| Literature DB >> 35736471 |
Soumya K Kar1, Marinus F W Te Pas2, Leo Kruijt2, Jacques J M Vervoort3, Alfons J M Jansman1, Dirkjan Schokker4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to use fecal metabolite profiling to evaluate the effects of contrasting sanitary conditions and the associated subclinical health status of pigs. We analyzed fecal metabolite profiles by nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) from pigs aged 14 and 22 weeks. Pigs kept under low and high sanitary conditions differed in fecal metabolites related to the degradation of dietary starch, metabolism of the gut microbiome, and degradation of components of animal (host) origin. The metabolites that differed significantly (FDR < 0.1) were from metabolic processes involved in either maintaining nutrient digestive capacity, including purine metabolism, energy metabolism, bile acid breakdown and recycling, or immune system metabolism. The results show that the fecal metabolite profiles reflect the sanitary conditions under which the pigs are kept. The fecal metabolite profiles closely resembled the profiles of metabolites found in the colon of pigs. Fecal valerate and kynurenic acid could potentially be used as "non-invasive" biomarkers of immune or inflammatory status that could form the basis for monitoring subclinical health status in pigs.Entities:
Keywords: feces; health; immune; metabolomics; nuclear magnetic resonance; pig
Year: 2022 PMID: 35736471 PMCID: PMC9229933 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12060538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Metabolites showing different ratios in feces of pigs kept in high (HSC) or low sanitary conditions (LSC) at 14 and 22 weeks of age.
| Expected Origin | Bins | Metabolite | Week 14 | Week 22 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio HSC/LSC | FDR 1 | Ratio HSC/LSC | FDR | |||
| Diet | 7.93 | Xanthine | 1.53 | ns 2 | 1.41 | <0.1 |
| Microbiome | 1.52 | Butyrate | 0.76 | ns | 0.78 | <0.1 |
| Microbiome | 0.88 | Butyrate | 0.65 | ns | 0.75 | <0.1 |
| Microbiome | 2.18 | Butyrate and propionate | 0.81 | ns | 0.86 | <0.1 |
| Microbiome | Mean butyrate 3 | 0.74 | ns | 0.79 | <0.1 | |
| Microbiome | 1.06 | Propionate | 0.73 | <0.05 | 0.73 | <0.05 |
| Microbiome | Mean propionate 3 | 0.77 | ns | 0.79 | <0.1 | |
| Microbiome | 5.64, 5.63, 5.62 | UDP-glucose 4 | 1.15 | ns | 4.76 | <0.05 5 |
| Microbiome | 0.84 | Valerate (tentative annotation) 6 | 0.84 | ns | 1.37 | <0.1 |
| Microbiome | 5.94, 6.13, 6.12, 6.11, 7.89, 7.86 | Uridine derivates | 2.27 | <0.1 5 | 1.36 | ns |
| Endogenous (host) | 0.77, 0.76, 0.75, 0.74, 0.73 | Bile acids (tentative) | 0.64 | ns | 1.54 | <0.1 5 |
| Endogenous (host) | 6.65 (7.82, 7.68, 7.49) | Kynurenic acid | 0.80 | ns | 0.62 | <0.1 5 |
1 False discovery rate; 2 not significant; 3 mean value of the bins related to the metabolite; 4 UDP-glucose: uridine diphosphate-glucose; 5 mean FDR over bins; 6 tentative annotation: possible closest annotation of the metabolite.