| Literature DB >> 35742954 |
Rolf Schreckenberg1, Annemarie Wolf1, Tamara Szabados2,3, Kamilla Gömöri2,3, István Adorján Szabó2, Gergely Ágoston2, Gábor Brenner3,4, Péter Bencsik2,3, Péter Ferdinandy3,4, Rainer Schulz1, Klaus-Dieter Schlüter1.
Abstract
Hypoxia upregulates PCSK9 expression in the heart, and PCSK9 affects the function of myocytes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PCSK9 on reperfusion injury in rats and mice fed normal or high-fat diets. Either the genetic knockout of PCSK9 (mice) or the antagonism of circulating PCSK9 via Pep2-8 (mice and rats) was used. Isolated perfused hearts were exposed to 45 min of ischemia followed by 120 min of reperfusion. In vivo, mice were fed normal or high-fat diets (2% cholesterol) for eight weeks prior to coronary artery occlusion (45 min of ischemia) and reperfusion (120 min). Ischemia/reperfusion upregulates PCSK9 expression (rats and mice) and releases it into the perfusate. The inhibition of extracellular PCSK9 does not affect infarct sizes or functional recovery. However, genetic deletion largely reduces infarct size and improves post-ischemic recovery in mice ex vivo but not in vivo. A high-fat diet reduced the survival rate during ischemia and reperfusion, but in a PCSK9-independent manner that was associated with increased plasma matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)9 activity. PCSK9 deletion, but not the inhibition of extracellular PCSK9, reduces infarct sizes in ex vivo hearts, but this effect is overridden in vivo by factors such as MMP9.Entities:
Keywords: MMP9; cardioprotection; ischemia/reperfusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742954 PMCID: PMC9223354 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Expression, secretion and effect of PCSK9 on reperfusion injury in rat hearts. (A) Rat hearts were exposed to 30, 45 and 60 min of ischemia and 120 min of reperfusion (I/R). PCSK9 mRNA expressions of left ventricles were analyzed (n = 8 each; p = 0.026 for Kruskal–Wallis Test; a; p = 0.010 vs. 30 min (Bonferroni test with correction for multiple testing). (B) Rat hearts were exposed to 45 min of ischemia, and PCSK9 protein was quantified in the perfusate (n = 8 each; a, p = 0.009 vs. Rep. 1; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples). (C) PCSK9 mRNA expressions of the left ventricles of sham operated rats (C) or rats exposed to 45 min of ischemia and reperfusion (I/R). Recovery was analyzed after 1, 3 and 7 days (n = 5 each; a; p = 0.028 I/R vs. (C); b; p = 0.076 I/R vs. (C); c; p = 0.209 I/R vs. (C); data are full ranges (whiskers) with median and 25 and 75% quartiles (boxes).
Figure 2Effect of PCSK9 inhibition on post-ischemic recovery. (A) Effect of Pep2-8 (10 µM, striated bars) on heart rate (HR), left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and rate pressure product (RPP) in the pre-ischemic period (n = 4 each; a; p = 0.738 vs. pre-treatment; b; p = 0.002 vs. pre-treatment; c; p = 0.018 vs. pre-treatment; Student’s t-test for paired samples). (B) Effect of Pep2-8 on left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) after 120 min of reperfusion, expressed as % of pre-ischemic values; p = 0.728 vs. control; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples. (C) Effect of Pep2-8 on infarct size (left original registration, right quantification (p = 0.215 vs. control; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples). (D) Effect of Pep2-8 on heart weight to body weight ratio (p = 0.923 vs. control; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples). Data are full ranges (whiskers) with median and 25 and 75% quartiles (boxes).
