiO2 nanoparticles (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Illustration for the photochemical hydrogen generation by sensitization of Sn(IV)-porphyrin embedded in Nafion matrix coated on TiO2.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Fabrication of Photocatalyst

Scheme 2 illustrates the fabrication of photocatalysts used in this study. Platinized TiO2 nanoparticles (1) were prepared by the chemical reduction of H2PtCl6 with NaBH4. The TEM image, EDS spectrum, and elemental mapping images obtained by STEM showed the presence of Pt particles on the TiO2 surface (Figure S1). The Nafion polymer was easily coated onto the Pt-TiO2 surface by the drop-casting method using a commercial Nafion solution. Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2) was characterized by TEM, EDS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and FT-IR techniques. The EDS spectrum indicated the presence of F and S elements in the Nafion layer of 2 (Figure S2). The XPS spectra as shown in Figure 1 clearly confirmed the presence of F (1 s binding energy of 687 eV) in 2, but not in 1. The Ti 2p binding energies (464 and 458 eV) of both 2 and 1 were identical to those of pure TiO2. In the IR spectra comparing 2 and 1 (Figure S3), the C–F vibration band was observed at 1239 cm−1 only from 2 further supporting the presence of the Nafion layer. Therefore, all the characterization data prove the successful fabrication of 2.

Scheme 2

Fabrication of photocatalysts used in this study.

Figure 1

XPS spectra of platinized TiO2 (1) and Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2) in the Ti 2p (left) and F 1s band regions.

2.2. Embedding of Sn(IV)-Porphyrin Cations into Nafion-Coated Photocatalyst

The adsorption of ionic surfactant polymers, such as Nafion, on the TiO2 surface can modify the surface charge drastically. The zeta potential of suspended 2 at pH 7, −28.5 mV, was measured to be more negative than that of 1, −8.8 mV, indicating that the anionic character due to the coated Nafion layer was significantly manifested on the surface of particles of 1. 2 was expected to readily adsorb certain cationic species through an ion-exchange process in the Nafion matrix. The uptake of [(TPyP)Sn(OH2)2]6+ (SnP6+, water-soluble and highly charged Sn(IV)-porphyrin cation) by 2 suspended in an aqueous solution was monitored using UV-vis spectroscopy. Figure 2 shows that the absorption in the Soret band of SnP6+ decreased gradually, and the uptake was completed within 30 min. In contrast, 1 (uncoated Nafion polymer) did not adsorb SnP6+ at all, evident by the unchanged absorption spectra. The inset in Figure 2 also shows the uptake of SnP6+ quantitatively over time.

Figure 2

UV-vis absorption spectra of SnP6+ remaining after the equilibrated adsorption on Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2). The inset depicts the comparison of absorption changes in Soret bands of SnP6+ according to adsorption progress with time on 1 and 2.

Isolated 2 containing SnP6+ (3) was further characterized. In the zeta potential measurement, 3 showed +20.9 mV at pH 7, which strongly implies SnP6+ was sufficiently incorporated into the Nafion matrix of 2. In contrast, that of 1 was measured to be −14.5 mV when SnP6+ was present in aqueous solution, which indicates that 1 itself does not adsorb SnP6+ in aqueous solution. Figure 3 shows the UV-vis absorption spectra for each nanoparticle measured in the solid state. When compared to 1 and 2, the spectrum of 3 exhibited strong absorption bands from SnP6+ at 414, 511, and 550 nm in the visible light region. The TEM image and the EDS spectrum for 3 further proves the existence of key elements such as Sn, S, F, Pt, and Ti constituting 3 (Figure S4).

Figure 3

UV-vis absorption spectra of platinized TiO2 (1), Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2), and SnP6+-embedded Nafion/Pt-TiO2 (3) measured in solid state.

Finally, TGA measurements were taken to determine the content of SnP6+ in 3 (Figure 4). In the TGA diagram of [(TPyP)Sn(OH2)2](NO3)6, the removal of solvent molecules such as water occurred up to ~150 °C, decomposition of nitrate anions occurred at 200–350 °C, followed by the degradation of the Sn(IV)-porphyrin. In addition, the TGA plot of the Nafion sample showed that Nafion gradually lost water molecules and began to decompose rapidly at 300 °C, eventually losing 97 wt.% at 500 °C. 2 and 3 exhibited similar behavior in TGA, where the final plateau was achieved above 500 °C for both samples. Based on the difference of weight loss between 2 and 3, the content of SnP6+ was estimated to be about 2.4 wt.% in bulk 3.

Figure 4

TGA thermogram of SnP6+-embedded Nafion/Pt-TiO2 (3).

