| Literature DB >> 35734762 |
Mengyu Li1,2, Jinglei Li1, Megat Al Imran Yasin2, Mohd Nizam Osman2, Norliana Binti Hashim2, Lay Hoon Ang2, Yitian Xue3.
Abstract
The popularity of mobile gaming has become a common sight in rural areas, and the problem of left-behind children's mobile gaming has become the biggest challenge faced by rural education, and has become a hot topic in the education sector and society. The stage of left-behind children is the golden period of learning and growth. However, this stage is also the period when they have the greatest fluctuations in their ideology due to various factors such as guardians and youths. With the development of big data, it has been applied to various aspects of people's life. This article is mainly based on qualitative research, with the interview and observation as the main methods, supplemented by a questionnaire survey method. In the empirical analysis part, this article has a certain degree of expansion in data selection and research methods. Compared with previous studies, we increased the scale of the research data, making the research results more meaningful. In the research method, the ordinary least squares method (OLS), the propensity score matching method (PSM) and the two-stage least square method (2SLS) are used, and multiple control variables are selected. The factor analysis of the original scores of the historical knowledge test and the original scores of the two-dimensional cultural value evaluation are carried out to obtain the factor scores of cognitive ability. The emotion of the child is expressed by the depression score, and factor analysis is also performed on the depression score. Cognitive abilities refer to reasoning or thinking, processing speeds, and one's ability to solve problems in novel situations, independent of acquired knowledge. OLS regression results show that left-behind children are inferior to non-left-behind ones in cognitive ability. Moreover, left-behind children are more likely to be emotionally depressed. And whether the children are accompanied by migrant or rural parents, there is no significant difference in their cognitive ability and emotions. Because there are unobservable factors that affect whether children are left-behind and children's cognitive abilities and emotions, the sample may have a self-selection bias. This research focuses on the phenomenon of left-behind children's mobile gaming, revealing the compromised cognitive abilities of these marginalized children groups. Our study might put a wake-up for authorities on the education in rural areas.Entities:
Keywords: big data; cognitive impact; left-behind children; rural economy; social mobile games
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734762 PMCID: PMC9208276 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.915801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the cognitive measurement model of left-behind children.
Cognitive level distribution table of left-behind children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.261 | 0.433 | 0.058 | 0.228 |
| 2 | 0.441 | 0.667 | 0.095 | 0.366 |
| 3 | 0.221 | 0.352 | 0.048 | 0.178 |
| 4 | 0.132 | 0.423 | 0.065 | 0.281 |
Analysis of operating elements of social mobile games.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1.793 | 2,355 | 0.343 |
| B | 2.384 | 2,411 | 0.289 |
| C | 3.012 | 2,561 | 0.336 |
| D | 2.774 | 2,713 | 0.257 |
| E | 3.061 | 2,615 | 0.281 |
Figure 2The distribution of the standardized deviation curve of the cognitive impact model.
Figure 3Histogram of cognitive ability scores of left-behind children in rural areas.
Standardized deviation distribution of control variables before and after model matching.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age | 9.5 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| Gender | 4.8 | 7.2 | 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Educational investment | 12.2 | 11.2 | 2.9 | 3.6 |
| Net income per capita | 5.6 | 7.4 | 11.6 | 9.2 |
Figure 4Cognitive abilities distribution of left-behind children among the explained variables.
Figure 5Line chart of cognitive ability factor scores and depression factor scores for different data points. The *symbol indicates the child who takes the cognitive ability test. Y-axis indicates score. There are 51 children in the test.
Figure 6A three-dimensional histogram of the average cognitive ability scores and depression factor scores of left-behind children in different age groups.
Figure 7Significance level distribution of cognitive ability test of left-behind children.