| Literature DB >> 35743966 |
Andreea Stănuși1, Mihaela Ionescu2, Cristina Cerbulescu2, Sanda Mihaela Popescu3, Eugen Osiac4, Răzvan Mercuț5, Monica Scrieciu1, Roxana Maria Pascu1, Adrian Ştefan Stănuși1, Veronica Mercuț1.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Occlusal overloads produce a series of manifestations in teeth, especially attrition and non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) can highlight and evaluate tooth lesions. The aim of this study was to examine the changes of dental hard tissues in the cervical area because of occlusal overload by macroscopic examination and using in vitro Swept Source OCT examination. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: OCT; non-carious cervical lesion; occlusal overload; optical coherence tomography; tooth cracks
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743966 PMCID: PMC9231285 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) ISSN: 1010-660X Impact factor: 2.948
NCCL distribution according to tooth type and occlusal wear index.
| Lower Molars | Upper Molars | Lower | Upper | Total No of Teeth | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nr. of teeth included in study | 8 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 21 |
| Occlusal Smith and Knight tooth wear score 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| Occlusal Smith and Knight tooth wear score 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Occlusal Smith and Knight tooth wear score 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| NCCL | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
Figure 1PM1 examination: (a) macroscopic aspect of buccal surface; (b) 2D OCT image of buccal area with concave fissure; (c) 2D OCT image of buccal area with crack in dentin; (d) 2D OCT image of buccal area with cracks perpendicular to the bottom of NCCL; (e) 3D image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (f) 3D volume viewer image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (g) macroscopic aspect of mesial surface; (h) 2D OCT image of mesial area with crack in enamel.
Figure 2PM2 examination: (a) macroscopic aspect of buccal surface; (b) 2D OCT image of buccal area with crack at enamel–dentin junction; (c) 3D image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (d) 3D volume viewer image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (e) macroscopic aspect of oral surface; (f) 2D OCT image of oral area with crack at the enamel–dentin junction.
Figure 3m2 examination: (a) macroscopic aspect of buccal surface; (b) 2D OCT image of buccal area with crack at enamel–dentin junction and cracks of radial appearance in the enamel; (c) 3D image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (d) 3D volume viewer image of buccal surface in the cervical area; (e) macroscopic aspect of mesial surface; (f) 2D OCT image of mesial area with crack in cement.
Cervical lesions distribution according to occlusal wear score and affected surface (B = buccal, O = oral, M = mesial, D = distal).
| Occlusal Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Score | No of Teeth (%) | No of Cervical Lesions (%) | Total No of Cervical Lesions (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | O | M | D | |||
| Score 1 | 11 (52.38) | 21 (52.50) | 10 (66.67) | 10 (52.63) | 7 (50.00) | 48 (54.55) |
| Score 2 | 4 (19.05) | 6 (15.00) | 3 (20.00) | 4 (21.05) | 2 (14.29) | 15 (17.05) |
| Score 3 | 6 (28.57) | 13 (32.50) | 2 (13.33) | 5 (26.32) | 5 (35.71) | 25 (28.41) |
| Total | 21 (100) | 40 (100) | 15 (100) | 19 (100) | 14 (100) | 88 (100) |
Width of cracks on dental surfaces (mm), (B = buccal, O = oral, M = mesial, D = distal).
| Premolar | Molar | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Maximum | Minimum | Mean ± SD | Maximum | Minimum | |
| B | 0.050 ± 0.017 | 0.068 | 0.031 | 0.111 ± 0.151 | 0.489 | 0.020 |
| O | 0.254 ± 0.226 | 0.457 | 0.056 | 0.232 ± 0.158 | 0.421 | 0.035 |
| M | 0.160 ± 0.205 | 0.468 | 0.036 | 0.117 ± 0.136 | 0.390 | 0.020 |
| D | 0.050 ± 0.012 | 0.059 | 0.032 | 0.191 ± 0.193 | 0.487 | 0.031 |
Statistical results regarding the analysis of cracks’ width according to various groups of teeth (* Mann–Whitney U test; ** Kruskal–Wallis H test).
| Tooth Type | Tooth Position | NCCL | Tooth Wear | Crack Type | Crack Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crack width | U = 581 | U = 412 | U = 211.5 | χ2(3) = 10.205 | χ2(3) = 1.757 | χ2(4) = 11.008 |