Introduction: The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) has been used to assess individual readiness for health behavior change. We describe our use of the TTM to assess organizational readiness of African-American churches to participate in the Church Challenge (CC) in Flint, Michigan; the processes of change that moved churches toward readiness for change; and lessons learned. Methods: The CC was a faith-based, multilevel intervention to reduce chronic disease risk. A community-based participatory approach was used to engage and recruit churches. We used the TTM to capture church readiness for change and track church progress through the five stages. Results: We engaged with 70 churches: 35 remained in Stage 1 (precontemplation), 10 remained in Stage 2 (contemplation), 3 remained in Stage 3 (preparation), 5 made it to Stage 4 (action), and 17 finished within Stage 5 (maintenance). Churches engaged in several processes of change as they moved through the various stages of change. Lessons Learned: Utilizing processes of change, establishing rapport, and having previous participants share success stories helped move churches from stage-to-stage. However, certain barriers prevented progression, such as burnout/trauma from the Flint Water Crisis and scheduling conflicts. Discussion: Faith-based organizational readiness greatly impacted participation in the CC. Researchers should utilize established social capital, build rapport, and remain flexible when working with African-American churches. Conclusion: Although traditionally used at the individual level, the TTM works well at the organizational level to assess and monitor church readiness to participate in community-engaged research and health programming to improve health in an African-American faith community.
Introduction: The Transtheoretical Model (TTM) has been used to assess individual readiness for health behavior change. We describe our use of the TTM to assess organizational readiness of African-American churches to participate in the Church Challenge (CC) in Flint, Michigan; the processes of change that moved churches toward readiness for change; and lessons learned. Methods: The CC was a faith-based, multilevel intervention to reduce chronic disease risk. A community-based participatory approach was used to engage and recruit churches. We used the TTM to capture church readiness for change and track church progress through the five stages. Results: We engaged with 70 churches: 35 remained in Stage 1 (precontemplation), 10 remained in Stage 2 (contemplation), 3 remained in Stage 3 (preparation), 5 made it to Stage 4 (action), and 17 finished within Stage 5 (maintenance). Churches engaged in several processes of change as they moved through the various stages of change. Lessons Learned: Utilizing processes of change, establishing rapport, and having previous participants share success stories helped move churches from stage-to-stage. However, certain barriers prevented progression, such as burnout/trauma from the Flint Water Crisis and scheduling conflicts. Discussion: Faith-based organizational readiness greatly impacted participation in the CC. Researchers should utilize established social capital, build rapport, and remain flexible when working with African-American churches. Conclusion: Although traditionally used at the individual level, the TTM works well at the organizational level to assess and monitor church readiness to participate in community-engaged research and health programming to improve health in an African-American faith community.
Entities:
Keywords:
Transtheoretical Model; community engagement; health disparities; hypertension; organizational readiness
Authors: W Demark-Wahnefried; J W McClelland; B Jackson; M K Campbell; A Cowan; K Hoben; B K Rimer Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2000 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sara Wilcox; Marilyn Laken; Allen W Parrott; Margaret Condrasky; Ruth Saunders; Cheryl L Addy; Rebecca Evans; Meghan Baruth; May Samuel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson; Ken Resnicow; Natasha Blakeney; Amy Paxton; Monica Baskin Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2007 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Lovoria B Williams; Richard W Sattin; James Dias; Jane T Garvin; Lucy Marion; Thomas Joshua; Andrea Kriska; M Kaye Kramer; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Arin Freeman; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; Nancy Houston Miller; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Lawrence R Krakoff; Nancy T Artinian; David Goff Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jamie M Zoellner; Carol C Connell; Michael B Madson; Bo Wang; Vickie Blakely Reed; Elaine Fontenot Molaison; Kathleen Yadrick Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2011-06-10 Impact factor: 6.457