| Literature DB >> 35742758 |
Cristina F Alistar1, Ionela C Nica1,2, Mihai Nita-Lazar3, Gabriela Geanina Vasile3, Stefania Gheorghe3, Alexa-Maria Croitoru4,5,6, Georgiana Dolete4,5,6, Dan Eduard Mihaiescu4,5,6,7, Anton Ficai4,5,6,7, Nicolai Craciun1, Gratiela Gradisteanu Pircalabioru2,7,8, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc2,7,8, Miruna S Stan1,2, Anca Dinischiotu1.
Abstract
Fish are able to accumulate by ingestion various contaminants of aquatic environment, with negative consequences on their intestine, being continuously threatened worldwide by heavy metals, pesticides and antibiotics resulted from the human activities. Consequently, the health of other species can be affected by eating the contaminated fish meat. In this context, our study aimed to perform a comparison between the changes in intestine samples of Carassius gibelio individuals collected from different artificial lakes in Bucharest (Romania), used by people for leisure and fishing. The presence of various metals, pesticides and antibiotics in the gut of fish was assessed in order to correlate their accumulation with changes of antioxidative enzymes activities and microbiome. Our results showed that fish from Bucharest lakes designed for leisure (Chitila, Floreasca and Tei lakes) have an increased level of oxidative stress in intestine tissue, revealed by affected antioxidant enzymes activities and GSH levels, as well as the high degree of lipid peroxidation, compared to the fish from protected environment (Vacaresti Lake). Some heavy metals (Fe, Ni and Pb) and pesticides (aldrin and dieldrin) were in high amount in the gut of fish with modified antioxidative status. In conclusion, our study could improve the knowledge regarding the current state of urban aquatic pollution in order to impose several environmental health measures.Entities:
Keywords: Bucharest; aquatic pollution; fish; microbiome; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742758 PMCID: PMC9224152 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Maps of Romania (left) and Bucharest (right) showing the four lakes (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti) selected to collect the fish for further experiments.
Geographical coordinates of each lake selected for this study and the characteristics of Carassius gibelio individuals in terms of body weight and length. Results are expressed as an average value ± standard deviation of 7 fish for each lake.
| Lake | Geographical | Body | Body |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chitila | 44.499861/25.998267 | 65.14 ± 18.38 | 14.93 ± 1.64 |
| Floreasca | 44.473304/26.105442 | 82.99 ± 11.66 | 16.29 ± 1.04 |
| Tei | 44.465912/26.123475 | 77.05 ± 9.74 | 16.13 ± 0.97 |
| Vacaresti | 44.399918/26.133721 | 86.73 ± 7.56 | 14.50 ± 5.50 |
1 The numbers were established using Google maps localization on the cellphone at the moment of fish collection.
Level of metals in the gut of Carassius gibelio fish collected from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti). Results are expressed as average values ± standard deviation (7 fish per lake and 3 technical replicates).
| Metal | Chitila Lake | Floreasca Lake | Tei Lake | Vacaresti Lake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 0.08 ± 0.007 a | 0.08 ± 0.007 a | <0.08 b | <0.08 b |
| Cr | 1.16 ± 0.151 | 1.42 ± 0.184 | 0.20 ± 0.260 | 0.20 ± 0.026 |
| Cu | 6.65 ± 0.778 | 6.84 ± 0.800 | 1.7 ± 0.198 | 3.12 ± 0.366 |
| Fe | 414 ± 52.2 | 974 ± 122.8 | 151.4 ± 19.08 | 72.4 ± 9.12 |
| Mn | 37.1 ± 2.82 | 75.6 ± 5.74 | 16.18 ± 1.23 | 84.9 ± 4.30 |
| Ni | 3.43 ± 0.401 | 1.58 ± 0.184 | 0.76 ± 0.088 | 0.3 ± 0.036 |
| Pb | 2.30 ± 0.216 | 2.78 ± 0.262 | <0.33 b | <0.33 b |
| Zn | 1052 ± 105 | 166.6 ± 16.66 | 556 ± 55.6 | 642 ± 6.4 |
| Ca | 3836 ± 445 | 7704 ± 894 | 1220 ± 140.16 | 4600 ± 534 |
| Mg | 1144 ± 166 | 408 ± 59.2 | 322 ± 46.6 | 480 ± 69.6 |
| Na | 6283 ± 660 | 2892 ± 304 | 2372 ± 250 | 1832 ± 192.4 |
| K | 5928 ± 889 | 2602 ± 390 | 3592 ± 538 | 5806 ± 870 |
a average value ± uncertainty value. b values lower than quantification limit (LOQ).
