| Literature DB >> 35742175 |
Abstract
Overwork is one of the risk factors for the work-related burden of disease. In China, nearly a quarter of migrant women are overworked. Working long hours can significantly increase the possibility of migrant women suffering from hypertension and hyperglycemia. The phenomenon of overtime work of migrant women and their health conditions deserves attention. Based on the China Migrants Dynamic Survey in 2016, this study indicates that giving birth to a boy may exacerbate overtime work among migrant women and having more boys in a family increases the probability of women's overwork. Empirical results confirmed the existence of son preferences in China. Compared with women who gave birth to boys, women who gave birth to girls have a lower probability of being a workaholic due to a future fertility plan. Furthermore, the overwork of women is also due to the great economic burden on families to buy a wedding house, brought on by the birth of boys. To overcome the endogenous problem caused by this omitted explanatory variable, this study uses each province's relative sex ratio at birth in 2010 as the instrumental variable of the firstborn's gender. The IV results illustrate that the birth of boys still significantly exacerbates women's overwork. Furthermore, considering age heterogeneity, the influence of son preference on women's overtime work exists throughout their labor life cycle. This paper provides a new perspective for understanding migrant women's overtime work and their health issues in urban China.Entities:
Keywords: child gender; overwork; rural–urban migrant women; son preferences
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742175 PMCID: PMC9222581 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1The theoretical framework of child gender and migrant women’s overwork in China.
Descriptive statistics of variable characteristics.
| Variables | Explanation | Average | SD | Min. | Max. | Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overwork | Worked for more than 55 h a week (1 = yes; 0 = no) | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0 | 1 | 38,375 |
| Working hours | How many hours have you worked this week? | 54.41 | 18.58 | 0 | 99 | 38,375 |
| Age of firstborn | 12.24 | 8.61 | 0 | 18 | 42,158 | |
| Gender of firstborn | 0 = female; 1 = male | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 42,158 |
| Gender of second child | 0 = female; 1 = male | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0 | 1 | 14,460 |
| Primary caregiver of first child | 1 = mother; 0 = others | 0.71 | 0.45 | 0 | 1 | 41,492 |
| Primary caregiver of second child | 1 = mother; 0 = others | 0.72 | 0.44 | 0 | 1 | 14,460 |
| Labor contract | Type of labor contract (1 = fixed term labor contract; 2 = nonfixed term labor contract; 3 = working without a contract) | 1.77 | 0.68 | 1 | 3 | 14,265 |
| Medical insurance | Involved in the medical insurance system for urban employees (1 = yes; 0 = no) | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0 | 1 | 38,375 |
| Age | Rural–urban migrant women’s age | 35.39 | 8.61 | 20 | 59 | 42,158 |
| Women’s education | 1 = primary school and below; 2 = middle school; 3 = high school; 4 = undergraduate and above | 2.15 | 0.84 | 1 | 4 | 42,158 |
| Spouse’s education | 1 = primary school and below; 2 = middle school; 3 = high school; 4 = undergraduate and above | 2.28 | 0.82 | 1 | 4 | 41,255 |
| Monthly income | Self-income of last month (yuan) | 3395.24 | 2769.18 | −5000 | 90,000 | 34,422 |
| Family income | Family income of last month in the local area (yuan) | 6795.88 | 5178.54 | 0 | 200,000 | 42,158 |
| Family expenditure | Family expenditure of last month in the local area (yuan) | 3493.83 | 2368.03 | 200 | 50,000 | 42,158 |
Figure 2The weight of overwork between rural–urban and urban–urban women migrants in China.
