| Literature DB >> 35734574 |
Hong Chen1,2, Tao Wang1, Fei Deng1, Fan Yang1, Xiaoyuan Zhong1, Qiuping Li1, Wanjun Ren1.
Abstract
GuichaoII, a rice variety with high amylose content widely used to make rice noodles, exhibits high hardness (631.07-729.43), gel consistency (8.47-9.47 mm), and hold viscosity/peak viscosity (HPV/PKV) (0.85-0.88); however, it has a low protein content (5.74-6.96%) and swelling factor (5.49-9.77). Herein, GuichaoII was subjected to low-light stress (53% reduction) during the grain filling stage. The amylose content and crystallinity of GuichaoII and the control variety Shuhui 498 decreased while the protein content, short-chain branch ratio, and degree of branching increased, which affected the ability of the rice flour to absorb water and expand during the gelatinization process. The PKV, HPV, breakdown viscosity, and final viscosity were significantly reduced, while the hardness was significantly increased, and the gel consistency and the gelatinization quality of the rice were reduced, severely limiting the processing and production of rice noodles.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical composition; Rice noodle; Shading; Starch
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734574 PMCID: PMC9207303 DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Chem X ISSN: 2590-1575
RVA and thermal properties of GuichaoII and Shuhui498.
| Treatment | PKV (RUV) | HPV (RUV) | BDV (RUV) | CPV (RUV) | SBV (RUV) | HPV/PKV | PaT (°C) | To (°C) | Tp (°C) | Tc (°C) | ΔH (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-CK | 243.22 ± 2.36c | 214.86 ± 1.53a | 28.36 ± 3.86c | 316.39 ± 6.61a | 73.17 ± 3.25a | 0.88 ± 0.01a | 86.72 ± 1.08a | 60.19 ± 0.12c | 65.6 ± 0.01b | 73.39 ± 0.22b | 10.99 ± 0.09ab |
| G-Shading | 225.39 ± 6.72d | 198.08 ± 4.17b | 27.31 ± 1.19d | 301.03 ± 9.22b | 75.64 ± 3.24a | 0.85 ± 0.02a | 87.57 ± 1.12a | 59.74 ± 0.38c | 65.73 ± 0.09b | 72.93 ± 0.20b | 10.29 ± 0.96b |
| Mean | 241.14 ± 1.59B | 210.00 ± 3.49A | 27.84 ± 2.48B | 319.07 ± 2.93A | 77.93 ± 3.42A | 0.87 ± 0.01A | 86.74 ± 0.27A | 59.96 ± 0.20B | 65.67 ± 0.05B | 73.15 ± 0.17B | 10.64 ± 0.46A |
| S-CK | 281.64 ± 1.84a | 148.50 ± 5.02c | 133.14 ± 7.15a | 228.14 ± 11.09c | −53.50 ± 4.12b | 0.53 ± 0.02b | 74.43 ± 0.81b | 62.80 ± 0.03b | 68.47 ± 0.05a | 74.53 ± 0.06a | 12.12 ± 0.01a |
| S-Shading | 275.14 ± 2.98b | 136.55 ± 3.76d | 125.92 ± 3.21b | 221.08 ± 4.21c | −42.42 ± 3.12b | 0.50 ± 0.05b | 74.45 ± 0.01b | 63.59 ± 0.04a | 68.68 ± 0.10a | 74.33 ± 0.01a | 11.28 ± 0.10ab |
| Mean | 273.85 ± 4.14A | 142.53 ± 4.10B | 131.32 ± 3.54A | 224.61 ± 4.21B | −49.24 ± 4.80B | 0.52 ± 0.01B | 76.29 ± 2.02B | 63.19 ± 0.18A | 68.57 ± 0.07A | 74.42 ± 0.05A | 11.70 ± 0.19A |
PKV: peak viscosity; HPV: hold viscosity; BDV: breakdown viscosity; CPV: final viscosity; SBV: setback; PaT: pasting temperature. To, Tp, and Tc represent the onset, peak, and conclusion temperatures, respectively; ΔH: the gelatinization enthalpies,; G-CK: GuichaoII under normal light; G-Shading: GuichaoII under shading; S-CK: Shuhui498 under normal light; S-Shading: Shuhui498 under shading. Values with different letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Chemical composition, texture profile analysis (TPA), gel consistency and swelling factor of GuichaoII and Shuhui498.
