| Literature DB >> 35742619 |
Sílvia Oliveira Lopes1, Sarah Aparecida Vieira Ribeiro1, Dayane de Castro Morais1, Elizangela da Silva Miguel1, Laís Silveira Gusmão2, Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini1, Silvia Eloiza Priore1.
Abstract
The majority of studies on anemia are focused on children and women of reproductive age. Although the disease is a widespread public health problem, studies that include the rural population are scarce. This study determined the prevalence of anemia and associated factors in adults and the elderly living in the rural area of a municipality in Minas Gerais. Twelve rural communities were included. During home visits, hemoglobin levels were measured using a hemoglobinometer to check for the presence or absence of anemia. Additionally, anthropometric data and food insecurity data based on the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale (EBIA) were collected. A questionnaire about socioeconomic, demographic, and housing conditions was applied. Analyses were performed using the Stata software version 13.0. Spearman correlation and regression analysis logistics were performed (p < 0.05) on 124 families (n = 297 farmers). The prevalence of anemia was 41.1%, being higher among women (55.7%). Additionally, 40.1% of the farmers were food insecure; 52.7% and 80.5% presented excess weight and cardiovascular risk, respectively. Poverty was a reality for 39.7% of individuals. A positive correlation between hemoglobin levels and per capita income was found as well as a negative correlation with EBIA scores and cardiovascular risk. Multivariate analysis showed that individuals experiencing food insecurity, the elderly, and those who do not own a property, were more likely to be anemic. Farmers with per capita income above 1/2 minimum wage were less likely to have anemia. The prevalence of anemia in the group studied was higher than previous studies. The disease is associated with factors that also predispose to food insecurity. The improvement of the determinants of insecurity can contribute to the fight against anemia.Entities:
Keywords: anemia; hemoglobin; iron deficiency; nutritional status; rural environment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742619 PMCID: PMC9224523 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Food security, nutritional status, socioeconomic, demographic, and housing conditions of adults and the elderly in a rural municipality of Brazil.
| Variables | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|
|
| % | |
|
| ||
| Secure | 178 | 59.9 |
| Insecure | 119 | 40.1 |
|
| ||
| Normal | 140 | 47.3 |
| Excess weight 1 | 156 | 52.7 |
|
| ||
| Unaltered | 57 | 19.5 |
| Altered | 235 | 80.5 |
|
| ||
| Adult | 198 | 66.7 |
| Elderly | 99 | 33.3 |
|
| ||
| Female | 156 | 52.5 |
| Male | 141 | 47.5 |
|
| ||
| ≤1/2 minimum wage | 118 | 39.7 |
| >1/2 minimum wage | 179 | 60.3 |
|
| ||
| ≤4 | 178 | 60.1 |
| >4 | 118 | 39.9 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 257 | 86.5 |
| No | 40 | 13.5 |
|
| ||
| ≤3 | 155 | 52.4 |
| >3 | 141 | 47.6 |
|
| ||
| ≤4 | 105 | 35.4 |
| >4 | 192 | 64.6 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 25 | 8.4 |
| No | 271 | 91.6 |
|
| ||
| Well | 244 | 82.2 |
| Spring | 53 | 17.8 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 232 | 78.1 |
| No | 65 | 21.9 |
|
| ||
| Public waste collection | 14 | 4.8 |
| Burning/“open-air garbage dump”/Burying | 279 | 95.2 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 275 | 92.6 |
| No | 22 | 7.4 |
1 Excess weight = overweight + obese; 2 established minimum wage BRL 1045.00; * different answers n = 297.
Figure 1Correlation between hemoglobin values (g/dL), EBIA, WHR, and per capita income (BRL) of adults and elderly in rural households in a municipality of Brazil. Correlation was found between hemoglobin values, EBIA scores (A), and WHR values (B), while per capita income presented a positive correlation (C).
Prevalence of anemia in rural households in a municipality of Brazil, according to the assessment of food security, nutritional status, socioeconomic, demographic, and housing conditions.
| Variables | Anemic | Not Anemic | OR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | |||
|
| ||||||
| Secure | 61 | 50.0 | 117 | 66.9 | 2.017 | 0.004 |
| Insecure | 61 | 50.0 | 58 | 33.1 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Normal | 59 | 48.8 | 81 | 46.3 | 0.905 | 0.675 |
| Excess weight 1 | 62 | 51.2 | 94 | 53.7 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Not altered | 25 | 20.7 | 32 | 18.3 | 0.884 | 0.679 |
| Altered | 96 | 79.3 | 139 | 79.4 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Adult | 72 | 59.0 | 126 | 72.0 | 1.786 | 0.020 |
| Elderly 2 | 50 | 41.0 | 49 | 28.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 68 | 55.7 | 88 | 50.3 | 1.245 | 0.355 |
| Male | 54 | 44.3 | 87 | 49.7 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤1/2 minimum wage | 60 | 49.2 | 58 | 33.1 | 0.512 | 0.006 |
| >1/2 minimum wage | 62 | 50.8 | 117 | 66.9 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤4 | 84 | 68.9 | 94 | 54.0 | 0.532 | 0.011 |
| >4 | 38 | 31.1 | 80 | 46.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 98 | 80.3 | 159 | 90.9 | 2.434 | 0.010 |
| No | 24 | 19.7 | 16 | 9.1 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤3 | 58 | 47.5 | 97 | 55.7 | 1.390 | 0.165 |
| >3 | 64 | 52.5 | 77 | 44.3 | ||
|
| ||||||
| ≤4 | 42 | 34.4 | 63 | 36.0 | 1.071 | 0.780 |
| >4 | 80 | 65.6 | 112 | 64.0 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 13 | 10.7 | 13 | 7.4 | 0.673 | 0.335 |
| No | 109 | 89.3 | 162 | 92.6 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Well | 93 | 76.2 | 151 | 86.3 | 1.962 | 0.028 |
| Spring | 29 | 23.8 | 24 | 13.7 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 95 | 77.9 | 137 | 78.3 | 1.025 | 0.932 |
| No | 27 | 22.1 | 38 | 21.7 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Public waste collection | 5 | 4.1 | 9 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.646 |
| Burning/“open-air garbage dump”/Burying | 117 | 95.9 | 162 | 94.7 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Yes | 113 | 92.6 | 162 | 92.6 | 0.993 | 0.987 |
| No | 9 | 7.4 | 13 | 7.4 | ||
1 Excess weight = overweight + obese; 2 reference of elderly (adults ≥ 20 years and <59 years; elderly ≥ 60 years); 3 established minimum wage BRL 1045.00; * different answers n = 297. OR = odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; ǂ binary logistic regression.
Final logistic regression model of the association between anemia, food insecurity classified by the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale (EBIA), being elderly, income and housing characteristics of rural households in a municipality of Brazil.
| Variables | OR | CI 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Food insecurity | 2.311 | 1.379–3.869 | 0.001 |
| Elderly | 2.861 | 1.642–4.983 | <0.001 |
| Not owning a home | 2.651 | 1.237–5.681 | 0.012 |
| Income ≤ 1/2 minimum wage | 0.531 | 0.309–0.910 | 0.021 |
OR = odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.