| Literature DB >> 35744402 |
Xuemei Chen1,2, Jun Li1, Zhongyuan Lu1, Yunhui Niu1, Jun Jiang1, Yigang Xu2, Wen Zhong2.
Abstract
Brownmillerite-belite-sulfoaluminate clinker with different contents of brownmillerite were designed and successfully prepared by using limestone (LS), aluminum tailings (AT), aluminum mine (AM), and anhydrite (AH) calcined at 1330 °C for 30 min. Then, three kinds of brownmillerite-belite-sulfoaluminate cement (BBSC) were obtained by grinding mixtures of the clinker and AH. Hydration and mechanical performances of the prepared BBSC were thus intensively studied. The increase in brownmillerite in BBSC decreased the hydration exothermic rate and delayed the renewed rapid formation of AFt at early hydration stages. However, the formation of C2AS·8H2O would be promoted, where the higher the brownmillerite content in BBSC, the earlier the C2AS·8H2O formed. The increase in brownmillerite might change the morphologies of the formed AFt, grass-shaped AFt enriched in iron would be the main hydration products in BBSC with a higher content of brownmillerite. The increase in brownmillerite content contributed to the stability improvement in flexural strength and the stable growth in the compressive strength of BBSC. The appropriate content of brownmillerite (20 wt%) can balance the whole hydration reaction process, which was conducive to the development of BBSC mechanical strength, the decrease in the hydration heat release, and the volume stability of hardened pastes.Entities:
Keywords: brownmillerite-belite-sulfoaluminate cement; hydration; mechanical performance
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744402 PMCID: PMC9227356 DOI: 10.3390/ma15124344
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
The main chemical compositions of raw materials (wt%).
| Materials | Loss | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO | TiO2 | SO3 | ∑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | 43.37 | 1.03 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 54.13 | 0.44 | - | - | 99.39 |
| AT | 14.06 | 37.20 | 1.88 | 43.15 | 0.57 | 0.41 | - | 0.05 | 97.32 |
| AM | 9.70 | 39.18 | 24.46 | 19.74 | 1.69 | 0.60 | 3.87 | - | 99.24 |
| AH | 8.47 | 4.05 | 1.02 | 0.41 | 33.85 | 5.12 | - | 46.60 | 99.52 |
The mix design of the raw materials, theoretical clinker ratio value, and calculated mineral composition of the BBSC clinkers.
| Sample | Raw Materials (wt%) | Clinker Ratio Value | Main Minerals Composition (wt%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LS | AM | AH | AT | Cm | P | N | C4A3$ | C2S | C4AF | C$ | |
| GF-1 | 60.60 | 12.30 | 7.10 | 20.00 | 0.98 | 3.01 | 0.81 | 28.76 | 51.38 | 15.08 | 1.82 |
| GF-2 | 61.20 | 17.60 | 6.20 | 15.00 | 0.98 | 2.89 | 0.69 | 24.21 | 51.76 | 20.04 | 1.80 |
| GF-3 | 62.00 | 22.90 | 5.10 | 10.00 | 0.97 | 2.85 | 0.57 | 19.66 | 50.16 | 25.04 | 1.56 |
The ICSD of the main minerals in the BBSC clinkers and their hydration products in this study.
| Mineralogical Phase | ICSD |
|---|---|
| α-C2S | 81097 |
| β-C2S | 81096 |
| γ-C2S | 81095 |
| C4A3$ | 9560 |
| C4AF | 9197 |
| Perowskite | 62149 |
| C2AS | 87144 |
| Anhydrite | 16382 |
| Brownmillerite | 80869 |
| Portlandite | 15471 |
| Ettringite | 16045 |
| AFm | / |
| C2AS·8H2O | 69413 |
The main chemical compositions of the BBSC clinkers (wt%).
| Sample | Loss | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | TiO2 | SO3 | MgO | ∑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GF-1 | 0.26 | 17.85 | 16.67 | 6.17 | 50.89 | 1.55 | 4.43 | 1.81 | 99.63 |
| GF-2 | 0.36 | 17.50 | 16.06 | 7.09 | 51.04 | 1.79 | 3.81 | 1.51 | 99.16 |
| GF-3 | 0.46 | 17.34 | 14.89 | 8.97 | 51.18 | 1.83 | 3.17 | 1.61 | 99.45 |
Figure 1The morphology of the BBSC clinkers (inserts are the ESEM patterns).
Figure 2The QXRD patterns of the BBSC clinkers.
The main mineral compositions of the BBSC clinkers from the QXRD results (wt%).
| Sample | Theoretical Value | Calculated Value by QXRD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C4A3$ | C2S | C4AF | C$ | C4A3$ | C2S | Brownmillerite | |
| GF-1 | 28.76 | 51.38 | 15.08 | 1.82 | 27.71 | 54.82 | 14.71 |
| GF-2 | 24.21 | 51.76 | 20.04 | 1.80 | 24.87 | 52.04 | 19.14 |
| GF-3 | 19.66 | 50.16 | 25.04 | 1.56 | 21.05 | 50.55 | 24.28 |
Figure 3(a) The hydration heat flow and (b) total hydration heat of the BBSC.
Figure 4The XRD patterns of the BBSC hydration products: (a) GF-1, (b) GF-2, and (c) GF-3.
Figure 5The ESEM images of the BBSC pastes after curing for (a–c) 1 d, (d–f) 3 d, (g–i) 7 d, (j–l) 21 d, and (m–o) 28 d.
Figure 6The ESEM-EDS images of the BBSC paste.
The elemental structure of the cement paste.
| Sample | 1 d | 28 d | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | |
| GF-1 | 1.54 | 0.91 | 1.21 | 0.85 | 2.42 | 1.59 | 0.93 | 1.25 | 0.87 | 2.48 |
| GF-2 | 1.53 | 0.90 | 1.21 | 0.84 | 2.43 | 1.63 | 0.96 | 1.28 | 0.90 | 2.55 |
| GF-3 | 1.65 | 0.97 | 1.30 | 0.91 | 2.51 | 1.67 | 0.98 | 1.31 | 0.92 | 2.61 |
Figure 7The TG-DSC of sample GF-2.
The weight loss of the sample derived from the TG-DSC results (wt%).
| Sample | 100–200 °C | 400–500 °C | Residual Mass |
|---|---|---|---|
| GF-1-1d | −5.67 | −4.47 | 87.58 |
| GF-1-3d | −9.92 | −6.85 | 80.06 |
| GF-1-7d | −7.36 | −5.62 | 84.69 |
| GF-2-1d | −6.08 | −4.84 | 87.14 |
| GF-2-3d | −10.67 | −5.52 | 81.28 |
| GF-2-7d | −7.28 | −4.91 | 85.71 |
| GF-3-1d | −4.34 | −6.90 | 88.57 |
| GF-3-3d | −6.36 | −12.20 | 80.26 |
| GF-3-7d | −8.42 | −10.83 | 79.04 |
Figure 8(a) The flexural and (b) compressive strength of the BBSC mortars.