| Treatment | Amylose content (%) | Amylopectin content (%) | Amylose/Amylopectin | Protein content (%) | Swelling factor (g/g) | Hardness | Springiness | chewiness | adhesiveness | cohesiveness | restorative | Gel consistency (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-CK | 26.32 ± 3.99a | 56.57 ± 8.10b | 0.48 ± 0.07a | 5.74 ± 0.20d | 9.77 ± 0.44b | 729.43 ± 112.43a | 0.88 ± 0.03a | 400.72 ± 101.52a | 454.48 ± 99.53a | 0.71 ± 0.09ab | 0.66 ± 0.03a | 9.47 ± 0.80a |
| G-Shading | 20.78 ± 0.41b | 55.49 ± 2.73b | 0.38 ± 0.01b | 6.96 ± 0.03c | 5.49 ± 0.08c | 631.07 ± 65.20a | 0.89 ± 0.02a | 501.83 ± 88.55a | 567.67 ± 103.39a | 0.78 ± 0.02a | 0.68 ± 0.04a | 8.47 ± 0.32ab |
| Mean | 23.55 ± 1.61A | 56.03 ± 2.22B | 0.43 ± 0.04A | 6.32 ± 0.28B | 7.63 ± 0.97B | 680.25 ± 40.12A | 0.88 ± 0.01A | 451.27 ± 41.49A | 511.08 ± 44.87B | 0.75 ± 0.03A | 0.67 ± 0.01A | 8.97 ± 0.32A |
| S-CK | 15.96 ± 1.12c | 71.43 ± 7.16a | 0.23 ± 0.02c | 8.79 ± 0.76b | 13.15 ± 3.84ab | 189.67 ± 20.02b | 0.70 ± 0.08b | 80.55 ± 21.02b | 113.40 ± 21.30b | 0.59 ± 0.05c | 0.49 ± 0.02b | 7.27 ± 1.07b |
| S-Shading | 14.20 ± 0.70d | 75.44 ± 8.06a | 0.19 ± 0.01d | 9.28 ± 1.22a | 14.53 ± 1.41a | 178.13 ± 40.46b | 0.66 ± 0.06b | 72.44 ± 17.08b | 110.86 ± 26.69b | 0.62 ± 0.01bc | 0.50 ± 0.05b | 7.23 ± 0.31b |
| Mean | 15.08 ± 0.52B | 73.43 ± 2.92A | 0.21 ± 0.01B | 9.04 ± 0.39A | 13.84 ± 1.10A | 183.90 ± 11.82 | 0.68 ± 0.03B | 76.50 ± 7.22B | 112.13 ± 8.83A | 0.61 ± 0.01B | 0.50 ± 0.01B | 7.25 ± 0.29B |
Values with different letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1Scanning electron microscopy images of rice starch granules from (a and b) GuichaoII and (c and d) Shuhui498. (a and c): under normal light levels, (b and d): under shading. The red arrows indicate elliptic or near-elliptic starch granules, and the yellow arrows indicate eroded pores on the surface of the starch granules. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Effect of low light stress on the diameter of rice starch granules.
