| Literature DB >> 35742440 |
Magdalena Brodowicz-Król1, Monika Kaczoruk2, Paulina Kaczor-Szkodny2, Danuta Zarzycka1.
Abstract
The essence of the profile of nursing professional competences are basic behavioral characteristics, as well as mastering practical skills. The aim of this study was determination of the development of professional competences of perceiving a patient by first-, second-and third-year students of licentiate nursing study. The study was of a longitudinal character, and lasted for 3 years. The research instrument used was the Ascent to Competence Scale, and traditional assessment of students' knowledge and skills. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the average grade in practical education from all three years, and competences in student-teacher relationship. Higher grades in theoretical education were accompanied by lower results obtained by students in the area of nursing competences. The respondents' opinions concerning the development of knowledge and professional skills were relatively high among first-year students, which may be related with a sharp increase in nursing knowledge, whereas third-year students considered it important to perceive a considerable development of professional competences. The results of this study can help in the design of education programs meeting quality standards, and alignment with students and population health needs, which is adequate to the assumptions of the WHO Global Strategic Directions for Nursing and Midwifery 2021-2025.Entities:
Keywords: competences; education; nursing students; practice development
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742440 PMCID: PMC9223031 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Characteristics of the selected features of the curriculum in Poland.
| Educational Stimulus I | Educational Stimulus II | Educational Stimulus III | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1745 h | 1545 h | 1580 h |
|
| Lectures, classes, practical training, professional internships | Lectures, classes, practical training, professional internships | Lectures, classes, practical training, professional internships |
|
| None | ||
|
| tests of knowledge, essays, oral examination, | tests of knowledge, essays, oral examination, observation of performance of the task ordered, written examination (open questions) | Tests of knowledge, essay, oral examination, written examination (open questions), observation of performance of the task ordered |
Demographic characteristics of the examined group of students who participated in the 3-year study cycle.
| N | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Females | 86 | 95.56 |
| Males | 4 | 4.44 | |
| Age * | 19 | 5 | 5.56 |
| 20 | 64 | 71.11 | |
| 21 | 10 | 11.11 | |
| 22 | 6 | 6.66 | |
| 23 and over | 5 | 5.56 | |
| Total | 90 | 100.00 | |
* The mean age of students beginning the study was 21.74 years.
Characteristics of conditioning and development of nursing competences (ACS-ST, ACS-BW, ACS-LC) over the 3-year education cycle on the level of first-degree study.
| Variable | Year at University | Mean | SD | Statistical Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 | 2.44 | 0.69 | F (2.178) = 1.651 |
| 2 | 2.33 | 0.68 | ||
| 3 | 2.26 | 0.68 | ||
|
| 1 | 2.31 | 0.53 | F (2.178) = 0.508 |
| 2 | 2.22 | 0.57 | ||
| 3 | 2.26 | 0.62 | ||
|
| 1 | 2.44 | 0.75 | F (2.178) = 0.596 |
| 2 | 2.40 | 0.65 | ||
| 3 | 2.51 | 0.68 |
Legend: F—result of one-way repeated measures ANOVA, p—statistical significance. ACS-ST—student–teacher relationship; ACS-BW—student’s belonging to the group; ACS-LC—professional knowledge and skills of the nursing student.
Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between the development of nursing competences and school grades obtained by students after the first, second, and third year of the study, and average grade during three-year cycle of education.
| Correlated Variables | ACS-ST | ACS-BW | ACS-LC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year I | r | −0.091 | 0.044 | 0.030 |
|
| 0.459 | 0.719 | 0.809 | |
| Year I KT | r | −0.108 | −0.026 | 0.094 |
|
| 0.380 | 0.837 | 0.444 | |
| Year I KP | r | −0.062 | 0.081 | −0.019 |
|
| 0.617 | 0.510 | 0.881 | |
| Year II | r | −0.165 | −0.013 | −0.076 |
|
| 0.179 | 0.916 | 0.538 | |
| Year II. KT | r | −0.138 | −0.131 | −0.070 |
|
| 0.262 | 0.287 | 0.569 | |
| Year II. KP | r | −0.127 | 0.070 | −0.054 |
|
| 0.301 | 0.571 | 0.661 | |
| Year III | r | 0.002 | −0.116 | −0.150 |
|
| 0.989 | 0.347 | 0.224 | |
| Year III. KT | r | 0.152 | 0.074 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.215 | 0.551 | 0.991 | |
| Year III. KP | r | −0.080 | −0.179 | −0.180 |
|
| 0.516 | 0.145 | 0.141 | |
| Average grade I–III | r | −0.222 | −0.214 | −0.199 |
|
| 0.069 | 0.080 | 0.104 | |
| Average grade I–III | r | −0.158 | −0.161 | −0.230 |
|
| 0.199 | 0.189 | 0.059 | |
| Average grade I–III | r | −0.245 | −0.239 | −0.158 |
|
| 0.044 | 0.050 | 0.199 | |
Legend: ACS-ST—student–teacher relationship, ACS-BW—student’s belonging to the group, ACS-LC—professional knowledge and skills of the nursing student, Year I, II, III—average grade in the first, second, and third year of the study, Year I, II, III KT—average grade in theoretical education in the first, second, and third year of the study, Year I, II, IIIKP—average grade in practical training in the first, second, and third year of the study.
Comparison of results of theoretical and practical education, student–teacher relationship (ACS-ST), student’s belonging to the group (ACS-BW) between respondents with lower and higher nursing competences, based on data collected after the first, second, third year at university.
| Year I | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | ACS-LC | N | M | SD | Comparison of Mean Values |
|
| ‘low’ | 24 | 4.05 | 0.18 | |
| ‘high’ | 44 | 3.99 | 0.22 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 24 | 3.93 | 0.30 | |
| ‘high’ | 44 | 3.94 | 0.34 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 24 | 4.11 | 0.20 | |
| ‘high’ | 44 | 4.01 | 0.21 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 33 | 2.33 | 0.54 | |
| ‘high’ | 57 | 2.50 | 0.75 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 33 | 2.27 | 0.56 | |
| ‘high’ | 57 | 2.33 | 0.52 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| ‘low’ | 29 | 4.48 | 0.17 | |
| ‘high’ | 39 | 4.50 | 0.18 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 29 | 4.21 | 0.29 | |
| ‘high’ | 39 | 4.29 | 0.26 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 29 | 4.61 | 0.19 | |
| ‘high’ | 39 | 4.60 | 0.19 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 40 | 2.23 | 0.69 | |
| ‘high’ | 50 | 2.42 | 0.67 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 40 | 2.19 | 0.55 | |
| ‘high’ | 50 | 2.25 | 0.60 | ||
|
| |||||
|
| ‘low’ | 40 | 4.74 | 0.17 | |
| ‘high’ | 28 | 4.76 | 0.08 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 40 | 4.45 | 0.30 | |
| ‘high’ | 28 | 4.44 | 0.26 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 40 | 4.82 | 0.18 | |
| ‘high’ | 28 | 4.85 | 0.08 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 51 | 2.08 | 0.68 | |
| ‘high’ | 39 | 2.49 | 0.61 | ||
|
| ‘low’ | 51 | 2.11 | 0.63 | |
| ‘high’ | 39 | 2.46 | 0.54 | ||
Legend: N—number of respondents, M—mean, SD—standard deviation, ACS ST—student–teacher relationship, ACS BW—student’s belonging to the group, t—result of t-Student test, p—statistical significance.