Figure 3Expression and effect of PCSK9 inhibition on reperfusion injury in mouse hearts. (A) Expression of PCSK9 mRNA in the left ventricles of normoxic controls (n = 10) and mouse hearts exposed to ischemia/reperfusion (n = 8); a, p = 0.008 vs. control; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples. (B) Effect of Pep2-8 and genetic deletion of PCSK9 on left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) expressed as % recovery of pre-ischemic values. One-Way ANOVA p = 0.001; Student–Newman–Keuls indicated groups between knockout and Pep2-8 vs. wild-type controls as indicated by letters. (C) Effect of Pep2-8 and genetic deletion of PCSK9 on infarct sizes with original registration on left and quantification on right; 1-Way ANOVA p = 0.003; Student–Newman–Keuls indicated groups between knockout and Pep2-8 vs. wild-type controls as indicated by letters (a,b). (n = 5 each). (D) Effect of Pep2-8 and genetic deletion of PCSK9 on heart weight to body weight ratio; 1-Way ANOVA p = 0.043; Student–Newman–Keuls indicated groups between knockout and Pep2-8 vs. knockouts as indicated by letters.; n = 10 each. Data are full ranges (whiskers) with median and 25 and 75% quartiles (boxes).
Figure 4Effect of PCSK9 genetic deletion and high-fat diet on serum PCSK9 levels and infarct sizes in vivo. (A) Effect of high-fat diet (HFD, n = 30) on serum PCSK9 levels compared to normal diet (ND, n = 8); a; p = 0.003; Student’s t-test for unpaired samples. Non different groups are indicated by identical letters (a,b). (B) Inarct sizes (IS) normalized to area of risk (AAR) analyzed using 1-Way ANOVA (p = 0.949) and 2-Way ANOVA (p = 0.951 for genotype; p = 0.892 for diet; p = 0.587 for interaction; HFD: n = 10 each; ND: n = 6 each. (C) Infarct sizes measured as troponin I release in serum samples analyzed using 1-Way ANOVA (p = 0.022) and 2-Way ANOVA with p = 0.330 for genotype, p = 0.003 for diet, and p = 0.646 for interaction; ND: n = 8 (wild-type) and n = 9 (knockout); HFD: n = 6 (wild type) and n = 5 (knockout). Data are full ranges (whiskers) with median and 25 and 75% quartiles (boxes).
Figure 5Effect of PCSK9 and high-fat diet (HFD, n = 21) on survival, PCSK9 serum levels and MMP9 activity. (A) Percent survival of the different groups. (B) Survival curve for high-fat diet mice during ischemia and reperfusion. Kaplan–Meier analysis p = 0.497 (Log-Rank Test). (C) Plasma levels in HFD mice and comparison between survivors (s; n = 6) and non-survivors (ns; n = 14; p = 0.953). (D) MMP9 activity in serum samples from mice as indicated; 1-Way ANOVA: a vs. b; p = 0.0001; 2-Way-ANOAV: p = 0.0001 for survival; p = 0.726 for genotype; p = 0.404 for interaction; survivors (s; n = 6 each); non-survivors (ns; n = 14 PCSK9+/+ and n = 15 PCSK9−/−). Data are full ranges (whiskers) with median and 25 and 75% quartiles (boxes).
Composition of the mouse chow.
| Dry matter | % | 88 |
| Crude protein | % | 22.04 |
| Crude fat | % | 3.35 |
| Crude fiber | % | 6.34 |
| Crude ash | % | 9.31 |
| Lyisine | % | 0.99 |
| Methionine | % | 0.4 |
| Methionine + cystine | % | 0.78 |
| Calcium | % | 0.81 |
| Phosphorous | % | 0.66 |
| Sodium | % | 0.17 |
| Vitamin A | IU/kg | 12,250 |
| Vitamin D3 | IU/kg | 1800 |
| Vitamin E | mg/kg | 61 |
The chow was complemented with 2% cholesterol and 0.5% cholic acid.
List of primers used in this study.
| Gene | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
|
| GCTATCCAGAAAACCCCTCAA | CATGTCTCGATCCCAGTAGACGGT |
|
| ACGGCACAGTCAAGGCCGAG | CACCCTTCAAGTGGGCCCCG |
|
| CCA GCG TCG TGA TTA GCG AT | CAA GTC TTT CAG TCC TGT CC |
|
| CACCATGGGCACCGTCAGCTCCAG | AAACTGGAGCTCCTGGGAGGCC |