| Literature DB >> 35742309 |
Heng Zhang1, Nam Nguyen-Dinh1, Hazreena Hussein2, Hong-Wei Ho1.
Abstract
Healing perception is considered to increase visitors' place attachment and loyalty. This research employed structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the structural relationship between healing perception, place attachment, environmental design, and visitors' loyalty to a place. The study investigated a metropolitan park in Gaoxiong, Taiwan, and collected 431 valid questionnaires on the site. The results showed that the environmental design affected the human perception of healing and place attachment, which substantially affected the visitors' loyalty toward the place. The healing perception powerfully impacted loyalty (0.76), which contained an indirect effect through place attachment and enhanced the direct impact of healing perception. Moreover, the environmental design had a capable direct effect (0.62) on visitors' loyalty through two full mediation paths: healing perception and place attachment. The study sheds light on designing a healing park that could enhance visitors' place attachment and strongly affect their loyalty to the park.Entities:
Keywords: environmental design; full mediation effect; healing perception; place attachment; place loyalty; structural equation modeling (SEM)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742309 PMCID: PMC9222215 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Proposed framework for the research.
Figure 2(a) Map of Taiwan; (b) Map of Gaoxiong; (c) Gaoxiong Weiwuying Metropolitan Park.
Demographic characteristics of the respondents.
| Characteristics | Sample | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 209 | 48.5 |
| Female | 222 | 51.5 |
| Age | ||
| 11–20 | 10 | 2.3 |
| 21–30 | 80 | 18.6 |
| 31–40 | 189 | 43.9 |
| 41–50 | 113 | 26.2 |
| 51–60 | 15 | 3.4 |
| Above 61 | 24 | 5.6 |
| Residence | ||
| Local residence | 184 | 42.7 |
| From other local | 247 | 57.3 |
| Education | ||
| Elementary | 4 | 0.9 |
| Secondary school | 18 | 4.2 |
| High school | 83 | 19.3 |
| Graduate | 248 | 57.5 |
| Postgraduate | 78 | 18.1 |
| Frequency | ||
| under 2 times | 124 | 28.8 |
| 2 times | 106 | 24.6 |
| 3 times | 92 | 21.3 |
| 4 times | 88 | 20.4 |
| above 5 times | 21 | 4.9 |
Reliability assessment of the constructs.
| Construct and Indicators | Mean | Std. Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental design (α = 0.945) | ||
| Recreational space (A01 to A04) | 3.80 | 0.663 |
| Building (A05 to A08) | 3.86 | 0.700 |
| Walks (A09 to A11) | 3.81 | 0.679 |
| Outdoor furniture (A12 to A15) | 3.56 | 0.688 |
| Planting (A16 to A19) | 3.92 | 0.755 |
| Signboard (A20 to A23) | 3.55 | 0.715 |
| Place attachment (α = 0.942) | ||
| Emotional attachment (B01 to B05) | 3.71 | 0.737 |
| Functional attachment (B06 to B10) | 3.73 | 0.780 |
| Healing perception (α = 0.945) | ||
| Distance (C01 to C04) | 3.90 | 0.715 |
| Extension (C05 to C08) | 3.76 | 0.650 |
| Fascination (C09 to C12) | 3.70 | 0.672 |
| Compatibility (C13 to C16) | 3.96 | 0.619 |
| Loyalty (α = 0.924) | ||
| Attitude loyalty (E01 to E02) | 4.06 | 0.705 |
| Behavior loyalty (E03 to E04) | 4.11 | 0.696 |
Convergent validity of measurement model.
| Construct/Indicator | Factor Loading (λ) | Reliability Coefficient (λ2) | Measurement Error (1 − λ2) | AVE (2) | CR (3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental design | 0.574 | 0.889 | |||
| Recreational space | 0.800 *** | 0.640 | 0.360 | ||
| Building | 0.772 *** | 0.596 | 0.404 | ||
| Walks | 0.760 *** | 0.578 | 0.422 | ||
| Outdoor furniture | 0.804 (1) | 0.646 | 0.354 | ||
| Planting | 0.705 *** | 0.497 | 0.503 | ||
| Signboard | 0.696 *** | 0.484 | 0.516 | ||
| Place attachment (PA) | 0.778 | 0.875 | |||
| Emotional attachment | 0.837 *** | 0.701 | 0.299 | ||
| Functional attachment | 0.925 (1) | 0.856 | 0.144 | ||
| Healing perception (HP) | 0.663 | 0.887 | |||
| Distance | 0.718 *** | 0.516 | 0.484 | ||
| Extension | 0.829 *** | 0.687 | 0.313 | ||
| Fascination | 0.848 (1) | 0.719 | 0.281 | ||
| Compatibility | 0.854 *** | 0.729 | 0.271 | ||
| Loyalty (LO) | 0.797 | 0.887 | |||
| Attitude loyalty | 0.894 (1) | 0.799 | 0.201 | ||
| Behavior loyalty | 0.892 *** | 0.796 | 0.204 |
Note. *** p < 0.001. (1) Significance was not calculated because the unstandardized loading was set as 1.0 to fix construct variance. (2) Average variance extracted = (∑λ2)/n (where n is the number of items). (3) Composite reliability = (∑λ)2/[(∑λ)2 + (∑error)].
