| Literature DB >> 35740671 |
Stephanie N Shishido1, Alireza Ghoreifi2, Salmaan Sayeed1, George Courcoubetis1, Amy Huang1, Brandon Ye1, Sankalp Mrutyunjaya1, Inderbir S Gill2,3, Peter Kuhn1,2,3,4, Jeremy Mason1,2,3, Hooman Djaladat2,3.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinomas (UCs) are a broad and heterogeneous group of malignancies, with the prevalence of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) being rare, accounting for only 5-10% of total malignancies. There is a need for additional toolsets to assist the current clinical paradigm of care for patients with UTUC. As a non-invasive tool for the discovery of cancer-related biomarkers, the liquid biopsy has the potential to represent the complex process of tumorigenesis and metastasis. Herein, we show the efficacy of the liquid biopsy as a source of biomarkers for detecting UTUC. Using the third-generation high-definition single-cell assay (HDSCA3.0) workflow, we investigate liquid biopsy samples collected from patients with UTUC and normal donors (NDs) to provide critical information regarding the molecular and morphological characteristics of circulating rare events. We document several important findings from the liquid biopsy analysis of patients diagnosed with UTUC prior to surgery: (1) Large extracellular vesicles (LEVs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are detectable in the peripheral blood. (2) The rare-event profile is highly heterogeneous. (3) Clinical data elements correlate with liquid biopsy analytes. Overall, this study provides evidence for the efficacy of the liquid biopsy in understanding the biology of UTUC with the future intent of informing clinical decision making, ultimately improving patient outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: HDSCA; circulating tumor cell; large extracellular vesicle; liquid biopsy; peripheral blood; upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740671 PMCID: PMC9221424 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Clinical demographics for UTUC patients. CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index.
| Variable | Category | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | Median (range), year | 66.5 (43–88) |
| BMI | Median (range), kg/m2 | 26.05 (17.6–37.8) |
| Gender | Male | 17 (85%) |
| Female | 3 (15%) | |
| Smoker | Never | 8 (40%) |
| Former | 8 (40%) | |
| Current | 4 (20%) | |
| CCI | 0 | 10 (50%) |
| ≥1 | 10 (50%) | |
| Previous Bladder Cancer | Yes | 15 (75%) |
| No | 5 (25%) | |
| Type of Surgery | Nephroureterectomy +/− Bladder Cuff Excision | 17 (85%) |
| Distal Ureterectomy | 2 (10%) | |
| Laser Ablation | 1 (5%) | |
| Histology | Pure Urothelial | 17 (85%) |
| Urothelial with Variant Histology | 2 (10%) | |
| N/A * | 1 (5%) | |
| Pathology Grade | Low | 3 (15%) |
| High | 16 (80%) | |
| N/A * | 1 (5%) | |
| RNU pTstage | pT0 | 0 (0%) |
| pTa | 10 (50%) | |
| pTis | 0 (0%) | |
| pT1 | 1 (5%) | |
| pT2 | 0 (0%) | |
| pT3 | 7 (35%) | |
| pT4 | 1 (5%) | |
| N/A * | 1 (5%) | |
| Lymph Node Status | Node+ | 16 (80%) |
| Node− | 3 (15%) | |
| N/A * | 1 (5%) | |
| Neoadjuvant Chemo | Yes | 7 (35%) |
| No | 13 (65%) | |
| Adjuvant Chemo | Yes | 1 (5%) |
| No | 19 (95%) | |
| Recurrence (Bladder) | Yes | 3 (15%) |
| No | 17 (85%) |
* N/A values correspond to a patient that received Laser Ablation, and thus, there was no gross pathology specimen.
Figure 1Gallery of representative rare events detected in PB samples collected from patients diagnosed with UTUC (1326.20 ± 344.42 cells/frame) prior to surgery or NDs (1472.64 ± 343.62 cells/frame) with no known pathology by HDSCA3.0. (A–H) rare cells and (I) LEVs. (A) DAPI only; (B) Vim; (C) CD45/CD31; (D) Vim|CD45/CD31; (E) CK|Vim|CD45/CD31; (F) CK|CD45/CD31; (G) mes.CTC; (H) epi.CTC; (I) LEVs (top left: CK only; bottom left: CK|Vim|CD45/CD31; top right: CK|CD45/CD31; bottom right: CK|Vim.) Blue: DAPI, Red: CK, White: Vim, Green: CD45/CD31. Images taken at 100× magnification. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 2Rare-event detection in PB samples collected from UTUC patients prior to surgery using HDSCA3.0. (A) Enumeration and (B) frequency of each rare event by channel-type classification. (C) Graphical representation of the channel-type rare events/mL ordered by degree of statistical significance between UTUC and ND samples. Channel-type specifications that were not statistically significant across ND and UTUC samples are highlighted (p-value > 0.05). Diamond points indicate outliers.
Figure 3Morphometric analysis of individual events detected by HDSCA3.0 in PB samples collected from patients with UTUC prior to RNU. Depicted is a tSNE plot of rare cellular events depicting the underlying morphological heterogeneity. Each point represents a single cell and is color-coded according to (A) its channel-type classification and (B) a distinct cluster number, as determined by a clustering algorithm. Also visualized are the probability density distributions for select morphometric parameters across channel-type classifications of (C) cell area, (D) cell eccentricity, (E) median CK signal intensity, (F) median Vim signal intensity, and (G) median CD45/CD31 signal intensity.