| Literature DB >> 35743864 |
Qingshan Xu1, Qianqian Wei1,2, Yali Kong1, Lianfeng Zhu1, Wenhao Tian1, Jing Huang1, Lin Pan1,3, Qianyu Jin1, Junhua Zhang1, Chunquan Zhu1.
Abstract
Cold stress inhibits rice germination and seedling growth. Brassinolide (BR) plays key roles in plant growth, development, and stress responses. In this study, we explored the underlying mechanisms whereby BR helps alleviate cold stress in rice seedlings. BR application to the growth medium significantly increased seed germination and seedling growth of the early rice cultivar "Zhongzao 39" after three days of cold treatment. Specifically, BR significantly increased soluble protein and soluble sugar contents after three days of cold treatment. Moreover, BR stimulated the activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase; thereby alleviating cold-induced damage and increasing glutathione content and the GSH/GSSG ratio while concomitantly reducing H2O2 content. BR upregulated the expression levels of cold-response-related genes, including OsICE1, OsFer1, OsCOLD1, OsLti6a, OsSODB, OsMyb, and OsTERF2, and downregulated that of OsWRKY45, overall alleviating cold stress symptoms. Thus, BR not only upregulated cellular osmotic content and the antioxidant enzyme system to maintain the physiological balance of reactive oxygen species under cold but, additionally, it regulated the expression of cold-response-related genes to alleviate cold stress symptoms. These results provide a theoretical basis for rice breeding for cold resistance using young seedlings.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant enzymes; brassinolide; cold stress; gene regulation; osmotic substance; rice
Year: 2022 PMID: 35743864 PMCID: PMC9225285 DOI: 10.3390/life12060833
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Treatment and control group settings.
| Treatments | Temperature/°C | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 h | 12 h | ||
| W + H | Water | 30 | 20 |
| B + H | BR | 30 | 20 |
| W + L | Water | 15 | 10 |
| B + L | BR | 15 | 10 |
Note: “W + H” represents the seedling substrate without BR application or cold treatment (control), “B + H” represents the seedling substrate with BR application but without cold treatment, “W + L” represents the seedling substrate without BR application but with cold treatment, and “B + L” represents the seedling substrate with BR and cold treatment.
The effect of BR on germination parameters of rice seedlings exposed to contrasting temperature regimes.
| Treatments | Germination Potential (%) | Germination Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| W + H | 84.33 ± 0.57b | 90.33 ± 1.52b |
| B + H | 90.33 ± 1.52a | 97.33 ± 0.57a |
| W + L | 79.66 ± 2.88c | 87.66 ± 0.57c |
| B + L | 83.66 ± 1.52b | 89.33 ± 0.57bc |
Note: “W + H” represents the seedling substrate without BR application or cold treatment (control), “B + H” represents the seedling substrate with BR application but without cold treatment, “W + L” represents the seedling substrate without BR application but with cold treatment, and “B + L” represents the seedling substrate with BR and cold treatment application. Different letters in the tables indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05).
The impact of BR on growth parameters of rice seedlings exposed to different temperatures.
| Treatments | Plant Height (cm) | Plant Weight | Leaf Age (d) | Root Number | Shoot Width (cm/10 Plants) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W + H | 22.10 ± 0.33a | 1.22 ± 0.02b | 2.13 ± 0.08a | 5.88 ± 0.32a | 1.48 ± 0.02b |
| B + H | 21.95 ± 0.64a | 1.23 ± 0.03b | 2.19 ± 0.04a | 5.74 ± 0.25a | 1.58 ± 0.02a |
| W + L | 18.02 ± 0.15c | 1.21 ± 0.02b | 1.94 ± 0.00b | 4.85 ± 0.20b | 1.43 ± 0.02c |
| B + L | 18.76 ± 0.05b | 1.28 ± 0.01a | 1.92 ± 0.01b | 5.55 ± 0.04a | 1.46 ± 0.01bc |
Note: “W + H” represents the seedling substrate without BR application or cold treatment (control), “B + H” represents the seedling substrate with BR application but without cold treatment, “W + L” represents the seedling substrate without BR application but with cold treatment, and “B + L” represents the seedling substrate with BR and cold treatment application. Different letters in the tables indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The effect of BR on soluble protein and soluble sugar contents in rice seedlings exposed to contrasting temperature regimes. Different letters in the figures indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05). (A) Soluble protein content of rice seedlings under different treatments, (B) Soluble sugar content of rice seedlings under different treatments.
The effect of BR on H2O2 content and antioxidant enzyme activity in rice seedlings exposed to contrasting temperature regimes.
| Treatments | H2O2 | SOD | POD | APX | CAT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W + H | 10.38 ± 0.33ab | 654.42 ± 27.97b | 4385.39 ± 24.50a | 5333.04 ± 276.17a | 332.37 ± 1.60c |
| B + H | 8.18 ± 0.76c | 637.73 ± 9.92b | 3814.92 ± 52.51b | 4272.29 ± 224.86b | 342.25 ± 9.01bc |
| W + L | 10.87 ± 0.35a | 590.49 ± 13.84c | 3756.26 ± 109.20b | 3559.40 ± 11.59c | 355.94 ± 2.31b |
| B + L | 9.64 ± 0.84b | 698.39 ± 11.16a | 4157.98 ± 278.11a | 4402.12 ± 311.14b | 432.07 ± 13.41a |
Note: “W + H” represents the seedling substrate without BR application or cold treatment (control), “B + H” represents the seedling substrate with BR application but without cold treatment, “W + L” represents the seedling substrate without BR application but with cold treatment, and “B + L” represents the seedling substrate with BR and cold treatment application. Different letters in the tables indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05).
Figure 2The effect of BR on the ascorbic acid-glutathione oxidative system in rice seedlings exposed to contrasting temperature regimes. Different letters in the figures indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05). (A) GSH content of rice seedlings under different treatments, (B) GSSH content of rice seedlings under different treatments, (C) GSH/GSSH ratio of rice seedlings under different treatments, (D) AsA content of rice seedlings under different treatments, (E) DHA content of rice seedlings under different treatments, (F) AsA/DHA ratio of rice seedlings under different treatments.
Figure 3The effect of BR on relative expression of cold-resistance genes in rice seedlings exposed to contrasting temperature regimes. Different letters in the figures indicate that the differences between treatment means were significant (p < 0.05). (A) Relative expression of OsICE1 in rice seedlings under different treatments, (B) Relative expression of OsFer in rice seedlings under different treatments, (C) Relative expression of OsCOLD1 in rice seedlings under different treatments, (D) Relative expression of OsLti6a in rice seedlings under different treatments, (E) Relative expression of OsLti6b in rice seedlings under different treatments, (F) Relative expression of OsSODB in rice seedlings under different treatments, (G) Relative expression of TERF2 in rice seedlings under different treatments, (H) Relative expression of OsMyb in rice seedlings under different treatments, (I) Relative expression of OsWRKY45 in rice seedlings under different treatments.
Figure 4A model showing the alleviation of cold stress symptoms in rice by BR.