| Literature DB >> 35744293 |
Zhiyuan Su1, Qingguo Tang1,2, Weiwei Zhao1, Cong Liang1, Qian Liu1, Fei Wang1,2, Xinhui Duan1,2, Jinsheng Liang1,2.
Abstract
In this study, ball mill pretreated iron ore tailings were modified with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) and hexadecyltrimethoxysilane (HDTMS) to obtain iron ore tailings/polysiloxane (IOT/POS) superhydrophobic powders, which were subsequently mixed with chloroprene rubber solution (CRS) to prepare durable superhydrophobic composite coatings. The effect of HDTMS amount and reaction time on the wettability of the superhydrophobic powder was investigated. The influence of the superhydrophobic powders concentration on the wettability of the composite coatings as well as the degree of damage of the superhydrophobicity of the composite coating was analyzed by using the sandpaper abrasion and tape peeling tests. Further, SEM and FTIR were used to analyze the formation mechanism of the IOT/POS superhydrophobic powders and coatings. The results showed for an HDTMS amount of 2.5 mmol and reaction time of 4 h, the contact angle of the IOT/POS powder was 157.3 ± 0.6°, whereas the slide angle was determined to be 5.9 ± 0.8°. For an IOT/POS powder content of 0.06 g/mL in CRS, the contact angle value of the superhydrophobic composite coating was 159.2 ± 0.5°, whereas the slide angle value was 5.5 ± 0.8°. The superhydrophobic composite coating still maintained the superhydrophobicity after the sandpaper abrasion and tape peeling tests, which indicated the iron ore tailings solid waste has the potential to prepare superhydrophobic coatings.Entities:
Keywords: chloroprene rubber solution; iron ore tailings; superhydrophobic; wettability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744293 PMCID: PMC9229385 DOI: 10.3390/ma15124235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1The schematic of sandpaper abrasion and tape peeling tests. (a) Sandpaper abrasion test (b) tape peeling test.
Figure 2Variation of the wettability of the IOT/POS powders as a function of the HDTMS amount.
Figure 3Variation of the wettability of the IOT/POS powders with reaction time.
Figure 4Effect of IOT/POS powder concentration on wettability of composite coatings.
Figure 5(a) Variation of superhydrophobicity of the composite coating during the sand abrasion test and (b) the tape peeling test.
Polar and nonpolar sections of typical liquids.
| Typical Liquids | γl (mJ/m2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| diiodomethane | 50.8 | 0.0 | 50.8 |
| water | 21.8 | 51.0 | 72.8 |
Figure 6SEM images of IOT after ball milling (a) and SEM images of IOT/POS for a HDTMS amount of (b) 1.5 mmol and (c) 2.5 mmol.
Figure 7SEM images of composite coatings prepared with different concentration of IOT/POS powders: (a) 0 g/mL, (b) 0.02 g/mL, (c) 0.04 g/mL, (d) 0.06 g/mL, and (e) 0.08 g/mL.
Figure 8Profilometry results for the composite superhydrophobic coatings with 0.06 g/mL and 0.08 g/mL IOT/POS powders.
Figure 9Low and high-magnification SEM images of the composite superhydrophobic coating with 0.06 g/mL IOT/POS powders after 1000 cm wear distance abrasion (a,b).
Figure 10FTIR spectrum of IOT, IOT/POS and composite coating with 0.06 g/mL IOT/POS powders.
Figure 11The process of composite coating self-cleaning (a–c).