2.3. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation

Photocatalytic hydrogen generation was first investigated under visible light irradiation in an aqueous suspension containing 3 (2.4 wt.% of SnP6+, 1.5 g/L) as the photocatalyst and EDTA (1 mM) as the electron donor, but without an additional SnP6+ sensitizer. As shown in Figure 5, the amount of hydrogen generated continuously increased to 22 μmol after 4 h. It was clearly demonstrated that the SnP6+ species embedded in the Nafion matrix functioned successfully as a visible light sensitizer for photochemical hydrogen generation. The decrease in hydrogen production after 4 h may be due to the irreversible conversion of Sn(IV)-porphyrin to Sn(IV)-chlorin, a reduced form of the pyrrole ring [21].

Figure 5

Time profile of H2 production using the photocatalyst of SnP6+-embedded Nafion/Pt-TiO2 (3) in the absence of SnP6+ in the solution under visible light irradiation.

The effect of SnP6+ concentration on hydrogen generation in a suspension of 1 was examined, as displayed in Figure 6. While the amount of hydrogen generated was negligible at 0.01 mM concentration, increased remarkably as the concentration of the sensitizer increased to 0.1 mM. This means that the sensitizer in the solution must exceed a certain critical concentration to enter the Nafion matrix. On the other hand, at higher concentrations (0.5 and 1.0 mM), the hydrogen production increased sharply, but was prematurely saturated at approximately 30–45 min irradiation, and the amount produced was substantially less than that 0.1 mM concentration after further irradiation. This revealed that a large excess of the SnP6+ sensitizer can initially enhance the rate of incorporation into the Nafion matrix, but the surplus in solution has little effect on hydrogen production. Photocatalyst 2 itself does not contain SnP6+ sensitizer, so it is crucial to uptake SnP6+ sensitizer from solution at an initial stage. The uptake rate and efficiency probably depend on the concentration and mass transfer of SnP6+. Consequently, the optimal concentration of the SnP6+ sensitizer could efficiently incorporate the sensitizer into the Nafion matrix to subsequently promote photosensitized hydrogen generation.

Figure 6

Comparison of visible light-irradiated hydrogen production of Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2) by varying the concentration of SnP6+.

The adsorption of SnP6+ on TiO2 is not required for photocatalytic H2 production, hence, we further compared the performance of 2 with that of 1 in the presence of 0.1 mM SnP6+. As shown in Figure 7, 193 and 133 μmol of hydrogen were generated by the photocatalysts 2 and 1, respectively, after 2 h of irradiation. 2 exhibited a 45% better performance than uncoated TiO2. SnP6+ sensitizers embedded into the Nafion matrix coated on the surface of TiO2 facilitate the electron transfer process between the sensitizer and redox mediator (TiO2) when compared to free SnP6+ sensitizers in solution. The higher local concentration of H+ in the Nafion matrix also contributed significantly. The H+ population on the Nafion polymer-coated TiO2 surface increased considerably owing to the presence of the sulfonate groups in the Nafion polymer. It is well known that the pH of Nafion is much lower than that of the aqueous bulk phase. The protons trapped in the Nafion matrix of 2 could then be readily photochemically reduced to form hydrogen. Accordingly, the performance of 2 for the photocatalytic H2 generation was enhanced compared to that of 1.

Figure 7

Comparison of visible light-irradiated hydrogen production in the presence of 0.1 mM SnP6+ of platinized TiO2 (1) and Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2).

In a previous report [21], the unbound SnP6+-sensitized TiO2 system was found to successfully generate hydrogen under visible-light irradiation over a wide pH range (pH 3–11). Here, we investigated photocatalytic hydrogen generation with SnP6+-sensitized 2 at different pH values to evaluate the effect of pH on the performance and stability of the photocatalyst. Figure 8 shows the performance of H2 generation sensitized by SnP6+ in 2 at three different pH values (3, 7, and 9).

Figure 8

Comparison of visible light-irradiated hydrogen production of Nafion-coated Pt-TiO2 (2) at different pH values in the presence of 0.1 mM SnP6+.

The performance at pH 7 was superior to that at pH 3 or 9, where a similar performance was observed. At pH 3, hydrogen production gradually increased in the initial stage but almost ceased after 1 h. The photocatalytic production of hydrogen through the sensitization of Sn(IV)-porphyrin species is affected by the action of the corresponding π-radical anion species. Sn(IV)-chlorin, a reduced form of the pyrrole ring, is irreversibly formed by a bimolecular reaction between π-radical anions. The favorable formation of Sn(IV)-chlorin at an acidic pH inhibits the electron transfer process from the π-radical anions to the TiO2 or platinum catalyst, thereby reducing hydrogen production performance. It was also observed that the Nafion matrix coated on the TiO2 peeled off at pH 9 and above. This exfoliation can explain why hydrogen production under basic conditions did not increase as much as that at neutral pH over time. Therefore, it can be concluded that Nafion matrix coated-TiO2 can efficiently produce hydrogen with a consistent performance by utilizing a freshly supplied cationic Sn(IV)-porphyrin sensitizer in a neutral solution.