Level of pesticides in the gut of Carassius gibelio fish collected from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti). Results are expressed as average values ± standard deviation (7 fish per lake and 3 technical replicates). ND means not detected.
| Pesticide | Chitila Lake | Floreasca Lake | Tei Lake | Vacaresti Lake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chloroneb | 0.020 ± 0.0015 | 0.018 ± 0.0084 | 0.054 ± 0.0029 | 0.016 ± 0.0181 |
|
Pentachlorobenzene | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
Alpha-BHC | 0.0025 ± 0.0004 | ND | 0.0047 ± 0.0015 | 0.0013 ± 0.0025 |
|
Hexachlorobenzene | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
Pentachloroanisol | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
Beta-BHC | 0.0025 ± 0.0003 | ND | 0.0022 ± 0.0006 | 0.0021 ± 0.0019 |
|
Gamma-BHC (Lindane) | 0.0027 ± 0.0003 | ND | ND | ND |
|
Diazinone | 0.017 ± 0.0025 | 0.169 ± 0.0331 | 0.194 ± 0.0277 | 0.121 ± 0.0344 |
|
Delta-BHC | 0.0042 ± 0.0116 | 0.0014 ± 0.0014 | 0.0033 ± 0.0009 | 0.0081 ± 0.0016 |
|
Endosulfan ether | 0.029 ± 0.0038 | 0.0031 ± 0.0009 | 0.021 ± 0.0087 | 0.0029 ± 0.0019 |
|
Chloropyriphos-methyl | 0.019 ± 0.0061 | 0.0082 ± 0.0006 | 0.012 ± 0.0044 | 0.012 ± 0.0159 |
|
Heptachlor | 0.020 ± 0.0045 | 0.068 ± 0.0041 | 0.315 ± 0.0320 | 0.039 ± 0.0092 |
|
Pentachlorothioanisole | ND | ND | 0.0055 ± 0.0014 | 0.0010 ± 0.0026 |
|
Aldrin | 3.429 ± 0.0188 | 0.018 ± 0.0031 | 0.058 ± 0.0169 | 0.012 ± 0.0138 |
|
Chlorpyrifos | 0.049 ± 0.0031 | 0.0056 ± 0.0013 | 0.011 ± 0.0060 | 0.0078 ± 0.0032 |
|
4,4′-Dichlorobenzophenone | 0.019 ± 0.0036 | 0.0078 ± 0.0012 | 0.013 ± 0.0075 | 0.0195 ± 0.0029 |
|
Isodrin | 0.0076 ± 0.0006 | 0.0014 ± 0.0003 | 0.0035 ± 0.0015 | 0.0072 ± 0.0023 |
|
Heptachlor epoxide | 0.026 ± 0.0047 | ND | 0.0097 ± 0.0020 | ND |
|
Trans-Chlordane | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
2,4′-DDE | 0.019 ± 0.0019 | 0.567 ± 0.0520 | 1.465 ± 0.0565 | 0.635 ± 0.0503 |
|
Cis-Chlordane | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
Trans-Nonachlor | 0.005 ± 0.0011 | 0.0021 ± 0.0004 | 0.0047 ± 0.0012 | 0.006 ± 0.0023 |
|
Chlorfenson (Ovex) | 0.402 ± 0.0050 | 0.004 ± 0.0003 | ND | ND |
|
Dieldrin | 20.456 ± 0.0475 | 0.090 ± 0.0104 | 0.293 ± 0.0404 | 0.056 ± 0.0244 |
|
4,4′-DDE | 0.016 ± 0.0024 | 0.010 ± 0.0064 | 0.730 ± 0.0485 | 0.096 ± 0.0137 |
|
2,4′-DDD | 0.017 ± 0.0046 | 0.019 ± 0.0027 | 0.101 ± 0.0111 | 0.018 ± 0.0061 |
|
Cis-Nonachlor | 0.0011 ± 0.0004 | ND | 0.0022 ± 0.0006 | ND |
|
2,4′-DDT | 0.0072 ± 0.0006 | ND | 0.047 ± 0.0106 | 0.0046 ± 0.0009 |
|
Endosulfan sulfate | ND0.0365 | ND | ND | ND |
|
Methoxychlor olefin | 0.229 ± 0.0045 | 0.043 ± 0.0060 | 0.163 ± 0.0280 | 0.099 ± 0.0121 |
|
4,4′-DDT | 0.052 ± 0.0052 | 0.017 ± 0.0066 | 0.028 ± 0.0046 | 0.013 ± 0.0075 |
|
2,4′-Methoxychlor | 0.108 ± | 2.705 ± 0.0080 | 6.926 ± 0.1252 | 1.406 ± 0.0748 |
|
Endrin ketone | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
Mirex | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Cumulative Pesticide Level | 24.9598 ± 0.0157 | 3.7576 ± 0.0549 | 10.4668 ± 0.0626 | 2.5835 ± 0.1371 |
Level of antibiotics in the gut of Carassius gibelio fish collected from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti). Results are expressed as average values ± standard deviation (7 fish per lake and 3 technical replicates). ND means not determined.
