| Literature DB >> 35740815 |
Katharina Jäckle1,2, Sebastian Lippross3, Theresa Elisabeth Michel1, Johannes T Kowallick4, Christian Dullin4,5, Katja A Lüders1, Heiko M Lorenz1, Konstantinos Tsaknakis1, Anna K Hell1.
Abstract
(1) Background: Thermal ablation has been demonstrated to affect the bone growth of osteoid osteoma in adolescents. Growth modulation due to thermal heat in children is conceivable, but has not yet been established. We used lamb extremities as a preclinical model to examine the effect of thermal ablation on growth plates in order to evaluate its potential for axial or longitudinal growth modulation in pediatric patients. (2)Entities:
Keywords: accuracy; growth modulation; growth plate; histology; linseed sheep; thermal ablation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740815 PMCID: PMC9222192 DOI: 10.3390/children9060878
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Figure 1Hind leg separated from the stillborn female linseed sheep (a). Anatomical preparation through the muscles up to the appearance of the bone (b). The small red box marks the knee joint. The magnification in the dashed box shows a sagittal 3D overview in micro-CT imaging (a1), (a2) coronal sectioning, and (a3) sagittal sectioning through the knee joint. The small blue box marks the ankle. The magnification in the dashed box shows a sagittal 3D overview in the micro-CT imaging (a4), (a5) coronal sectioning, and (a6) sagittal sectioning through the ankle.
Results of targeting, distance measurements, and volume determination.
| Micro-CT | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| DFPR L1 | 4.69 | 5.97 | 5.58 |
| DFPR L2 | 0.78 | 5.73 | |
| PTPR L1 | 0.60 | 4.07 | 5.90 |
| DTPR L2 | 1.32 | 4.42 | |
| DFPL L1 | 1.97 | 8.05 | 7.31 |
| DFPL L2 | 0.68 | 6.56 | |
| PTPL L1 | 0.97 | 7.32 | 3.94 # |
| DTPL L1 | 0.78 | 4.64 | 6.26 |
| DRAR L1 | 0.45 | 5.31 | 9.33 |
| DRAL L1 | 0.46 | 4.01 | 4.13 |
| DRAL L2 | 0.48 | 4.24 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| DFPR L1 | 4.29 | 0.63 | 0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
DFPR = distal femur posterior right; PTPR = proximal tibia posterior right; DTPR = distal tibia posterior right; DFPL = distal femur posterior left; PTPL = proximal tibia posterior left; DTPL = distal tibia posterior left; DRAR = distal radius anterior right; DRAL = distal radius anterior left; L1 = lesion 1; L2 = lesion 2. # mean value was determined although the second value is likely due to an experimental error. [] ## as the difference between heating and only insertion of the electrocautery tip is close to four-fold, we assume that this measurement is due to an experimental error, i.e., insertion of the tip only, without heat applied.
Figure 2Micro-CT imaging of the left knee joint: (a) before ablation, (b) after ablation, and (c) after embedding in synthetic resin (*). Two ablation lesions (marked by white arrows). Error bars with units in mm.
Figure 3Sagittal section showing thermal lesions after electrocautery on the left side of the proximal tibia using H&E staining (a) and van Gieson staining (b). (a) The black dotted line shows thermal ablation lesion channel. The red box shows the magnification of the lesion channel ((a): scale bar 5 mm; (a.1): enlargement, scale bar 1 mm). (b) The same sectioning in van Gieson staining. The black dotted line shows the lesion channel. The red box shows the magnification of the lesion channel ((b): scale bar 5 mm; (b.1): enlargement, scale bar 1 mm).
Figure 4Volume of lesions measured using micro-CT. The volume of lesions are shown [mm3] on the y-axis and the lesion locations on the different extremities are shown on the x-axis. The black dashed line indicates the average.