| Literature DB >> 35744129 |
Berdikulova Feruza1, Zharmenov Abdurassul1, Terlikbaeva Alma1, Sydykov Alimgazy1, Serikbayeva Akmaral1.
Abstract
Lead sludge from copper production is a source of rare metals, such as rhenium and osmium, whose content reaches 0.06-0.08% and 0.0025-0.0050%, respectively. The base of the sludge consists of lead sulfate. A method of reductive smelting of lead sludge from copper smelting production at 1000-1100 °C has been developed. Coke was used as a reducing agent and sodium sulfate as a slag-forming material. Optimal conditions for selective extraction of rare metals in smelting products were found: osmium in the form of metallic form into raw lead and rhenium in the form of perrhenate compound Na5ReO6 into sodium-sulfate slag. The developed technology makes it possible to extract rhenium with a high degree of extraction in the form of water-soluble compounds for the subsequent production of commercial salts of rhenium by the known hydrometallurgical methods. The content of rhenium in the slag phase is 0.18-0.25%, with its initial content in the slime of 0.06-0.08%. The degree of rhenium concentration at the first stage of processing is 3-3.2 times in the form of water-soluble perrhenate. Osmium and lead do not form solid solutions; osmium in crude lead is mainly concentrated in the lower zones of lead. A method of obtaining a concentrate containing 53-67% osmium from raw lead with an initial content of 0.0025-0.0050% in the slurry and a concentration number of 13,000-21,000 times has been proposed.Entities:
Keywords: black lead; lead sludge; metal recovery; osmium; rhenium; rhenium-containing slag
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744129 PMCID: PMC9227242 DOI: 10.3390/ma15124071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1X-ray of lead sludge.
Forms of lead in lead sludge.
| Lead Compounds | Mass Fraction, % |
|---|---|
| Pbgeneral | 62.12–63.56 |
| Pb (PbSO4) | 53.92–61.48 |
| Pb (PbS) | 0.05–0.23 |
| Pb (PbO) | 1.51–8.80 |
Figure 2Effect of consumption of sodium sulfate and coke on the degree of extraction of rhenium into slag.
Figure 3Effect of consumption of sodium sulfate and coke on the degree of extraction of osmium into the alloy.
Distribution of elements in the products of reduction smelting.
| Elements | Draft Lead | Slag | Sublimates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | II | I | II | I | II | |
| Pb | 98.5 | 95.6 | 0.05 | 1.2 | - | - |
| Cu | 0.467 | 81.7 | 0.009 | 0.66 | - | - |
| Zn | 0.085 | 22.67 | 0.026 | 4.74 | 5–6 | 72.58 |
| Na | 0.05 | 0.001 | 34.55 | 96.0 | - | - |
| Cd | 0.037 | 30.36 | 0.002 | 0.6 | 2–2.5 | 69.04 |
| As | 0.025 | 25.83 | 0.193 | 72.75 | 0.01 | 1.92 |
| Bi | 0.067 | 99.2 | 0.005 | - | - | - |
| Se | 0.1 | 35.36 | 0.03 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 63.54 |
| Hg | - | - | - | - | 20–50 | 99.4 |
| Os | 0.005 | 99.5 | <0.001 | - | - | - |
| Re | 0.0041 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 97.5 | - | - |
Note: I—mass content, %, II—degree of extraction, %.
Figure 4Thermogravimetric readings of lead sludge at 20–1000 °C with 40–85 °C change in sample mass: Δm1 = −1.50%, -H2O; at 85–155 °C; -Δm2= −1.75%, -H2O; at 155–240 °C—Δm3 = −4.25%, -CO2; -H2O; at 240–320 °C—Δm4 = +0.25% +O2; at 320–430 °C,—Δm5= −2.13%, -CO2; at 740–1000 °C—Δm6 = −14.62%—SO2, sublimation; at 20–1000 °C sample mass change in total Δm = −24.00%.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric readings of the charge 100 lead sludge: 30 sodium sulfates; 5 cokes at 20–1000 °C at 40–85 °C change in sample mass Δm1 = −5.87% -H2O; at 85–155 °C—Δm2 = −5% -H2O; at 155–240 °C—Δm3= −3.25% -CO2; -H2O; at 240–320 °C—Δm4 = 1.38 -CO2; -SO2; at 320–430 °C—Δm5 = −3.25% -CO2; at 740–1000 °C—Δm6= −18%—SO2, sublimation; and at 20–1000 °C sample mass change in total Δm= −36.75%.
Figure 6Diffraction pattern of sodium sulfate slag.
