| Literature DB >> 35734400 |
Yan Lin1, Xiaoli Liao1, Yumei Zhang1, Guobin Wu2, Jiazhou Ye2, Shanshan Luo3, Xinxin He3, Min Luo1, Mingzhi Xie1, Jinyan Zhang1, Qian Li1, Yu Huang1, Sina Liao1, Yongqiang Li1, Rong Liang1.
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy is the basic treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, colorectal cancer cells often develop resistance to chemotherapy drugs, leading to recurrence and poor prognosis. More and more studies have shown that the Homologous recombination (HR) pathway plays an important role in chemotherapy treatment for tumors. However, the relationship between HR pathway, chemotherapy sensitivity, and the prognosis of CRC patients is still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; homologous recombination; prognosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734400 PMCID: PMC9207269 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.920939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
FIGURE 1Overall design of the study.
FIGURE 2The prognosis value of the HR-MUT group (A). Logistic regression model of the HR-MUT group and clinical characteristics in the Local-CRC cohort (B). A comparison between the HR mutation statuses of the metastasis-yes group and metastasis-no group (C). A comparison between the tumor metastasis statuses of the HR-MUT and HR-WT groups (D). The univariable and multivariable cox regression model of the HR-MUT group and clinical characteristics in the Mondaca-CRC cohort (E). KM curve showed the HR-MUT CRC patients displayed a significant improvement in OS time compared with the HR-WT CRC patients in the Mondaca-CRC cohort (*p < 0.05).
FIGURE 3A comparison between the IC50 values of common chemotherapy drugs used on HR-MUT and the HR-WT CRC patients (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 4The mutation profiles of the HR-MUT and HR-WT CRC patients. The mutational landscape of the top mutated gene mutations in the Local-CRC cohort (A) and Mondaca-CRC cohort (B). A comparison of the TMB levels of the HR-MUT group and HR-WT group in the Local-CRC cohort (C) and Mondaca-CRC cohort (D). A comparison between the MSI scores (E) and MSI statuses (F) the HR-MUT and HR-WT groups in the Mondaca-CRC cohort (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001).
FIGURE 5The GSEA results. A comparison of the enrichment scores of immune-related (A), tumor metabolism (B) and tumor metastasis/growth (C) found in the HR-MUT and HR-WT groups based on the GSEA algorithm.
FIGURE 6The ssGSEA results. A comparison between the ssGSEA scores in the category of immune-related (A), DNA-related (B), metabolism-related (C) and tumor metastasis/growth related (D) of the HR-MUT and HR-WT based on the ssGSEA algorithm (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001).