| Literature DB >> 35741371 |
Pervaiz Akhter1, Zafar Iqbal Khan1, Muhammad Iftikhar Hussain2, Kafeel Ahmad1, Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan3, Asma Ashfaq1, Usman Khalid Chaudhry4, Muhammad Fahad Ullah5, Zainul Abideen6, Khalid S Almaary7, Mona S Alwahibi7, Mohamed Soliman Elshikh7.
Abstract
In South Asia, the high costs of synthetic fertilizers have imposed research on alternative nutrient inputs. We aimed to identify potential trace elements (PTE) present in some organic manure that might be a source of environmental pollutions and risk to public health following consumption. The study aims to evaluate how different organic waste (poultry waste, PW; press mud, PM; and farmyard manure, FYM) influences the heavy metal migration in soil, the accumulation in garlic, and their potential health risks. Organic waste caused a higher accumulation of certain metals (Zn, Cu, Fe, and Co), whereas Mn, Cd, Cr, and Pb were in lower concentrations in soil. Amendments of soil with PM revealed a higher accumulation of Cd, Cr, Fe, and Pb, whereas PW resulted in Cu and Zn accumulation in garlic. Treatment of soil with FYM exhibited higher metal concentration of Co and Mn. An environmental hazard indices study revealed that pollution load index (PLI) was highest for Cu following treatment with PM. The health risk index (HRI) was greater for Cd following amendment with PM. Maximum daily intake of metals (DIM) was observed for Zn after treatment with PW. The Pb exhibited maximum bioconcentration factor (BCF) in PM-amended plants. Based on these findings, we concluded that garlic grown on contaminated soil with organic waste may pose serious health hazards following consumption.Entities:
Keywords: garlic; health risk; heavy metal; organic manures
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741371 PMCID: PMC9220309 DOI: 10.3390/biology11060850
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Heavy metal concentrations in soil and Allium Sativum L. (mg kg−1).
| Metal (mg kg−1) | Treatments | MPL (mg kg−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PW | PM | FYM | ||
|
| |||||
| Cd | 0.448 ± 0.003 | 0.332 ± 0.068 | 0.457 ± 0.004 | 0.394 ± 0.011 | 0.5 |
| Co | 0.537 ± 0.0026 | 0.455 ± 0.093 | 0.562 ± 0.056 | 0.488 ± 0.005 | 1 |
| Cr | 0.135 ± 0.014 | 0.146 ± 0.004 | 0.779 ± 0.006 | 0.189 ± 0.004 | 50 |
| Cu | 1.222 ± 0.006 | 1.310 ± 0.041 | 1.251 ± 0.006 | 1.254 ± 0.005 | 20 |
| Fe | 0.179 ± 0.015 | 0.126 ± 0.020 | 0.108 ± 0.016 | 0.141 ± 0.016 | 10 |
| Mn | 1.868 ± 0.759 | 5.682 ± 0.150 | 5.682 ± 0.150 | 0.7196 ± 0.013 | 1000 |
| Pb | 0.537 ± 0.006 | 0.023 ± 0.004 | 0.082 ± 0.032 | 0.0529 ± 0.027 | 30 |
| Zn | 4.535 ± 0.57 | 17.633 ± 1.120 | 12.69 ± 0.022 | 10.713 ± 2.714 | 50 |
|
| |||||
| Cd | 0.444 ± 0.007 | 0.459 ± 0.004 | 0.495 ± 0.012 | 0.457 ± 0.011 | 0.5 |
| Co | 0.402 ± 0.028 | 0.442 ± 0.017 | 0.411 ± 0.033 | 0.463 ± 0.022 | 1 |
| Cr | 0.298 ± 0.158 | 0.169 ± 0.004 | 0.381 ± 0.159 | 0.272 ± 0.123 | 50 |
| Cu | 1.152 ± 0.008 | 1.151 ± 0.005 | 1.130 ± 0.020 | 1.189 ± 0.002 | 20 |
| Fe | 0.192 ± 0.003 | 0.311 ± 0.023 | 0.966 ± 0.657 | 0.187 ± 0.012 | 10 |
| Mn | 2.949 ± 0.534 | 3.472 ± 0.900 | 3.458 ± 0.940 | 5.682 ± 0.150 | 1000 |
| Pb | 0.327 ± 0.050 | 0.052 ± 0.0192 | 0.501 ± 0.162 | 0.488 ± 0.188 | 30 |
| Zn | 16.04 ± 0.031 | 18.28 ± 0.804 | 9.348 ± 3.22 | 4.535 ± 0.571 | 50 |
Source: From [33], MPL: maximum permissible limit, SE: Standard Error, C control, PM poultry waste, P press mud, FYM farmyard manure.
