| Literature DB >> 35741545 |
Ruimin Shi1,2, Bukang Wang2, Zongyan Wang1, Jiquan Liu2, Xinyu Feng1, Lei Dong1.
Abstract
Due to the influence of signal-to-noise ratio in the early failure stage of rolling bearings in rotating machinery, it is difficult to effectively extract feature information. Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) has been widely used to decompose vibration signals which can reflect more fault omens. In order to improve the efficiency and accuracy, a method to optimize VMD by using the Niche Genetic Algorithm (NGA) is proposed in this paper. In this method, the optimal Shannon entropy of modal components in a VMD algorithm is taken as the optimization objective, by using the NGA to constantly update and optimize the combination of influencing parameters composed of α and K so as to minimize the local minimum entropy. According to the obtained optimization results, the optimal input parameters of the VMD algorithm were set. The method mentioned is applied to the fault extraction of a simulated signal and a measured signal of a rolling bearing. The decomposition process of the rolling-bearing fault signal was transferred to the variational frame by the NGA-VMD algorithm, and several eigenmode function components were obtained. The energy feature extracted from the modal component containing the main fault information was used as the input vector of a particle swarm optimized support vector machine (PSO-SVM) and used to identify the fault type of the rolling bearing. The analysis results of the simulation signal and measured signal show that: the NGA-VMD algorithm can decompose the vibration signal of a rolling bearing accurately and has a better robust performance and correct recognition rate than the VMD algorithm. It can highlight the local characteristics of the original sample data and reduce the interference of the parameters selected artificially in the VMD algorithm on the processing results, improving the fault-diagnosis efficiency of rolling bearings.Entities:
Keywords: Shannon entropy; fault diagnosis; rolling bearing; the Niche Genetic Algorithm; variational mode decomposition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741545 PMCID: PMC9223188 DOI: 10.3390/e24060825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.738
Figure 1Time-domain waveform of the original simulation signal (a) and its component signals (b).
Figure 2Minimum entropy diagram of different number of evolutional generations in optimization process.
Figure 3Time-domain diagram (a) and frequency-domain diagram (b) of VMD.
Figure 4Time-domain diagram (a) and frequency-domain diagram (b) of NGA-VMD.
Figure 5Flow chart of diagnosis.
Figure 6The test bench for the bearing fault experiment.
Parameters of the testing bearing.
| Middle Diameter of Bearing | Diameter of the Roller | Contact Angle | Number of Rollers |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38.5 mm | 8 mm | 0° | 9 |
Parameters of the experiment.
| Rotational Speed | Diameter of Fault Point | Sampling Frequency | Initial Number of Sampling Point |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1797 r/min | 0.1778 mm | 12 kHz | 2048 |
Figure 7Time domain diagram (a) and spectrum diagram (b) of different bearing states.
Figure 8Time-domain diagram (a) and spectrum diagram (b) of IMFs component obtained using NGA-VMD for inner ring fault signal.
Average entropy of signal at different sampling points.
| Sampling Points | Average Entropy |
|---|---|
| 512 | 0.863 |
| 1024 | 0.851 |
| 2048 | 0.644 |
| 4086 | 0.631 |
| 8192 | 0.620 |
Figure 9Parameter optimization under four kinds of bearing conditions.
Results for searching optimization.
| State | Local Minimum Entropy | (K, α) |
|---|---|---|
| NOR | 0.5602 | (4, 860) |
| IRF | 0.5998 | (7, 1000) |
| ORF | 0.5473 | (9, 1200) |
| REF | 0.5728 | (5, 600) |
T values of partial bearings in four states.
| State | Sample | T | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| NOR | 1 | 0.2159 | 0.3151 | 0.2621 | 0.2319 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 0.2239 | 0.3381 | 0.2113 | 0.2245 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| IRF | 1 | 0.1023 | 0.1802 | 0.2634 | 0.3011 | 0.3689 | 0.3731 | 0.3623 | — | — |
| 2 | 0.1076 | 0.1864 | 0.2788 | 0.2193 | 0.3514 | 0.3677 | 0.3799 | — | — | |
| ORF | 1 | 0.1143 | 0.2001 | 0.3114 | 0.2987 | 0.4567 | 0.4312 | 0.4501 | 0.3644 | 0.3127 |
| 2 | 0.1533 | 0.2409 | 0.3002 | 0.3233 | 0.4763 | 0.4772 | 0.3986 | 0.3876 | 0.3321 | |
| REF | 1 | 0.1556 | 0.2192 | 0.4018 | 0.4871 | 0.1984 | — | — | — | — |
| 2 | 0.1848 | 0.2997 | 0.3851 | 0.4639 | 0.1869 | — | — | — | — | |
Fault classification and identification results for rolling bearings under different signal processing modes.
| State | NOR | IRF | ORF | REF | Average Accuracy | Running Time/s | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of samples | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 99.17% | 95.8 | ||
| Signal processing | NGA-VMD | NOR | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| IRF | 0 | 30 | 0 | 1 | ||||
| ORF | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | ||||
| REF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | ||||
| Classification accuracy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96.67% | ||||
| GOA-VMD | NOR | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 97.50% | 103.1 | |
| IRF | 0 | 29 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ORF | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | ||||
| REF | 0 | 1 | 0 | 29 | ||||
| Classification accuracy | 100% | 96.67% | 96.67% | 96.67% | ||||
| VMD | NOR | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 94.17% | 143.6 | |
| IRF | 0 | 29 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| ORF | 0 | 1 | 28 | 4 | ||||
| REF | 0 | 0 | 2 | 26 | ||||
| Classification accuracy | 100% | 96.67% | 93.33% | 86.67% | ||||
| EMD | NOR | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87.50% | 171.9 | |
| IRF | 0 | 26 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| ORF | 0 | 4 | 25 | 2 | ||||
| REF | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | ||||
| Classification accuracy | 100% | 86.67% | 83.33% | 80.00% | ||||
Figure 10Comparison of fault recognition rate of four algorithms.
Figure 11Fault recognition rate under different proportions of training samples.