| Treatment | Number-weighted mean diameter (μm) | Volume-weighted mean diameter (μm) | Surface-area weighted mean diameter (μm) | Distribution of volume-weighted mean diameter (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <5 μm | 5–15 μm | >15 μm | ||||
| G-CK | 4.34 ± 0.01a | 7.11 ± 0.02a | 6.00 ± 0.01a | 24.66 ± 0.12c | 73.96 ± 0.14a | 1.38 ± 0.01b |
| G-Shading | 4.01 ± 0.00b | 7.14 ± 0.02a | 5.82 ± 0.01b | 27.71 ± 0.11b | 69.89 ± 0.20b | 2.40 ± 0.00a |
| Mean | 4.18 ± 0.07A | 7.81 ± 0.25A | 5.92 ± 0.04A | 26.19 ± 0.68A | 71.92 ± 0.91A | 1.89 ± 0.23A |
| S-CK | 4.41 ± 0.01a | 6.77 ± 0.01b | 5.81 ± 0.01b | 26.83 ± 0.11b | 72.54 ± 0.11a | 0.62 ± 0.00c |
| S-Shading | 4.15 ± 0.01b | 7.03 ± 0.01a | 5.82 ± 0.01b | 29.32 ± 0.21a | 67.82 ± 0.13b | 2.86 ± 0.01a |
| Mean | 4.28 ± 0.06A | 7.79 ± 0.39A | 5.82 ± 0.01A | 28.08 ± 0.56A | 70.18 ± 1.06A | 1.74 ± 0.50A |
G-CK: GuichaoII under normal light; G-Shading: GuichaoII under shading; S-CK: Shuhui498 under normal light; S-Shading: Shuhui498 under shading. Values with different letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Amylopectin length distribution, branching degree and crystallinity of GuichaoII and Shuhui498.
| Treatment | Crystallinity degree (%) | Branching degree (%) | Ratio of 1045/1022 cm−1 | Ratio of 1022/995 cm−1 | (DP 6–12) | (DP 13–24) | (DP 25–36) | (DP > 36) | DP 6–12 of amylopectin content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-CK | 35.11 ± 1.34ab | 3.29 ± 0.33d | 0.75 ± 0.01a | 1.40 ± 0.01a | 28.66 ± 0.58a | 47.39 ± 0.27a | 11.73 ± 0.17b | 12.22 ± 0.68a | 0.16 ± 0.01b |
| G-Shading | 32.54 ± 1.17b | 6.66 ± 0.36b | 0.73 ± 0.01a | 1.42 ± 0.00a | 27.98 ± 0.23b | 47.27 ± 0.25a | 12.04 ± 0.05ab | 12.71 ± 0.42a | 0.16 ± 0.01b |
| Mean | 33.82 ± 0.98B | 4.97 ± 0.79A | 0.74 ± 0.03A | 1.41 ± 0.03A | 28.32 ± 0.32A | 47.33 ± 0.16A | 11.89 ± 0.11A | 12.47 ± 0.37A | 0.16 ± 0.01b |
| S-CK | 38.21 ± 0.95a | 5.06 ± 0.70c | 0.76 ± 0.01a | 1.38 ± 0.01a | 28.53 ± 0.58a | 47.60 ± 0.25a | 11.68 ± 0.01b | 13.06 ± 0.30a | 0.20 ± 0.00a |
| S-Shading | 37.44 ± 0.93a | 8.85 ± 0.45a | 0.75 ± 0.00a | 1.37 ± 0.00a | 27.76 ± 0.49b | 47.02 ± 0.40a | 12.16 ± 0.18a | 12.55 ± 0.72a | 0.21 ± 0.01a |
| Mean | 37.82 ± 0.62A | 6.95 ± 0.92A | 0.74 ± 0.03A | 1.38 ± 0.03A | 28.15 ± 0.28A | 47.31 ± 0.25A | 11.92 ± 0.13A | 12.62 ± 0.40A | 0.21 ± 0.01a |
G-CK: GuichaoII control (under normal light); G-Shading: GuichaoII under shading; S-CK: Shuhui498 control; S-Shading: Shuhui498 under shading. Values with different letters within a column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Relationship between the pasting, structural, and physicochemical properties. PKV: peak viscosity; HPV: hold viscosity; BDV: breakdown viscosity; CPV: final viscosity; SBV: setback; PaT: pasting temperature.