| Literature DB >> 35742377 |
Yingjie Wang1, Bowen Xiao2, Ying Tao3, Yan Li3.
Abstract
Preschool teachers' job burnout has many adverse effects on their career development; although some studies have examined the influencing factors of teachers' burnout, less were explored from the perspective of individual factors. This study aimed to examine the relationship between mindfulness and job burnout of preschool teachers, and the mediating effects of emotional intelligence and coping style. A total of 394 preschool teachers in China filled in questionnaires measuring mindfulness, emotional intelligence, coping style, and job burnout. The findings suggested that: (1) mindfulness was negatively related to job burnout; (2) emotional intelligence and negative coping style played independent mediating effects between mindfulness and job burnout; and (3) emotional intelligence and positive coping style played a chain mediating effect between mindfulness and job burnout. The results revealed the mechanism of mindfulness on preschool teachers' job burnout, which is of great significance for the psychological intervention of preschool teachers in the future.Entities:
Keywords: coping style; emotional intelligence; job burnout; mindfulness; preschool teachers
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742377 PMCID: PMC9222807 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The proposed chain mediating model. EI = emotional intelligence.
Correlations and descriptive statistics of measured variables.
|
|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Gender | − | − | 1 | ||||||
| 2. Age | 33.60 | 8.45 | 0.10 | 1 | |||||
| 3. Mindfulness | 4.53 | 0.74 | −0.04 | −0.11 * | 1 | ||||
| 4. Emotional intelligence | 3.51 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.12 * | 0.46 *** | 1 | |||
| 5. Positive coping style | 2.18 | 0.45 | −0.01 | 0.12 * | 0.32 *** | 0.58 *** | 1 | ||
| 6. Negative coping style | 1.36 | 0.52 | −0.12 * | 0.01 | −0.19 ** | −0.02 | 0.15 ** | 1 | |
| 7. Burnout | 2.66 | 0.84 | 0.03 | −0.16 ** | −0.52 *** | −0.52 *** | −0.46 *** | 0.24 *** | 1 |
Note: 0 = male, 1 = female; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Bootstrapping indirect effects and 95% confidence interval for the mediation model.
| Hypothesis Model | β | SE | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | |||
| H1: Mindfulness—Burnout | −0.36 *** | 0.05 | −0.58 | −0.23 |
| H2: Mindfulness—EI—Burnout | −0.14 ** | 0.04 | −0.25 | −0.07 |
| H3a: Mindfulness—Positive Coping—Burnout | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
| H3b: Mindfulness—Negative Coping—Burnout | −0.06 * | 0.02 | −0.11 | −0.03 |
| H4a: Mindfulness—EI—Positive Coping—Burnout | −0.09 * | 0.03 | −0.14 | −0.05 |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2The chain mediation model. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. EI = emotional intelligence, PC = positive coping style, NC = negative coping style, PE = perceiving emotion, UE1 = use of emotion, UE2 = understanding emotion, ME = managing emotion, SM = social management, EE = emotional exhaustion, DP = depersonalization, PA = personal accomplishment.