| Literature DB >> 35734482 |
Hasim Kural1, Ercan Yilmaz1, Rauf Melekoglu1, Aysenur Akatli1, Leyla Karaca1.
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the depth of myometrial invasion preoperatively with transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and frozen section examination techniques in patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer. Our study included 65 patients. Transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in study patients in the preoperative period. Frozen section examination was performed in all hysterectomy samples obtained from all study patients. Data were analyzed with SPSS Statistics 22.0 program. The sensitivity of transvaginal ultrasound in determining the depth of myometrial invasion was 88.64%, specificity 90.48%, positive predictive value 95.12%, and negative predictive value 79.17%. For magnetic resonance imaging, the sensitivity was 63.64%, specificity 95.24%, positive predictive value 96.55%, and negative predictive value 55.56%. In addition to the frozen section examination, which is the gold standard in determining the myometrial invasion depth, transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have become commonly used methods for this purpose in recent years. Ultrasound examination performed by an experienced specialist is superior to magnetic resonance imaging as it is fast, inexpensive, and associated with higher sensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: Endometrial cancer; Frozen section; MRI; Myometrial invasion; TVUS
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35734482 PMCID: PMC9196230 DOI: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.04.15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Clin Croat ISSN: 0353-9466 Impact factor: 0.932
Fig. 1Evaluation of myometrial invasion by transvaginal ultrasound: (a) myometrial invasion <1/2; (b) myometrial invasion >1/2; (c) schematic presentation of the evaluation of myometrial invasion: (A) maximum distance of tumor depth; (B) total myometrial thickness; (A/B) invasion rate; *schematic figure is taken from reference number 15; red arrows indicate the depth of myometrial invasion.
Fig. 2Myometrial invasion extending to serosa in the T2-weighted and T1 post-contrast sagittal sections of magnetic resonance image; red arrows indicate the depth of myometrial invasion.
Demographic, surgical, and histopathologic features of study patients
| Mean ± SD, n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Age (yrs) | 60.75±12.28 |
| Complaint: | 14 (22%) |
| Surgical procedure: | 34 (52%) |
| Number of lymph nodes: | 25.52±10.68 |
| Stage: | 42(64.6%) |
| Tumor size (mm) | 43.2±21.5 |
| Grade: | 29 (44%) |
| LVI: | 26 (40%) |
| Radiotherapy: | 13 (20%) |
| Chemotherapy: | 15 (23%) |
SD = standard deviation; n = number of patients; PMH = postmenopausal hemorrhage; TAH + BSO = total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; PLND = pelvic lymph node dissection; PPLND = para-aortic lymph node dissection; LVI = lymphovascular area invasion
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV (in percentages) of TVUS, MRI, and frozen section examination in determining myometrial invasion
| TVUS (%) | MRI (%) | Frozen section examination (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 88.64 | 63.64 | 100 |
| Specificity | 90.48 | 95.24 | 85.71 |
| PPV | 95.12 | 96.55 | 93.62 |
| NPV | 79.17 | 55.56 | 100 |
TVUS = transvaginal ultrasound; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value
Fig. 3Sensitivity and specificity of transvaginal ultrasound, MRI, and frozen section examination in determining the depth of myometrial invasion. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging