| Literature DB >> 35740919 |
Yuexin Ji1, Wenliang Song1, Lin Xu1, Deng-Guang Yu1,2, Sim Wan Annie Bligh3.
Abstract
The timely and effective control and repair of wound bleeding is a key research issue all over the world. From traditional compression hemostasis to a variety of new hemostatic methods, people have a more comprehensive understanding of the hemostatic mechanism and the structure and function of different types of wound dressings. Electrospun nanofibers stand out with nano size, high specific surface area, higher porosity, and a variety of complex structures. They are high-quality materials that can effectively promote wound hemostasis and wound healing because they can imitate the structural characteristics of the skin extracellular matrix (ECM) and support cell adhesion and angiogenesis. At the same time, combined with amino acid polymers with good biocompatibility not only has high compatibility with the human body but can also be combined with a variety of drugs to further improve the effect of wound hemostatic dressing. This paper summarizes the application of different amino acid electrospun wound dressings, analyzes the characteristics of different materials in preparation and application, and looks forward to the development of directions of poly(amino acid) electrospun dressings in hemostasis.Entities:
Keywords: amino acids; electrospinning; hemostasis; wound dressing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740919 PMCID: PMC9221312 DOI: 10.3390/biom12060794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Mechanism diagram of coagulation process. (A) Hemostatic simulation diagram of damaged vascular model; (B) an overview of the coagulation cascade.
Figure 2Four stages of wound healing. (A) Hemostasis; (B) inflammation; (C) proliferation; (D) remodeling.
Figure 3Statistics of literature retrieval on the “Web of Science” platform with the subject of “Electrospun wound dressing” and “Amino acid electrospun wound dressing”, respectively.
Figure 4Electrospinning device and classification of electrospinning according to fluid quantity and spinneret structure.
Figure 5Nanofibers and spinnerets with different structures. (A) SEM pictures of nanofibers with Janus structure [66]; (B) production process diagram of coaxial electrospinning [73]; (C) schematic diagram of three-layer coaxial electrospinning spinneret [77]; (D) new three-fluid electrospinning spinneret [78]; (E) SEM images of nanofibers with sheath-separate-core nano-structure, as indicated by the red (The PEL-PAR core) and blue arrows (The ES-PAR core) [78].
Key parameters affecting electrospinning.
| Spinning | Polymer molecular weight | The fiber diameter increases with the increase in polymer |
| Solvent evaporation rate | The faster the solvent evaporates, the greater the fiber diameter; the faster the solvent evaporates, the greater the fiber porosity and specific surface area; the slower the solvent evaporates, the less easy to remove the solvent residue | |
| Spinning solution viscosity | The higher the viscosity of the spinning solution, the easier it is to block the spinneret; the lower the viscosity, the smaller the fiber diameter, but too low will produce electrospray | |
| Conductivity of spinning solution | The larger the dielectric constant, the smaller the fiber diameter; the smaller the dielectric constant, the easier it is to produce beads of fiber | |
| Spinning | Spinning voltage | The higher the spinning voltage, the smaller the fiber size; too much voltage will lead to unstable spinning; too little voltage fiber diameter will be coarse, or even produce droplets |
| Liquid feeding speed | The larger the flow rate, the larger the fiber diameter, too large will produce droplets; low feed rate spinning process is easy to interrupt | |
| Collector | Influence the three-dimensional structure and arrangement of the product | |
| Distance between spinning head and collecting plate | Spacing is too small solvent cannot be fully evaporated; spacing is too large to affect the electric field strength, but also make the fiber is not easy to deposit and fly into the air | |
| Environmental parameters | Spinning environment temperature | Increasing the temperature increases the rate of solvent volatilization, and hollow nanofibers can be obtained by increasing the temperature |
| Spinning environment humidity | Elevated humidity reduces the rate of solvent evaporation, and nanocrystalline films can be obtained by increasing humidity |
Figure 6Amino acids and classification.
Figure 7Preparation and application of polar amino acid electrospun nanofibers. (A) Electrospun gelatin-glycerin-ε-poly-lysine nanofibers [95]; (B) SEM images of selected PVA/HA, PVA/HA/CNCs, and PVA/HA/CNCs/L-arginine NFs scaffolds [98]; (C) properties and biomedical applications of poly(aspartic acid) and its derivatives [111]; (D) SEM image of electrospun nanofiber [114]; (E) application of procedure of PASP [112]; (F) Release curve of GS-Rg3 from fiber [106].
Electrospinning conditions and characteristics of common polar amino acids.
| Amino Acids | Additional | Solvent | Electrospun Technique | Characteristic | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lysine | Gelatin/glycerin | Acetic acid | Blend | Excellent antibacterial ability against Listeria monocytogenes, a promising food packaging material | [ |
| PAA/PVA | Distilled water | Blend | Long-lasting antibacterial activity with good biocompatibility | [ | |
| PAN | DCM/DMF | Blend | High biocompatibility and potential for culturing heart cells | [ | |
| PAA | Distilled water | Blend | The addition of polylysine enhances the mechanical strength and stability of PAA | [ | |
| PLLA/PPY | HFIP | Coaxial | Stable electrical properties, good biocompatibility, high cell adhesion rate | [ | |
| Glutamic acid | PLGA | TFA | Blend | Promotes wound healing and prevents tissue adhesions | [ |
| Cystamine | TFA | Blend | Good water stability | [ | |
| OXA | Ethanol/water/ | Blend | Good mechanical properties and similar to skin, with certain moisture absorption properties | [ | |
| PEG | Distilled water | Blend | Uniform nanofiber diameter | [ | |
| PEO | Distilled water | Blend | Promotes cell adhesion and proliferation and inhibits proliferative scarring | [ | |
| PVA | Distilled water | Blend | Promotes cell adhesion and can be used as a tissue engineering scaffold | [ | |
| PCL | HFIP | Blend | Improves the solubility of florfenicol (FF) and promotes the in vitro release of the drug | [ | |
| Aspartic acid | PSI | — | Blend | Strong adsorption of metal ions and reduced water solubility after cross-linking, can be used as a colorimetric sensor for aqueous solutions | [ |
| PSI | DMF | Blend | A biocompatible fiber scaffold | [ | |
| PSI/PEO/THD | DMF | Coaxial | pH sensitive for smart drug release applications | [ | |
| Arginine | PVA/HA | Distilled water | Blend | Accelerates wound healing and tissue regeneration | [ |
| Glycine | PVA | Distilled water | Blend | High specific surface area for bio-scaffold and drug transport applications | [ |
Figure 8Application effect of nonpolar amino acid electrospun nanofibers. (A) H&E staining of the wound section, NE: new epidermis, GT: granulation tissue, ND: new dermis [123]; (B) confocal laser scanning microscope images of HUVECs cultured on chiral hybrid scaffolds [124]; (C) morphology and CA of PolyPhe nonwoven fabric after alkali treatment [125].
Electrospinning conditions and characteristics of common nonpolar amino acids.
| Amino Acids | Additional | Solvent | Electrospun Technique | Characteristic | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenylalanine | PCL | HFIP | Blend | Cell adhesion is good and can be applied to vascular endothelial remodeling | [ |
| / | TFA/CHCl3 | Blend | Super hydrophobic material to ensure stable adhesion of droplets | [ | |
| Alanine | P3HB | HFIP | Blend | Good biocompatibility and mechanical properties, conducive to cell adhesion and proliferation | [ |
| Tryptophan | L-phenylalanine | HFIP | Blend | Treat wound infection and promote wound healing | [ |
Figure 9Application effect of poly(amino acid) electrospun nanofibers. (A) Photographs of wounds at different time intervals after treatment with different environments and materials [140]; (B) bacterial growth inhibition halos against Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli for PVA/L-H and PVA/L-H/Ag nanofibers [141]; (C) characterization of the IBP and LO in vitro release profile at pH 5 and pH 8 [142]; (D) SEM images showing the cell–biomaterial interactions on day 10 and day 15 on PLLA/PAA/Col I&III nanofibers [144]; (E) wound healing in the experimental and control groups at different times [149]; (F) three-dimensional micro-computed tomography reconstructed images of PAsp nanofibrous membrane treatment at 4 and 8 weeks postoperatively, the diameter of calvarial-defect model is 6 mm [159].