Discriminant validity of measurement model.
| MSV | MaxR(H) | PA | ED | HP | LO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Place attachment (PA) | 0.619 | 0.892 | 0.882 | |||
| Environmental design (ED) | 0.543 | 0.893 | 0.660 *** | 0.757 | ||
| Healing perception (HP) | 0.634 | 0.895 | 0.787 *** | 0.737 *** | 0.814 | |
| Loyalty (LO) | 0.634 | 0.887 | 0.745 *** | 0.654 *** | 0.796 *** | 0.893 |
Note. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3The suggested model of the relationships among environmental design, healing perception, place attachment, and place loyalty. The dashed lines indicate the indirect effects between the pair of constructs. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
The total effects among the four constructs and the mediating effect of healing perception and place attachment.
| Path | Direct | Indirect | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ED→HP | 0.74 *** | 0.74 *** | |
| HP→PA | 0.66 *** | 0.66 *** | |
| ED→PA | 0.17 * | 0.49 ***(1) | 0.66 *** |
| HP→LO | 0.56 *** | 0.20 **(2) | 0.76 *** |
| PA→LO | 0.31 *** | 0.31 *** | |
| ED→LO | 0.62 *** | 0.62 *** | |
| ED→HP→LO | 0.414 ***(3) | 0.414 *** | |
| ED→HP→PA→LO | 0.204 ***(4) | 0.204 *** |
Note. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. ED-Environmental design; HP-Healing perception; PA-Place attachment; LO-Loyalty. Based on Sobel test [66], the indirect effects were examined as below: (1) ED→HP→PA: (0.74 × 0.66) = 0.49, z = 6.613, p < 0.001. (2) HP→PA→LO: (0.66 × 0.31) = 0.20, z = 3.116, p < 0.01. (3) ED→HP→LO: (0.74 × 0.56) = 0.414, z = 5.797, p < 0.001. (4) ED→HP→PA→LO: [(0.74 × 0.66) + 0.17] × 0.31 = 0.204, z = 3.345, p < 0.001.
Measurement items for environmental design.
| Indicator | Item |
|---|---|
| Recreational space | A01—Appropriate size of recreational space in the park |
| A02—Recreation space in the park is well arranged | |
| A03—Adequate recreational space facilities in the park | |
| A04—The recreational space in the park is well maintained | |
| Building | A05—The buildings in the park are of appropriate size |
| A06—The location of the buildings in the park is properly arranged | |
| A07—The buildings in the park are well maintained | |
| A08—The buildings in the park are in harmony with the surrounding environment | |
| Walks | A09—Proper planning of trails in the park |
| A10—The paved trails in the park are well maintained | |
| A11—The paved trail in the park is in harmony with the surrounding environment | |
| Outdoor furniture | A12—Proper arrangement of outdoor furniture in the park |
| A13—There is plenty of outdoor furniture in the park | |
| A14—Outdoor furniture in the park is well maintained | |
| A15—Outdoor furniture in the park is in harmony with the surrounding environment | |
| Planting | A16—Arrange the plant locations in the park appropriately |
| A17—There are plenty of plants in the park | |
| A18—Variety of plants in the park | |
| A19—The plants in the park are in harmony with the surrounding environment | |
| Signboard | A20—The artwork in the park is pleasing to the eye |
| A21—Signs in the park are obvious | |
| A22—The signs in the park are clear and easy to understand | |
| A23—Telegraph poles, electrical boxes, etc. in the park are not obvious |
Measurement items for place attachment.
| Indicator | Item |
|---|---|
| Emotional attachment | B01—Activities in this park give me peace of mind |
| B02—This park is very special to me | |
| B03—This park is meaningful to me | |
| B04—I think this park is part of my life | |
| B05—I have a strong sense of identification with this park | |
| Functional attachment | B06—Overall, I feel that activities in this park are better than in other parks |
| B07—Overall, I feel that activities in this park are irreplaceable in other places | |
| B08—Overall, I feel that I get more satisfaction in this park than in other parks | |
| B09—Overall, I think it’s more important to go to this park than to other parks | |
| B10—Overall, I like this park better than other parks |
Measurement items for healing perception.
| Indicator | Item |
|---|---|
| Distance | C01—I’m in a different place than usual |
| C02—Here for me to breathe | |
| C03—Here let me forget my troubles for a while | |
| C04—I think being here is an experience of escaping from daily life | |
| Extension | C05—The scenery I see here is related |
| C06—I think the scenery here is in harmony with this park | |
| C07—I think the scenery here allows me to imagine a wider landscape | |
| C08—I think the scenery here reminds me of a higher level | |
| Fascination | C09—I think there are many beautiful things here |
| C10—I think what happened here can arouse my curiosity | |
| C11—I think here I am often attracted to interesting things | |
| C12—I think the scenery here makes me linger | |
| Compatibility | C13—I think here I can do what I like |
| C14—I feel that in the scenery here, I feel comfortable | |
| C15—I think I can quickly integrate into the environment here | |
| C16—I think the environment here matches my personality |
Measurement items for loyalty.
| Indicator | Item |
|---|---|
| Attitude loyalty | E01—I will convey the positive message of this park to friends and relatives |
| E02—I will recommend and encourage relatives and friends to come to this park | |
| Behavior loyalty | E03—I am willing to stay in the park for more time |
| E04—In the future, I am still willing to come to this metropolitan park |