| Literature DB >> 35741472 |
Mengjiao Wang1, Wenjie Wang1, Xinan Zhang2, Herbert Ho-Ching Iu2.
Abstract
The rolling bearing is a crucial component of the rotating machine, and it is particularly vital to ensure its normal operation. In addition, the selection of different category features will add uncertainty and bias to the classification results. In order to decrease the interference of these factors to fault diagnosis, a new method that automatically learns the features of the data combined with Markov transition field (MTF) and convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed in this paper, namely MTF-CNN. The MTF contributes to convert the original time series into corresponding figures, and the CNN is used to extract the deep feature information in the figure to complete the fault diagnosis. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by two public data sets. The experimental results show that MTF-CNN can classify different types of faults, and the highest accuracy rate can reach 100%. Likewise, the classification accuracy of this method is higher than some existing methods.Entities:
Keywords: Markov transition field; convolutional neural network; fault diagnosis; feature extraction; rolling bearing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741472 PMCID: PMC9221820 DOI: 10.3390/e24060751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Entropy (Basel) ISSN: 1099-4300 Impact factor: 2.738
Figure 1The flow chart of the MTF.
Figure 2CNN model structure.
The parameters of CNN.
| Layer | CNN Models | Kernel Size | Padding | Stride |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Conv |
| 1 | 1 |
|
| Maxpool |
| No | 1 |
|
| Conv |
| 1 | 1 |
|
| Maxpool |
| No | 1 |
|
| Conv |
| 1 | 1 |
|
| Maxpool |
| No | 1 |
|
| Conv |
| 1 | 1 |
|
| Maxpool |
| No | 1 |
|
| FCl | 256 | - | - |
Figure 3The flow chart of the MTF-CNN.
Figure 4CWRU bearing platform.
Figure 5Waveforms of vibration signal in four conditions. (a) The diagram of time domain. (b) The diagram of frequency domain.
Figure 6The converted images on four fault conditions.
Figure 7The confusion matrix of CNN in CWRU data set. (a) The highest classification result. (b) The lowest classification result.
The accuracy of six methods.
| Method | Highest Accuracy | Lowest Accuracy | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTF-CNN |
|
|
|
| LSTM |
|
|
|
| FE-LSTM |
|
|
|
| SVM |
|
|
|
| FE-SVM |
|
|
|
Figure 8Waveforms of vibration signal in three conditions. (a) The diagram of time domain. (b) The diagram of frequency domain.
Figure 9The converted images on three fault conditions.
Figure 10The confusion matrix of CNN in MFPT data set.
The accuracy of six methods.
| Method | Highest Accuracy | Lowest Accuracy | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTF-CNN |
|
|
|
| LSTM |
|
|
|
| FE-LSTM |
|
|
|
| SVM |
|
|
|
| FE-SVM |
|
|
|