| Literature DB >> 35743936 |
Alberto Galisteo1, Azucena González-Coloma1, Purificación Castillo2, María Fe Andrés1.
Abstract
The hydrolate byproduct resulting from the industrial essential oil extraction of Spanish purple garlic has been studied against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by in vitro and in vivo bioassays. The essential oil, the hydrolate and its organic fraction caused high mortality of juveniles, suppressed egg hatch, and reduced nematode infection and reproduction on tomato plants. The nematicidal compounds of garlic oil, diallyl disulfide and diallyl trisulfide, were the major components of the hydrolate organic fraction. These findings have important implications for the development of new nematode control products based on garlic hydrolate compounds and highlight the recovery of waste from essential oils extraction, promoting a circular economy.Entities:
Keywords: essential oil; garlic; hydrosol; nematicidal effects
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743936 PMCID: PMC9228356 DOI: 10.3390/life12060905
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Nematicidal effects of hydrolate (HD), hydrolate organic fraction (HD-OF) and essential oil (EO) from Allium sativum on second–stage juvenile (J2) of Meloidogyne javanica.
| Treatments | J2 Mortality (%) a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 h b | 48 h | 72 h | LC50 (95% CL) c | LC90 (95% CL) | |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 7.79 (7.23–7.97) d | 13.27 (12.63–14.03) |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.011 (0.010–0.011) e | 0.015 (0.0150–0.016) |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.012 (0.011–0.013) | 0.017(0.016–0.017) |
a Values (%) are means of four replicates. b Incubation time of treatments: undiluted hydrolate and hydrolate OF and essential oil at 1 mg/mL. c At least six concentrations/dilutions were used, at 72 h, to obtain LC50 and LC90. CL denotes confidence limit. d Values are % v HD/v water. e Values are mg OF/mL HD.
Effects of hydrolate organic fraction and essential oil from Allium sativum on Meloidogyne javanica egg hatching with time.
| Treatments | Hatched Juveniles and Relative Hatch Suppression Rate (%) * with Time ** | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | |||||
| 190.25 ± 6.52 ***,a | 368.75 ± 11.93 a | 571.5 ± 22.09 a | 114.5 ± 12.82 a | 12 ± 2.73 a | |||||
| 13.58 ± 3.92 b | 92.8 * | 33.74 ± 3.63 b | 90.8 | 2.28 ± 0.62 b | 99.6 | 1 ± 0.40 b | 0 b | 100 | |
| 22.25 ± 3.68 c | 88.3 | 50.15 ± 10.53 c | 86.4 | 86.86 ± 9.36 c | 84.8 | 21.31 ± 4.55 c | 2 ± 0.70 b | 83.5 | |
* Time 0: after 5 days of immersion in test solutions; time 7 and subsequent times: number of days of immersion in water after time 0. ** Values are mean ± standard error of hatched juveniles from three egg masses/four replicates. Values within the same column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different according to Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05). *** Each value represents the hatch inhibition rate in the respective treatment corrected according to the control.
Chemical composition of the hydrolate organic fraction and essential oil from Allium sativum analyzed by GC-MS.
| Compound | Rt | % Abundance | % Abundance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.99 | 18.22 | ||
| methyl 2-propenyl disulfide | 3.57 | 5.48 | 4.70 |
| diallyl disulfide | 6.09 | 31.31 | 27.44 |
| (E)-1-allyl-2-(prop-1-en-1-yl)disulfane | 6.51 | 2.15 | |
| methyl allyl trisulfide | 7.29 | 12.25 | 10.63 |
| 2-vinyl-4H-1,3-dithiine | 8.89 | 1.31 | 1.01 |
| 2-methyl-3-(methylthio) furan | 9.05 | 2.53 | |
| diallyl trisulfide | 10.81 | 26.58 | 16.82 |
Figure 1Major compounds in the organic fraction of hydrolate garlic.
In vivo effects of hydrolate and essential oil on reproductive traits of Meloidogyne javanica in tomato plants, 60 days post-inoculation, with 2000 eggs per plant, maintained in a growth chamber.
| Treatments | Egg Masses/Plant * | RS ** | Eggs/Plant | RS *** | IF **** | MR ***** |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 197.1 ± 20.3 a | 1411 ± 120 a | 0.09855 | 70.55 | ||
| 47.4 ± 6.2 c | 76 | 385 ± 86 c | 73 | 0.0237 | 19.25 | |
| 11.6 ± 1.5 d | 94 | 53 ± 10 d | 96 | 0.0058 | 2.65 | |
| 75 ± 5 b | 62 | 588 ± 67 b | 58 | 0.0375 | 29.4 | |
| 48 ± 5.1 c | 76 | 396 ± 70 c | 71 | 0.024 | 19.8 |
* Values are mean ± standard error of ten replicated plants. Values within the same column followed by different lower-case letters are significantly different according to Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05). ** Relative suppression on eggs masses per plant. *** Relative suppression on number of eggs per plant. **** Infection Frequency: egg masses per plant/egg inoculum. ***** Multiplication Rate: eggs per plant/egg inoculum.