| Literature DB >> 35742097 |
Marwan Rasmi Issa1,2, Noor Awanis Muslim2, Raed Hussam Alzoubi3, Mu'taman Jarrar4,5, Modhi A Alkahtani1, Mohammad Al-Bsheish6, Arwa Alumran7, Ammar K Alomran8.
Abstract
Background: Pain management, a crucial part of nursing care, is considered one of the most basic patient rights. To properly treat patients' pain, nurses need a high degree of pain management awareness (PMA). The researchers hypothesized that nurses' pain management awareness is affected by their emotional intelligence (EI). Purpose: Because there is a dearth of studies on this topic, the purpose of this study was to describe the relationship between emotional intelligence and pain management awareness in a sample of nurses.Entities:
Keywords: emotional intelligence; pain management awareness
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742097 PMCID: PMC9222258 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10061047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1Research framework on the relationship between emotional intelligence and nurses pain management awareness.
Sample Profile.
| Items | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 99 | 30.0 |
| Female | 231 | 70.0 |
| Age | ||
| Less than 25 years | 33 | 10.0 |
| 25–34 years | 143 | 43.3 |
| 35–44 years | 110 | 33.3 |
| 45–54 years | 44 | 13.3 |
| Marital Status | ||
| Single | 88 | 26.7 |
| Married | 242 | 73.3 |
| Educational Level | ||
| diploma/high diploma | 66 | 20.0 |
| Bachelor | 242 | 73.3 |
| Master | 22 | 6.7 |
| Working Experience | ||
| Less than 3 years | 22 | 6.7 |
| 3–6 years | 154 | 46.7 |
| 7–10 years | 110 | 33.3 |
| 11–14 years | 44 | 13.3 |
| Area | ||
| Medical Ward | 55 | 16.7 |
| Surgical Ward | 44 | 13.3 |
| Oncology Ward | 55 | 16.7 |
| Intensive Care Unit | 77 | 23.3 |
| Emergency Room | 55 | 16.7 |
| Operation Room | 44 | 13.3 |
Reliability Analysis.
| Variables | No. of Items | Cronbach Alpha | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Management Awareness (PMA) | 21 | 0.983 | 3.668 | 0.811 |
| Self-Emotional Appraisal (SEA) | 4 | 0.894 | 3.651 | 0.763 |
| Others Emotional Appraisal (OEA) | 4 | 0.875 | 3.630 | 0.777 |
| Use of Emotion (UOE) | 4 | 0.869 | 3.701 | 0.870 |
| Regulation of Emotion (ROE) | 4 | 0.897 | 3.585 | 0.826 |
Note: M—mean, SD—standard deviation.
Pearson Correlation Matrix.
| Variables | SEA_Mean | OEA_Mean | UOE_Mean | ROE_Mean | PMA_Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA_mean | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.663 ** | 0.666 ** | 0.691 ** | 0.251 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | |
| OEA_mean | Pearson Correlation | 0.663 ** | 1 | 0.691 ** | 0.658 ** | 0.216 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | |
| UOE_mean | Pearson Correlation | 0.666 ** | 0.691 ** | 1 | 0.556 ** | 0.247 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
| N | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | |
| ROE_mean | Pearson Correlation | 0.691 ** | 0.658 ** | 0.556 ** | 1 | 0.182 ** |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | ||
| N | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | |
| PMA_mean | Pearson Correlation | 0.251 ** | 0.216 ** | 0.247 ** | 0.182 ** | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | ||
| N | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | 330 | |
Note ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
ANOVA.
| Model | Sum of Square | Df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 14.315 | 1 | 14.315 | 23.239 | 0.000 |
| Residual | 202.047 | 328 | 0.615 | ||
| Total | 216.363 | 329 |
Dependent variable: PMA_mean; Predictors (constant): EI_mean.
Examining Results of Direct Effects of the Constructs by (AMOS).
| Path | Unstandardized Estimate | Standardised Estimate | Critical Ration (c.r.) | Hypothesis Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | S.E. | Beta | ||||
| EI→PMA | 0.327 | 0.061 | 0.314 *** | 5.353 | 0.000 | Supported |
*** p < 0.001.