Literature DB >> 3574047

A comparison of ankle taping methods.

M H Pope, P Renstrom, D Donnermeyer, S Morgenstern.   

Abstract

Four different types of ankle tapings were applied to a model of the human ankle joint. The model was constructed so that it contained a hinge to represent the ankle joint and had an external shape identical to a real ankle and foot. A mechanical testing machine was used to apply moments to the model at a controlled loading rate. From these tests, the deflection and torque to failure and the tangent stiffness were determined. Loadings of an ankle joint in vivo revealed that the angular deflection to initiate pain was approximately 8 degrees. Only the figure eight and full tapings could withstand 8 degrees of angular displacement on the ankle model prior to failure. Analysis of athletic trauma revealed that torques of 420 Nm could be applied to the ankle joint. Only the figure eight taping with three or more wraps has adequate strength to withstand this moment, and thus this taping is recommended. In practice, tapings failed by shearing away from the surface of the foot of shrinking rather than by rupture of the tape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3574047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  9 in total

1.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise.

Authors:  N Martin; R A Harter
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance.

Authors:  R C Metcalfe; G A Schlabach; M A Looney; E J Renehan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Role of ankle taping and bracing in the athlete.

Authors:  M J Callaghan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Soccer injuries. II: Aetiology and prevention.

Authors:  H Inklaar
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Ankle taping: support given by different materials.

Authors:  G Capasso; N Maffulli; V Testa
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 7.  Use of adhesive strapping in sport.

Authors:  D A McLean
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Effectiveness of functional ankle taping for judo athletes: a comparison between judo bandaging and taping.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; A Kigawa; T Xu
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 9.  Effectiveness of external ankle support. Bracing and taping in rugby union.

Authors:  P A Hume; D F Gerrard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.136

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.