| Literature DB >> 35735626 |
Kirill R Butov1,2, Natalia A Karetnikova3, Dmitry Y Pershin4, Dmitry Y Trofimov3, Mikhail A Panteleev1,2,5.
Abstract
Procoagulant activity in amniotic fluid (AF) is positively correlated with phosphatidylserine (PS) and tissue factor (TF)-expressing(+) extracellular vesicles (EVs). However, it is unknown if pathological fetal conditions may affect the composition, phenotype, and procoagulant potency of EVs in AF. We sought to evaluate EV-dependent procoagulant activity in AF from pregnant people with fetuses with or without diagnosed chromosomal mutations. AF samples were collected by transabdominal amniocentesis and assessed for common karyotype defects (total n = 11, 7 healthy and 4 abnormal karyotypes). The procoagulant activity of AF was tested using a fibrin generation assay with normal pooled plasma and plasmas deficient in factors XII, XI, IX, X, V, and VII. EV number and phenotype were determined by flow cytometry with anti-CD24 and anti-TF antibodies. We report that factor-VII-, X-, or V-deficient plasmas did not form fibrin clots in the presence of AF. Clotting time was significantly attenuated in AF samples with chromosomal mutations. In addition, CD24+, TF+, and CD24+ TF+ EV counts were significantly lower in this group. Finally, we found a significant correlation between EV counts and the clotting time induced by AF. In conclusion, we show that AF samples with chromosomal mutations had fewer fetal-derived CD24-bearing and TF-bearing EVs, which resulted in diminished procoagulant potency. This suggests that fetal-derived EVs are the predominant source of procoagulant activity in AF.Entities:
Keywords: Down syndrome; amniotic fluid; coagulation; extracellular vesicles; thrombosis; tissue factor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35735626 PMCID: PMC9221817 DOI: 10.3390/cimb44060185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Issues Mol Biol ISSN: 1467-3037 Impact factor: 2.976
Characteristics of patients enrolled for the study.
| Patient No. | Pregnancy Week | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18–19 | Normal Karyotype |
| 2 | 18–19 | Normal Karyotype |
| 3 | 17–18 | Normal Karyotype |
| 4 | 16–17 | Normal Karyotype |
| 5 | 18–19 | Normal Karyotype |
| 6 | 19–20 | Normal Karyotype |
| 7 | 18–19 | Normal Karyotype |
| 8 | 18–19 | Trisomy 21 |
| 9 | 18–19 | Trisomy 21, Trisomy X |
| 10 | 18–19 | Trisomy 21 |
| 11 | 18–19 | Trisomy 21 |
Figure 1Fibrin generation assay results initiated with AF samples. Clot formation was monitored by turbidity. (A) Onset time, (B) Curve slope and (C) Peak turbidity change for pooled plasma and plasmas deficient in factors VIII, IX, XI, V, VII, X clotted with 5% AF (n = 11) or pooled control recalcified plasma (AF 0%, n = 3) (D) Clotting onset time of samples from groups with healthy and abnormal karyotypes. (Healthy n = 7, AK n = 4). Symbols represent individual AF samples, lines show mean and SD. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.0005, ns = not significant; AK = abnormal karyotype.
Figure 2EV enumeration results measured by flow cytometry. (A) Differences for CD24+, TF+, and CD24+ TF + EV are reported as EV/uL. (B) Differences in ratio of CD24-positive TF+ EVs in individual samples (Healthy n = 7, AK n = 4; mean ± SD). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, ns = not significant; Mann–Whitney test. (C) Spearman correlations between individual AF samples. CD24+, TF+, and CD24+ TF+ EV counts against AF clotting onset time. AK = abnormal karyotype. Filled circles and triangles represent healthy and AK samples, respectively.