| Literature DB >> 35742498 |
Nawal Nabilah Kamaludin1, Rosediani Muhamad1, Zainab Mat Yudin2, Rosnani Zakaria1.
Abstract
Sex education (SE) is still a controversial and sensitive topic in Malaysia. Thus, individuals with intellectual disability receive less information about SE formally as Malaysian culture believes that students with disabilities should be shielded from everything connected to sexuality owing to their paucity of maturity and intellectual comprehension of the topic. Due to that reason, non-formal education by the parent is very important to fill that needful gap. This study aimed to explore the experience of mothers on the meanings of sexuality, and implementing sex education for their children with ID. We adopted a phenomenological framework and social cognitive theory to increase understanding of the phenomenon and conducted it using in-depth interviews. Twenty mothers with children aged 10-19 who were diagnosed with mild to moderate ID and/or other cognitive disabilities were involved. Almost all mothers acknowledged the influence of socio-cultural factors and religion on meanings of sexuality and practicing SE. They realized their children's emerging sexual behavior as they go through the adolescence period. However, how they confronted sexuality and sex education with their vulnerable children was different. Three themes emerged: (1) Sexuality as an erotic experience in life, which enlightens mothers' views on sexuality, relying mainly on sexual intimacy and sexual being; (2) Perceived their children's sexual maturity is different, which reflects the mothers' attitude toward their children's sexual development; (3) Caution/hesitance in providing sexuality education, which summarizes mothers' ways of delivering SE, either following physicality or through sociocultural ways. Our findings exemplify the need for strategies to increase parents' understanding and awareness regarding sexuality and appropriate delivery of SE. To ensure its success, it should be a shared responsibility among all relevant stakeholders.Entities:
Keywords: intellectual disability; sex education; sexuality
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742498 PMCID: PMC9223818 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127249
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Bidirectional factors that influence mothers’ outcomes based on Social Cognitive Theory [26].
Semi-structured questionnaire: an interview guide.
| Introduction | ||
|---|---|---|
| This study concerns sexuality and sexual education (SE) for children with intellectual disabilities (ID). I am interested to hear your experience and your perspective as parents in describing sexuality and providing SE to your children living with ID and how environmental factors influence your SE practice. | ||
| Questions | Specific Questions | Probing Questions |
|
From your experiences, what does sexuality mean? |
What does sexuality mean to you? How do you get personal messages about sexuality? |
Describe how environmental factors (upbringing, school, and community) influence personal messages about sexuality. How does this understanding influence your view and SE practice on your child? |
|
How do you view sexuality in your children as a sexual being? |
Describe in terms of sexual development, behavior and sexual maturity? How do your children (with ID) convey or express sexuality (in any way)? A way of dressing, gender identity, a way of thinking, behavior and attitude. Any differences with your other children? If yes, how? | |
|
What are your experiences in providing SE to your child with ID? |
What are your views on SE in Malaysia? |
What do you know about SE? How important is SE to children with ID? If it is, why? If not, why? What is your most concern in delivering SE? Any difference in providing SE among your children (with and without ID)? In what condition will SE help your children now and in the future? |
|
How confident are you to convey SE to your children? |
How early did you initiate the conversation? Any specific topic? Any difficulty in communicating SE with your child with ID? If yes, why. How much did your child with ID understand the topic discussed? Please describe. | |
| Ending: Before ending this interview, is there anything else that you want to add, comment, or share? | ||
Characteristics of the mothers and children with intellectual disabilities (n = 20).
| Variables | Mean (SD) | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 48.75 (8.45) | |||
|
| ||||
| Married | 14 | 70 | ||
| Widowed/Divorced | 6 | 30 | ||
|
| ||||
| Primary (Standard 1 (7 years old)—Standard 6 (12 years old)) | 3 | 15 | ||
| Secondary (Form 1 (13 years old)—Form 5/6 (17/18 years old)) | 11 | 55 | ||
| Tertiary (Completed college/university) | 6 | 30 | ||
|
| ||||
| Homemaker | 11 | 55 | ||
| Public Sector | 6 | 30 | ||
| Private Sector | 3 | 15 | ||
|
| ||||
| Muslim | 20 | 100 | ||
|
| 15.35 (2.62) | |||
| Early Adolescent (10–14) | 7 | 35 | ||
| Middle Adolescent (15–17) | 7 | 35 | ||
| Late Adolescent (18–19) | 6 | 30 | ||
|
| ||||
| Male | 15 | 75 | ||
| Female | 5 | 25 | ||
|
| ||||
| Intellectual Disability solely | 5 | 25 | ||
| Autism Spectrum Disorder with comorbid ID | 4 | 20 | ||
| Down Syndrome | 5 | 25 | ||
| Mixed with comorbid ID | 6 | 30 | ||
|
| 4.45 (1.61) | |||
|
| 2.95 (1.85) | |||
| First | 4 | 20 | ||
| Second | 6 | 30 | ||
| Third and above | 10 | 50 | ||
Figure 2Effect of personal factors, sociocultural norms, and behavior factors on mothers’ choices regarding sexual education practices.