Literature DB >> 3573768

The influence of aorta-aneurysm geometry upon stress in the aneurysm wall.

M M Stringfellow, P F Lawrence, R G Stringfellow.   

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA), a computer-based method for solving complex structural problems, was used to determine the wall stress distribution in three cases of model infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms representing common problems in determining risk of aneurysm rupture. The point of maximum circumferential wall stress in a spherical model aneurysm was located near the junction of the aneurysm and the nondilated aorta, while maximum longitudinal wall stress was located at the point of maximum diameter of the aneurysm. FEA showed that cylindrically shaped constant thickness model aneurysms had a higher maximum circumferential stress (sigma c = 11.9 X 10(5) dyn/cm2) and a comparable maximum longitudinal wall stress (sigma L = 6.6 X 10(5) dyn/cm2) when compared with spherical model aneurysms of the same diameter (sigma c = 8.1 X 10(5) dyn/cm2 and sigma L = 6.2 X 10(5) dyn/cm2). Analysis of the aorta to aneurysm diameter ratio (A:a gradient) indicated that aortic size is important in determining aneurysm wall stress and that the relationship between aortic size and wall stress is dependent upon aneurysm wall thickness. We conclude that the ability of the aneurysm wall to withstand stress in the longitudinal as well as the circumferential direction is an important factor determining aneurysm rupture. Finally, this investigation showed that FEA is a versatile tool for use in studying the mechanics of vascular structures, making it potentially more useful than size alone in estimating the clinical significance of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3573768     DOI: 10.1016/0022-4804(87)90178-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  12 in total

1.  Effects of arterial blood flow on walls of the abdominal aorta: distributions of wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index determined by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Koichi Sughimoto; Yoshiaki Shimamura; Chie Tezuka; Ken'ichi Tsubota; Hao Liu; Kenichiro Okumura; Yoshitada Masuda; Hideaki Haneishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Strain analysis of wall motion in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Ryosuke Taniguchi; Katsuyuki Hoshina; Akihiro Hosaka; Takuya Miyahara; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Kunihiro Shigematsu; Tetsuro Miyata; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Recent advances in the application of computational mechanics to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Juan C Del Alamo; Alison L Marsden; Juan C Lasheras
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.753

5.  Computer-aided 3-dimensional visualization of abdominal aortic aneurysms from CT images.

Authors:  M Nunokawa; H Shigematsu; T Hatakeyama; H Aramoto; T Muto; K Ohtsubo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment.

Authors:  Samarth S Raut; Santanu Chandra; Judy Shum; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models.

Authors:  J D Humphrey; C A Taylor
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

8.  The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Vande Geest; David E Schmidt; Michael S Sacks; David A Vorp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Improving the efficiency of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress computations.

Authors:  Jaime E Zelaya; Sevan Goenezen; Phong T Dargon; Amir-Farzin Azarbal; Sandra Rugonyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Manufacturing Abdominal Aorta Hydrogel Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms for Ultrasound Elastography Validation.

Authors:  Doran S Mix; Michael C Stoner; Steven W Day; Michael S Richards
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.