| Literature DB >> 35741606 |
Qianyun Chen1, Jill Abrigo1, Wanting Liu2, Elyia Yixun Han2, David Ka Wai Yeung1, Lin Shi1, Lisa Wing Chi Au2, Min Deng1, Sirong Chen3, Eric Yim Lung Leung3, Chi Lai Ho3, Vincent Chung Tong Mok2, Winnie Chiu Wing Chu1.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) was recently defined as a biological construct to reflect neuropathologic status, and both abnormal amyloid and tau are required for a diagnosis of AD. We aimed to determine the proton MR spectroscopic (1H-MRS) patterns of the posterior cingulate in biologically defined AD. A total of 68 participants were included in this study, comprising 37 controls, 16 early AD, and 15 late AD, who were classified according to their amyloid and tau status and presence of hippocampal atrophy. Compared with controls, early AD showed lower N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr) (p = 0.003), whereas late AD showed lower NAA/Cr and higher myoInositol (mI)/Cr (all with p < 0.05). Lower NAA/Cr correlated with a greater global amyloid load (r = -0.47, p < 0.001) and tau load (r = -0.51, p < 0.001) and allowed a discrimination of early AD from controls (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that NAA/Cr also allowed a differentiation of early AD from controls in the cognitively unimpaired subjects, with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.96, 100%, and 83.8%, respectively. Lower posterior cingulate NAA levels may help to inform underlying neuropathologic changes in the early stage of AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; N-acetylaspartate; magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741606 PMCID: PMC9220959 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12060722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Figure 1(a) Example of the 1H-MRS voxel localization. (b) MR proton spectra. mI, myoInositol; Cho, choline-containing compound; Cr, creatine; GSH, glutathione; Glx, glutamate and glutamine; NAA, N-acetylaspartate; ppm, parts per million [17].
Demographic characteristics and imaging data of controls, early AD and late AD groups.
| Control | Early AD | Late AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CU/CI ( | 37/0 | 4/12 | 0/15 | <0.001 a,b |
| Female, | 21 (56.8%) | 11 (68.8%) | 11 (73.3%) | 0.46 |
| Age (years) | 64.9 (6.4) | 66.9 (8.9) | 70.5 (5.5) | 0.04 b |
| Education (years) | 9.9 (3.7) | 10.7 (1.1) | 9.4 (1.1) | 0.78 |
| HKLLT | 0.25 (−1.08, 0.71) | −1.80 (−2.19, −0.91) | −2.03 (−2.24, −2.03) | <0.001 a,b |
| MoCA | 25.58 (3.55) | 21.81 (5.88) | 15.07 (4.61) | <0.001 b,c |
| Global PIB retention | 1.26 (0.05) | 1.58 (0.17) | 1.68 (0.20) | <0.001 a,b |
| Global T807 SUVR | 1.03 (0.07) | 1.23 (0.22) | 1.27 (0.19) | <0.001 a,b |
| Hippocampal fraction (%) | 0.58 (0.09) | 0.50 (0.07) | 0.40 (0.05) | <0.001 b,c |
Values are expressed as mean with standard deviation for normal distribution data, otherwise expressed as median with interquartile range. AD: Alzheimer’s disease; CU: cognitively unimpaired; CI: cognitively impaired; HKLLT: Hong Kong List Learning Test; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment score; PIB: 11C-Pittsburgh compound B tracer; T807: 18F-flortaucipir; SUVR: standardized uptake value ratio. a Statistically significant difference between controls versus early AD (p < 0.05); b Statistically significant difference between controls versus late AD (p < 0.05); c Statistically significant difference between early AD versus late AD (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Comparison of MRS metabolite levels across groups. The bars show the median and inter-quartile range. NAA/Cr was significantly different between the control and early AD groups and between the control and late AD groups. mI/Cr was significantly different between the control and late AD groups.
Association between MRS metabolite ratios and PIB retention and T807 SUVR in the whole sample of participants.
| Global PIB Retention | Global T807 SUVR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| NAA/Cr | −0.47 * | <0.001 | −0.51 * | <0.001 |
| mI/Cr | 0.39 * | 0.001 | 0.47 * | <0.001 |
* Correlation is considered significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). PIB: 11C-Pittsburgh compound B tracer; T807: 18F-flortaucipir tracer; SUVR: standardized uptake value ratio.
Figure 3ROC curves of different metrics (hippocampal fraction (HF), NAA/Cr and mI/Cr) for the classification of (a) control vs. early AD groups, (b) control vs. late AD groups, (c) early AD vs. late AD groups, and (d) control vs. early AD in 41 cognitively unimpaired (CU) subjects. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for each metric is shown. All metrics allowed a differentiation between the control and late AD groups. Only HF allowed a differentiation between the early AD and late AD groups, whereas only NAA/Cr allowed differentiation between the control and early AD groups. NAA/Cr also allowed the detection of early AD in the CU group.
Performance of metabolite ratios in classification among groups.
| AUC (95% CI) | SE | Optimal Cutoff † | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control vs. Early AD ( | |||||||
| HF | 0.72 (0.56–0.87) | 0.08 | 0.01 * | 0.49 | 81.1 | 43.8 | 97.3 |
| NAA/Cr | 0.80 (0.63–0.97) | 0.09 | <0.001 * | 1.14 | 83.0 | 81.3 | 83.8 |
| mI/Cr | 0.63 (0.45–0.81) | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.67 | 67.9 | 62.5 | 70.3 |
| Control vs. Late AD ( | |||||||
| HF | 0.99 (0.96–1) | 0.01 | <0.001 * | 0.45 | 96.2 | 93.3 | 97.3 |
| NAA/Cr | 0.79 (0.62–0.96) | 0.08 | <0.01 * | 1.07 | 88.5 | 60.0 | 100 |
| mI/Cr | 0.70 (0.54–0.86) | 0.08 | 0.02 * | 0.66 | 67.3 | 66.7 | 67.6 |
| Early AD vs. Late AD ( | |||||||
| HF | 0.86 (0.73–0.99) | 0.07 | <0.01 * | 0.44 | 80.7 | 86.7 | 75.0 |
| NAA/Cr | 0.56 (0.35–0.77) | 0.11 | 0.11 | 1.07 | 61.3 | 60.0 | 62.5 |
| mI/Cr | 0.57 (0.36–0.77) | 0.11 | 0.51 | 0.73 | 61.3 | 46.7 | 75.0 |
| Control vs. Early AD in the CU group ( | |||||||
| HF | 0.68 (0.43–0.94) | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.60 | 41.5 | 100 | 35.1 |
| NAA/Cr | 0.96 (0.88–1) | 0.04 | <0.01 * | 1.14 | 85.4 | 100 | 83.8 |
| mI/Cr | 0.69 (0.51–0.87) | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.63 | 53.7 | 100 | 48.6 |
† Youden index-derived cutoff; * Significant at p < 0.05 level; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; HF, hippocampal fraction; CU, cognitively unimpaired.