Having sons and migrant women’s overtime work.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marginal Effect | Marginal Effect | Marginal Effect | Marginal Effect | |
| Firstborn boy (basic group: firstborn girl) | 0.072 *** | 0.068 *** | 0.051 ** | |
| (4.99) | (4.22) | 1.95 | ||
| Firstborn girl then boy (basic group: firstborn girl then a girl) | 0.079 * | |||
| (1.62) | ||||
| Firstborn boy, then girl | 0.073 * | |||
| (1.43) | ||||
| Firstborn boy, then boy | 0.112 ** | |||
| (2.57) | ||||
| Age of female | 0.090 *** | 0.071 *** | 0.067 ** | −0.079 * |
| (6.65) | (5.23) | (2.54) | (−1.82) | |
| Square of female age | −0.001 *** | −0.001 *** | −0.001 *** | 0.001 |
| (−5.49) | (−4.21) | (−2.34) | (1.60) | |
| Education level of female | ||||
| Junior middle school (basic group: elementary and below) | −0.018 | −0.065 * | −0.185 *** | −0.114 * |
| (−0.50) | (−1.79) | (−2.76) | (−1.72) | |
| High school | −0.087 ** | −0.162 *** | −0.389 *** | −0.230 ** |
| (−2.13) | (−3.89) | (−5.13) | (−2.47) | |
| Undergraduate and above | −0.300 *** | −0.401 *** | −0.688 *** | −0.542 *** |
| (−5.93) | (−7.80) | (−7.28) | (−3.26) | |
| Education level of spouse | ||||
| Junior middle school (basic group: elementary and below) | 0.044 | 0.016 | −0.110 | −0.080 |
| (1.28) | (1.38) | (−1.41) | (−1.04) | |
| High school | −0.062 | −0.118 *** | −0.230 *** | −0.302 *** |
| (−1.52) | (−2.42) | (−2.71) | (−3.05) | |
| Undergraduate and above | −0.386 *** | −0.489 *** | −0.324 *** | −0.258 |
| (−7.12) | (−9.12) | (−3.24) | (−1.61) | |
| Monthly disposable income of family | 0.212 *** | 0.050 ** | 0.098 *** | |
| (18.89) | (2.02) | (2.86) | ||
| Monthly family consumption | 0.118 *** | 0.149 *** | 0.095 * | |
| (5.67) | (3.99) | (1.78) | ||
| Labor contract (basic group: working without a labor contract) | −0.137 *** | |||
| (−4.05) | ||||
| Medical insurance (basic group: involved no employees’ medical insurance) | −0.336 *** | |||
| (−5.64) | ||||
| Primary caregiver of the first child (basic group: mother care) | 0.170 *** | 0.036 | ||
| (4.97) | (0.50) | |||
| Primary caregiver of the second child (basic group: mother care) | 0.134 * | |||
| (1.83) | ||||
| Intraprovincial migration (basic group: Intra city migration) | −0.059 | −0.117 | ||
| (−1.25) | (−1.50) | |||
| Interprovincial migration | −0.095 ** | −0.025 | ||
| (−2.04) | (−0.35) | |||
| Intercept | −2.934 *** | −3.998 *** | 2.343 *** | 1.863 ** |
| (−7.68) | (−15.54) | (4.27) | (2.18) | |
| Sample size | 22,013 | 21,415 | 18,520 | 11,467 |
Note: ***, **, and * indicate significance at the levels of 1%, 5%, 10%, respectively.
Empirical analysis of the number of boys and migrant women’s overwork.
| Variables | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probit | Logit | OLS | |
| One boy (basic group: no-boy) | 0.068 ** | 0.110 ** | 0.026 ** |
| (2.04) | (2.04) | (2.03) | |
| Two boys (basic group: no-boy) | 0.085 ** | 0.137 ** | 0.032 ** |
| (2.16) | (2.15) | (2.15) | |
| Other control variables | YES | YES | YES |
| Intercept | −3.670 *** | −5.944 *** | −0.867 *** |
| (−8.44) | (−8.38) | (−5.33) | |
| Sample size | 11,467 | 11,467 | 11,467 |
Note: *** and ** indicate significance at the levels of 1% and 5%.