| Antibiotic | Chitila Lake | Floreasca Lake | Tei Lake | Vacaresti Lake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imipenem | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Vancomycin | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Meropenem | 0.027 ± 0.0201 | 0.021 ± 0.0271 | ND | 0.031 ± 0.0101 |
| Tetracycline | 0.182 ± 0.0271 | 0.096 ± 0.0264 | 0.218 ± 0.0861 | 0.311 ± 0.0323 |
| Colistin sulphate | 0.022 ± 0.0195 | ND | ND | ND |
| Clindamycin | 0.0058 ± 0.0015 | 0.0031 ± 0.0019 | 0.0069 ± 0.0023 | 0.0099 ± 0.0030 |
| Erythromycin | 0.01 ± 0.0157 | 0.005 ± 0.0298 | 0.012 ± 0.0215 | 0.017 ± 0.0188 |
| Cumulative drug level | 0.227 ± 0.0517 | 0.1251 ± 0.0781 | 0.2369 ± 0.0976 | 0.3689 ± 0.0337 |
Level of antioxidant enzymes in the gut of Carassius gibelio fish collected from lakes in Bucharest (Vacaresti, Floreasca, Tei and Chitila). Results are expressed as average values ± standard deviation (n = 7). Comparisons between groups of fish from different lakes (Chtila, Floreasca or Tei Lake compared to Vacaresti Lake) were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc Bonferroni test. *** p < 0.001 compared to Vacaresti Lake.
| Specific Activity of Enzyme | Chitila Lake | Floreasca Lake | Tei Lake | Vacaresti Lake |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalase (Kat/mg of total protein) | 0.061 ± 0.190 | 0.083 ± 0.025 | 0.074 ± 0.025 | 0.180 ± 0.025 |
| Superoxide dismutase (U/mg of total protein) | 0.077 ± 0.020 | 0.065 ± 0.022 | 0.091 ± 0.031 | 0.158 ± 0.032 |
| Glutathione reductase (U/mg of total protein) | 0.017 ± 0.005 | 0.014 ± 0.004 | 0.024 ± 0.006 | 0.034 ± 0.007 |
| Glutathione peroxidase (U/mg of total protein) | 93.675 ± 20.173 | 130.161 ± 13.930 | 105.766 ± 21.316 | 119.491 ± 17.101 |
| Glutathione S-transferase (U/mg of total protein) | 0.019 ± 0.003 | 0.025 ± 0.005 | 0.015 ± 0.002 | 0.116 ± 0.021 |
Figure 2Level of (A) reduced glutathione (GSH) and (B) malondialdehyde (MDA) in the gut of Carassus gibelio fish from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti). Results were expressed average values ± standard deviation (n = 7). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001 compared to Vacaresti Lake.
Figure 3Level of 5-mC in DNA extracted from gut of fish collected from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti). Results are expressed as average values ± standard deviation (7 fish per lake and 3 technical replicates).
Figure 4Microbiome analysis of intestinal fish samples from lakes in Bucharest (Chitila, Floreasca, Tei and Vacaresti): (A) alpha diversity within each sample, (B) beta diversity based principal component (PC) analysis (Bray-Curtis, species level). Results are presented as average values ± standard deviations (n = 7). *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001 compared to Vacaresti Lake.
Figure 5Microbiome composition in fish from Chitila (A) and Floreasca (B) lakes. OTUs represented as percentage of sequence reads. Krona plots showing 16S rRNA Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) abundance. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was performed using Ion Torrent PGM. Results are presented as average values ± standard deviations (n = 7).
Figure 6Microbiome composition in fish from Tei (A) and Vacaresti (B) lakes. OTUs represented as percentage of sequence reads. Krona plots showing 16S rRNA Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) abundance. The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was performed using Ion Torrent PGM. Results are presented as average values ± standard deviations (n = 7).