| Literature DB >> 35744819 |
Jéssica Montenegro Santana da Silva1,2, Adriano de Souza Carolino1,3, Lilian Rodrigues de Oliveira1,3, Douglas de Souza Gonçalves3, Matheus Moraes Biondo1,2, Pedro Henrique Campelo4, Jaqueline de Araújo Bezerra5, Ştefan Ţălu6, Henrique Duarte da Fonseca Filho2,3,7, Hidembergue Ordozgoith da Frota2,3, Edgar Aparecido Sanches1,2,3.
Abstract
Poly(o-methoxyaniline) emeraldine-salt form (ES-POMA) was chemically synthesized using hydrochloric acid and subjected to a heat treatment (HT) process for 1 h at 100 °C (TT100) and 200 °C (TT200). The HT process promoted a progressive decrease in crystallinity. The Le Bail method revealed a decomposition from tetrameric to trimeric-folded chains after the HT process. The unheated POMA-ES presented a globular vesicular morphology with varied micrometric sizes. The heat treatment promoted a reduction in these globular structures, increasing the non-crystalline phase. The boundary length (S) and connectivity/Euler feature (χ) parameters were calculated from the SEM images, revealing that ES-POMA presented a wide distribution of heights. The TT100 and TT200 presented a narrow boundary distribution, suggesting smoother surfaces with smaller height variations. The UV-VIS analysis revealed that the transition at 343 nm (nonlocal π → π*) was more intense in the TT200 due to the electronic delocalization, which resulted from the reduced polymer chain caused by the HT process. In addition to the loss of conjugation, counter ion withdrawal reduced the ion-chain interaction, decreasing the local electron density. This result shows the influence of the chlorine counter ions on the peaks position related to the HOMO → LUMO transition, since the π → polaron transition occurs due to the creation of the energy states due to the presence of counter ions. Finally, the electrical conductivity decreased after the HT process from 1.4 × 10-4 S.cm-1 to 2.4 × 10-6 S.cm-1 as result of the polymer deprotonation/degradation. Thus, this paper proposed a systematic evaluation of the POMA molecular structure and crystallite size and shape after heat treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Le Bail method; XRD; heat treatment; poly(o-methoxyaniline)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744819 PMCID: PMC9231141 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27123693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1XRD patterns of the untreated (ES-POMA) and treated POMA at 100 °C (TT100) and 200 °C (TT200).
Figure 2Peak deconvolution of the XRD patterns of the (a) untreated and treated POMA at (b) 100 °C and (c) 200 °C.
Le Bail method performed for ES-POMA, TT100, and TT200 using the program Fullprof: cell parameters, average size, and anisotropy, crystallite apparent size and agreement factors.
| Refined Parameters | ES-POMA | TT100 | TT200 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.10275 | 7.06554 | 6.99176 | |
| 11.39338 | 11.42507 | 10.87043 | |
| 18.82489 | 15.58464 | 15.62562 | |
| 82.27626 | 84.71527 | 83.43137 | |
| 84.02425 | 85.33233 | 84.86502 | |
| 88.28839 | 90.64657 | 88.31005 | |
| V (Å3) | 1501 | 1248 | 1175 |
| Average Crystallite Size (anisotr.) (Å) | 29 (4) | 27 (5) | 23 (3) |
| Crystallite Apparent Size [100] (Å) | 37 | 31 | 27 |
| Crystallite Apparent Size [010] (Å) | 23 | 20 | 17 |
| Crystallite Apparent Size [001] (Å) | 34 | 29 | 26 |
| 3.59 | 3.92 | 3.96 | |
| 4.66 | 4.98 | 3.73 | |
|
| 1.13 | 1.11 | 1.12 |
Figure 3Crystallite shape from the Le Bail refinement of (a) ES-POMA, (b) TT100, and (c) TT200 samples along the directions [100], [010], [001].
Figure 4UV-VIS spectra of ES-POMA and TT200.
Figure 5SEM micrographs of the (a) untreated and treated samples, (b) TT100, and (c) TT200. The magnification is 15,000× and 100,000×.
Figure 6Two-dimensional zoom reconstruction of SEM images (100,000×) from (a) ES-POMA, (b) TT100, and (c) TT200. Representation of the (d) Minkowski surface and (e) Minkowski connectivity functions of images (a–c).
Figure 7Fractal dimensions calculated as (a) cube counting and (b) triangulation.
Figure 8Geometric optimization of doped-POMA (ES-POMA) tetramer, undoped-POMA tetramer, doped-POMA (ES-POMA) trimer, and undoped-POMA trimer.
Bond length of doped-POMA (ES-POMA) tetramer, undoped-POMA tetramer, doped-POMA (ES-POMA) trimer, and undoped-POMA trimer.
| Bond Length | Doped-POMA Tetramer (Å) | Undoped-POMA Tetramer (Å) | Undoped-POMA Trimer (Å) | Doped-POMA Trimer (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C–C | 1.39 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| C–N | 1.36 | 1.39 | 1.41 | 1.36 |
| C–O | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 |
| N–H | 1.04 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.04 |
| NH–Cl | 1.95 | - | - | 5.91 |
Binding energy (ΔE) and Gibbs free energy of binding (ΔG).
| Polymers | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|
| Doped (POMA tetramer/POMA trimer) | −186.37 | −178.90 |
| Undoped (POMA tetramer/POMA trimer) | −95.61 | −77.73 |
| Doped-POMA tetramer/Cl | −88.88 | −71.98 |
| Doped-POMA trimer/Cl | 6.82 | 25.42 |
Figure 9Theoretical UV-VIS spectra of doped-POMA (ES-POMA) tetramer, undoped-POMA tetramer, doped-POMA (ES-POMA) trimer and undoped-POMA trimer.
Wavelengths and electronic transitions of experimental and theoretical systems.
| Experimental | Theoretical | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trimer | Tetramer | Trimer | Trimer | Tetramer | Tetramer | ||||
| UV-VIS | UV-VIS (nm) | Trans. | UV-VIS (nm) | Trans. | UV-VIS (nm) | Trans. | UV-VIS (nm) | Trans. | |
| 272 | 272 | 290 | H − 1 > L + 2 (60%) | 280 | HOMO > L + 2 (71%) | 317 | HOMO > L + 18 (27%) | 310 | HOMO > L+2 (83%) |
| 343 | 343 | 317 | HOMO > L + 11 (43%) | 304 | HOMO > L + 1 (77%) | 345 | HOMO > L + 12 (37%) | 334 | HOMO > L + 1 (83%) |
| 428 | 433 | 354 | HOMO > L + 5 (60%) | 464 | H − 10 > LUMO (74%) | 369 | HOMO > L + 4 (70%) | 452 | H − 11 > LUMO (85%) |
| 526 | 526 | 419 | HOMO > LUMO (90%) | 586 | H − 8 > LUMO (84%) | 438 | HOMO > LUMO (87%) | 525 | H − 3 > LUMO (80%) |
| 780 | 810 | - | 710 | H − 1 > LUMO (63%) | - | 684 | H − 1 > LUMO (70%) | ||
| - | - | - | 847 | HOMO > LUMO (46%) | - | 936 | HOMO > LUMO (50%) | ||
Figure 10Gap energy and density of states (DOS/PDOS) of the (a) doped-POMA tetramer, (b) undoped-POMA tetramer, (c) undoped-POMA trimer, and (d) doped-POMA trimer.