| Literature DB >> 35741338 |
Pablo Valdés-Badilla1,2, Tomás Herrera-Valenzuela3, Eduardo Guzmán-Muñoz4, Braulio Henrique Magnani Branco5, José Zapata-Bastias2, Boris Lucero6, Franklin Castillo-Retamal1.
Abstract
This study protocol aims to analyze and compare the effects of an adapted taekwondo program with respect to multi-component training and walking exercise on health status in independent older women. Secondarily, we analyze the variability of the inter-individual response and compare it according to the designated training system. The sample will consist of 64 women between 60 and 65 years, randomly assigned to experimental group 1 (n = 16; adapted taekwondo), experimental group 2 (n = 16; multi-component training), experimental group 3 (n = 16, walking exercise) or control group (n = 16; no intervention). The experimental groups will perform the designated training for three sessions (60 min per session) per week over 16-weeks, while the control group will not receive any treatment. The main outcome will provide information about (i) blood pressure, (ii) lipid profile, (iii) frequency of food consumption, (iv) body composition, (v) cognitive status, (vi) brain activity, (vii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and (viii) physical-functional fitness. Our hypothesis indicates that adapted taekwondo produces more significant effects and greater inter-individual responses in cognitive status, brain activity, HRQoL, and postural balance than the others training methods. If this intervention proves effective, it could be an alternative for older women.Entities:
Keywords: active aging; combat sports; older adults; physical activity; public health
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741338 PMCID: PMC9220114 DOI: 10.3390/biology11060816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Study flowchart. Legends: CG: Control group (no intervention). MCT: multi-component training. n: number of participants. TKD: Adapted taekwondo. WE: Walking exercise.
Progression for intervention (Training volume and intensity).
| Program | Month | Weeks | Frequency (Weekly) | Total Time Per Session (min) | Exercise | Set | Rep | Rest | Intensity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TKD | 1 | 1–4 | 3 | 60 | UL | 3 | 8 | 2 min | 50–70% HRmax |
| LL | |||||||||
| Poomsae | --- | 6 | |||||||
| 2 | 5–8 | UL | 4 | 8 | |||||
| LL | |||||||||
| Poomsae | --- | 6 | |||||||
| 3 | 9–12 | UL | 4 | 12 | |||||
| LL | |||||||||
| Poomsae | --- | 6 | |||||||
| 4 | 13–16 | UL | 4 | 12 | 90 s | ||||
| LL | |||||||||
| Poomsae | --- | 6 | |||||||
| MCT | 1 | 1–4 | 60 | RT | 3 | 10 | 2 min | OMNI-RES (5–8 points) | |
| CF | 50–70% HRmax | ||||||||
| APC | |||||||||
| 2 | 5–8 | RT | 4 | 10 | OMNI-RES (5–8 points) | ||||
| CF | 50–70% HRmax | ||||||||
| APC | |||||||||
| 3 | 9–12 | RT | 4 | 12 | OMNI-RES (5–8 points) | ||||
| CF | 50–70% HRmax | ||||||||
| APC | |||||||||
| 4 | 13–16 | RT | 90 s | OMNI-RES (5–8 points) | |||||
| CF | 50–70% HRmax | ||||||||
| APC | |||||||||
| WE | 1 | 1–4 | 45 | --- | --- | --- | --- | 50–70% HRmax | |
| 2 | 5–8 | 50 | --- | --- | --- | ---- | |||
| 3 | 9–12 | 55 | --- | --- | --- | ---- | |||
| 4 | 13–16 | 60 | --- | --- | --- | ---- | |||
| Control group | 1–4 | 16 | Will be asked to maintain their usual activities of daily living. | ||||||
APC: Agility and postural control. CF: Cardiorespiratory fitness. HRmax: Maximum heart rate. LL: Lower limbs. MCT: Multi-component training. OMNI-RES: OMNI-Resistance Exercise Scale of perceived exertion. Poomsae: Sequence of arm and leg movements that simulate imaginary combat. Rep: Repetitions. RT: Resistance training. TKD: Adapted taekwondo. UL: Upper limbs. WE: Walking exercise.
Figure 2Assessments and usual sessions of the intervention. Legends: CG: Control group. MCT: Multi-component training. TKD: Adapted taekwondo. WE: Walking exercise.