3. Materials and Methods

Trans-diaqua [5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-pyridinium)porphyrinato]tin(IV) hexanitrate, [(TPyHP)Sn(OH2)2](NO3)6, was prepared using a reported procedure [27]. TiO2 nanoparticles (Degussa P25) were used as received. Nafion was purchased from Aldrich as a 5 wt. % solution in a mixture of alcohol and water. Chloroplatinic acid (H2PtCl6·6H2O) (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), methanol (Aldrich), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, Aldrich) were used as received. HClO4 and NaOH were used to adjust the pH of aqueous suspensions. Ultrapure deionized water (18 MΩ⋅cm) and was prepared using the Barnstead purification system. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), TEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (TEM-EDS), and scanning transmission electron microscopy (S-TEM) images were obtained using a JEOL/JEM 2100 instrument. The zeta potentials of the catalyst particles in the aqueous suspension were measured using an electrophoretic light-scattering spectrophotometer (ELSZ-2, Otsuka, Osaka, Japan). The surface atomic composition was determined using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ULVAC-PHI/Quantera). UV-visible spectra were recorded using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-3600, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). FT-IR spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–400 cm−1 on a Bruker Vertex 80v. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out on a TA Instruments/Auto-TGA Q502 instrument heated from room temperature to 600 °C at a ramp rate of 5 °C/min under nitrogen.

3.1. Preparation of Photocatalyst

3.1.1. Platinized TiO2 (1)

A 2.0 g sample of TiO2 nanoparticles were immersed in water with 100 mL of H2PtCl6·H2O (0.1 M) while being continuously stirred for 2 h. Then, 50 mL of NaBH4 (1.0 M NaBH4 in methanol) was added quickly and stirred continuously for 2 h. The photocatalyst color changed from white to black with increasing Pt loading. The powder was washed repeatedly with distilled water. The suspension was centrifuged and decanted. The residue was then dried overnight at 90 °C, and this yielded (2.2 g of 1).

3.1.2. Nafion-Coated Pt-TiO2 (2)

An aliquot of Nafion solution (2 mL) in H2O/MeOH was added to 1 (1.0 g), and the mixture was mixed thoroughly. The suspension was centrifuged and decanted. The residue was washed with H2O/MeOH, and dried overnight at 90 °C, and this yielded (1.2 g of 2).

3.1.3. Sn(IV)-porphyrin cations-embedded Nafion/Pt-TiO2 (3)

An aliquot of 0.1 mL of a 1.0 mM [(TPyP)Sn(OH2)2](NO3)6 solution in H2O was added to 2 (0.1 g), and the reaction mixture was vigorously stirred for 1 h. The suspension was centrifuged and decanted. The residue was dried overnight at 90 °C, and this yielded (0.1 g of 3).

3.2. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation

2 (7.5 mg, 1.5 g/L) was suspended in an aqueous solution of SnP6+ (0.1 mM) and EDTA (1 mM) in a glass reactor (20 mL, Wheaton, Stoke-on-Trent, UK). The mixture was vigorously stirred for 1 h to immobilize SnP6+ on the Nafion layer. The suspension was purged with N2 for 1 h before illumination. A 150 W xenon arc lamp was used as the light source (LS 150, ABET-technologies, Milford, CT, USA). Light was passed through a 10-cm IR cut-off filter (λ > 900 nm, Edmund Optics, Barrington, IL, USA) and a UV cut-off filter (λ < 400 nm, Edmund Optics), and the headspace gas (15 mL) of the reactor was intermittently sampled and analyzed for hydrogen using a gas chromatograph (GC-2014, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).

4. Conclusions

Perfluorosulfonate polymer (Nafion) matrix coated-TiO2 was fabricated to effectively sensitize Sn(IV)-porphyrin species for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nafion coated-TiO2 readily adsorbed Sn(IV)-porphyrin cation species via an ion-exchange process. The presence of the Sn(IV)-porphyrin species embedded in the Nafion matrix coated on TiO2 was confirmed using various instrumental techniques. Our investigation revealed that the Sn(IV)-porphyrin cationic species embedded in the Nafion matrix successfully functioned as a visible-light sensitizer for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. This photocatalytic system performed 45% better than the uncoated TiO2 system. In addition, the performance at pH 7 is much better than that at pH 3 or 9. In conclusion, Nafion matrix coated-TiO2 can efficiently produce hydrogen through the favorable uptake of cationic Sn(IV)-porphyrin sensitizer in a neutral solution. Our work makes an important contribution in the development of nanostructured photocatalysts that are more efficient and practical than Ru-based sensitization for visible-light-sensitized hydrogen production.