Effects of overwork on migrant women’s health.
| Variables | Model 8 | Model 9 | Model 10 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poor Health | Hypertension | Diabetes | |
| Overwork | 0.076 *** | 0.066 ** | 0.076 * |
| (6.15) | (2.36) | (1.66) | |
| Age of female | −0.022 *** | 0.035 ** | −0.048 ** |
| (−3.62) | (2.36) | (−2.34) | |
| Square of female age | 0.000 ** | 0.000 * | 0.001 *** |
| (2.27) | (1.66) | (3.95) | |
| Education level of female | |||
| Junior middle school (basic group: elementary and below) | −0.059 * | −0.169 *** | −0.119 |
| (−1.83) | (−3.54) | (−1.48) | |
| High school and above | −0.038 | −0.366 *** | −0.255 *** |
| (−1.11) | (−6.28) | (−2.68) | |
| The duration of the migration | 0.008 *** | 0.010 *** | 0.014 *** |
| (6.90) | (5.21) | (4.61) | |
| lnwage | −0.025 *** | −0.046 *** | −0.045 *** |
| (−4.57) | (−4.67) | (−3.08) | |
| Medical insurance (basic group: involved no employees’ medical insurance) | −0.066 *** | 0.018 | −0.068 |
| (−5.04) | (0.62) | (−1.44) | |
| Intercept | 0.738 *** | −3.355 *** | −1.779 *** |
| (6.19) | (−10.48) | (−4.20) | |
| Sample size | 40,898 | 39,980 | 39,980 |
Note: ***, **, and * indicate significance at the levels of 1%, 5%, 10%, respectively.
Effect of a firstborn boy on the pregnancy of migrant women.
| Variables | Model 11 | Model 12 | Model 13 |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLS | Probit | Logit | |
| Firstborn boy (basic group: firstborn girl) | −0.029 *** | −0.178 *** | −0.338 *** |
| (−4.01) | (−4.21) | (−4.25) | |
| Primary caregiver of first child (basic group: mother care) | −0.011 *** | −0.076 *** | −0.162 *** |
| (−8.79) | (−9.62) | (−10.26) | |
| Other control variables | yes | yes | yes |
| Intercept | 0.334 *** | −2.064 *** | −3.820 *** |
| (3.16) | (−3.02) | (−2.91) | |
| Sample size | 7124 | 7124 | 7124 |
Note: *** indicate significance at the levels of 1%.
Having sons, real estate purchases, and migrant women’s overtime work.
| Variables | Model 16 | Model 17 |
|---|---|---|
| Having Sons | Having Daughters | |
| Marginal effect | Marginal effect | |
| Families without house (basic group: families with house) | 0.137 | 0.106 ** |
| (1.55) | (2.12) | |
| Labor contract (basic group: working without a labor contract) | −0.083 | −0.223 *** |
| (−1.28) | (−6.13) | |
| Medical insurance (basic group: involved no employees’ medical insurance) | −0.593 *** | −0.624 *** |
| (−5.39) | (−9.84) | |
| Other control variables | yes | yes |
| intercept | 5.685 *** | 2.950 *** |
| (3.89) | (3.33) | |
| Sample size | 12,050 | 14,499 |
Note: *** and ** indicate significance at the levels of 1% and 5%.
Endogenous analysis of the influence of having sons on migrant women’s overwork.
| Variables | Model 6 | Model 18 |
|---|---|---|
| Probit | 2SLS | |
| First stage regression | ||
| Provincial son preference in 2010 | 0.013 ** | |
| (2.03) | ||
| Second stage regression | ||
| Firstborn boy (basic group: firstborn girl) | 0.051 ** | 4.000 * |
| 1.95 | (1.73) | |
| Other control variables | YES | YES |
| Intercept | 2.343 *** | −6.069 *** |
| (4.27) | (−5.91) | |
| Wald’s test ( | - | 9.75 |
| Sample size | 18,520 | 26,550 |
Note: ***, **, and * indicate significance at the levels of 1%, 5%, 10%, respectively.
Overwork of migrant women in different age groups.
| Model 19 | Model 20 | Model 21 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20–35 Years Old | 35–44 Years Old | 45–59 Years Old | |
| Firstborn boy (basic group: firstborn girl) | 0.054 | 0.136 *** | 0.411 *** |
| (1.98) | (3.58) | (2.79) | |
| Other control variables | YES | YES | YES |
| Intercept | −4.591 *** | −2.210 *** | −3.318 ** |
| (−12.88) | (−10.95) | (−2.95) | |
| Sample size | 20,046 | 9339 | 603 |
Note: *** and **, indicate significance at the levels of 1% and 5%.