Analysis of variance (p values) of heavy metal concentrations in soil and A. sativum.
| Metals | Soil | Plant |
|---|---|---|
| Cd | 5.516 * | 0.003 ** |
| Co | 1.163 ns | 0.005 * |
| Cr | 2.114 *** | 0.046 * |
| Cu | 2.372 * | 0.004 ** |
| Pb | 12.984 ** | 0.831 * |
| Fe | 60.111ns | 8.918 ** |
| Mn | 2.724 * | 0.262 ** |
| Zn | 711.514 ** | 237.171 *** |
** significant at 0.001 level, * significant and *** highly significant, ns = non-significant.
Figure 1Principal component analysis of mean values of metal accumulated in soil samples. It is a is a combination of score plot of metal ions (represented as dots) and loading plot of treatments (represented as vectors). FYM: farmyard manure, PW: poultry waste, PM: press mud.
Figure 2Dendrogram of 8 metals (copper, cobalt, chromium, cadmium, lead, iron, manganese, zinc) based on different treatment groups (poultry waste, press mud, and farmyard manure) from soil samples. It was generated with a hierarchical cluster analysis with Average Linkage (between groups).
Figure 3Principal component analysis of mean values of metal accumulated in garlic plants. It is a combination of score plot of metal ions (represented as dots) and loading plot of treatments (represented as vectors). FYM: farmyard manure, PW: poultry waste, PM: Press mud.
Figure 4Dendrogram of 8 metals (copper, cobalt, chromium, cadmium, lead, iron, manganese, zinc) based on different treatment groups (poultry waste, press mud, and farmyard manure) from garlic plant. It was generated with a hierarchical cluster analysis with Average Linkage (between groups).
Bioconcentration factor for A. sativum/soil.
| Metals | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | PW | PM | FYM | |
| Cd | 1.9103 | 5.40 | 3.245902 | 1.322338 |
| Co | 0.069 | 0.984 | 0.309573 | 0.18898 |
| Cr | 0.437 | 2.608 | 1.970213 | 0.788406 |
| Cu | 1.68 | 1.23 | 0.192482 | 0.305656 |
| Pb | 3.58 | 3.273 | 25.76 | 3.351254 |
| Fe | 0.172 | 1.628136 | 1.199653 | 1.592935 |
| Mn | 1.900 | 0.034899 | 1.027692 | 2.076 |
| Zn | 2.40 | 0.80952 | 2.002892 | 0.428801 |
Pollution load index for heavy metals in soil grown with A. sativum.
| Metals | Treatments | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | PW | PM | FYM | |
| Cd | 0.1560 | 0.057 | 0.102 | 0.231 |
| Co | 0.6387 | 0.049 | 0.238 | 0.269 |
| Cr | 0.455 | 0.043 | 0.156 | 0.23 |
| Cu | 0.0813 | 0.110 | 0.700 | 0.463 |
| Pb | 0.0006 | 0.037 | 0.050 | 0.062 |
| Fe | 0.2998 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Mn | 0.1509 | 0.511 | 0.105 | 0.239 |
| Zn | 0.3861 | 0.226 | 0.099 | 0.511 |
Daily intake and health risk index for consumption of A. sativum.
| Metals | Treatments | C | PW | PM | FYM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DIM | 0.0025 | 0.0026 | 0.0028 | 0.00267 |
| HRI | 2.5972 | 2.6849 | 2.8944 | 2.67228 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0023 | 0.0025 | 0.0028 | 0.00270 |
| HRI | 0.0547 | 0.0602 | 0.0912 | 0.06296 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0017 | 0.0009 | 0.0027 | 0.00159 |
| HRI | 0.0011 | 0.0006 | 0.0018 | 0.00106 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0067 | 0.0067 | 0.0066 | 0.00693 |
| HRI | 0.1685 | 0.1683 | 0.1653 | 0.17381 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0011 | 0.0018 | 0.0056 | 0.00109 |
| HRI | 0.3222 | 0.5195 | 1.6138 | 0.31242 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0172 | 0.0203 | 0.0202 | 0.03322 |
| HRI | 0.0246 | 0.0290 | 0.0288 | 0.04746 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0019 | 0.0003 | 0.0546 | 0.00285 |
| HRI | 0.0246 | 0.0074 | 0.0714 | 0.06959 | |
|
| DIM | 0.0938 | 0.1069 | 0.0546 | 0.02651 |
| HRI | 0.2535 | 0.2889 | 0.1477 | 0.07167 |