Results of microprobe elemental analysis of various phases of sodium sulfate slag, %.
| Elements | Phases | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Phase | 2-Phase | 3-Phase | 4-Phase | |
| Na | 26.48 | 5.54 | 2.40 | 0.92 |
| S | 20.79 | 4.65 | 0.81 | - |
| O | 41.13 | 24.46 | 19.63 | 12.63 |
| K | 0.98 | 6.23 | 8.37 | - |
| Re | 3.15 | 52.52 | 62.59 | - |
| Ca | 0.37 | - | 0.10 | 0.46 |
| Pb | 3.33 | 1.99 | 1.38 | 68.90 |
| As | - | - | - | 14.24 |
| Cl | 1.74 | - | - | 2.61 |
| Zn | - | 0.77 | 1.31 | - |
| Al | 0.63 | - | - | - |
| Si | 1.02 | - | - | - |
| Possible connections | Na2SO4, NaReO4, Na5ReO6 | KReO4, Pb(ReO4)2 | KReO4, NaReO4 | PbAsO4 |
Comparative data of technological indicators of rhenium and osmium extraction methods.
| No. | Processing Method | Technological Parameters | Disadvantages of the Method | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sludge leaching in the presence of an oxidizer. | Rhenium extraction in solution is 95–98%; osmium extraction in the gas phase is above 95%. | High consumption of expensive oxidizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide, obtaining productive rhenium solutions of complex composition containing such impurities as Pb, Cu, Zn, As, etc. | [ |
| 2 | Leaching of lead compounds with concentration of rare metals in insoluble residue. | Removal of lead sulfate in solution in the form of chloride or nitrate with a concentration of osmium and rhenium in an insoluble residue. The degree of concentration of osmium and rhenium is 20–30 times. | The consumption of solutions exceeds the weight of lead sludge by 3–5 times. Significant capital expenditures are required for the disposal of the obtained solutions. | [ |
| 3 | Oxidation firing. | Extraction of osmium and rhenium in the gas phase by 95–98% with subsequent concentration in subcarbon. | There is a joint transition of osmium and rhenium in the gas phase, requiring further separation. | [ |
| 4 | The method proposed by the authors. | Selective separation of osmium and rhenium at the first stage of processing. Extent of osmium extraction into blister lead—99.5%; rhenium into sodium slag—97.5%. | High temperature of 1100 °C. |
Chemical composition of various sections of the lead melt, %.
| No. Samples | Plots of Lead Melt | Mass, g | Pb | Cu | Zn | Bi | Os |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Upper | 124.5 | 94.2 | 1.278 | 0.196 | 0.0223 | - |
| Average | 75.5 | 96.7 | 0.421 | 0.0018 | 0.0673 | 0.002 | |
| Lower | 24.7 | 98.3 | 0.23 | 0.0008 | 0.0175 | 0.05 | |
| 2 | Upper | 126.6 | 94.3 | 1.190 | 0.1950 | 0.0221 | - |
| Average | 76.2 | 92.5 | 0.678 | 0.0009 | 0.0745 | 0.0008 | |
| Lower | 22.4 | 97.9 | 0.289 | 0.0008 | 0.0182 | 0.0590 | |
| 3 | Upper | 128.0 | 94.9 | 1.400 | 0.1870 | 0.0220 | - |
| Average | 78.11 | 97.2 | 0.028 | 0.00075 | 0.0712 | 0.0008 | |
| Lower | 19.64 | 98.5 | 0.22 | 0.0008 | 0.018 | 0.092 |
Note: total mass of the melt No. 1—224.7 g; No. 2—225.2 g; No. 3—225.75 g.
Results of microprobe elemental analysis of various phases of osmium concentrate, %.
| Elements | Phases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Phase | 2-Phase | 3-Phase | 4-Phase | 5-Phase | |
| Pb | 51.47 | 4.24 | 41.89 | 1.04 | 30.04 |
| Os | 8.95 | 74.96 | 22.51 | 82.15 | 37.4 |
| Ag | 4.75 | 1.30 | 2.2 | 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Se | 2.32 | 1.94 | 0.71 | 3.02 | 2.94 |
| As | - | 2.96 | - | 3.11 | - |
| Fe | 0.75 | - | 0.59 | - | 1.03 |
| Cr | - | 0.49 | 0.53 | - | 0.7 |
| Ca | 0.32 | - | - | - | - |
| Cl | 2.17 | - | 0.5 | - | 1.46 |
| S | 9.32 | 1.38 | 8.24 | - | 5.38 |
| Al | - | 2.21 | - | 0.75 | 0.41 |
| O | 19.84 | 10.52 | 22.83 | 5.21 | 14.71 |
| Possible connections | PbS, PbO, Ag2O, Os | PbO, Al2O3, Os, S | PbS, PbO, Ag2O, Os | Os, PbO, Ag2O, | PbS, PbO, Ag2O, Os |
Figure 7Microstructure and distribution density of elements in the concentrate.