| Literature DB >> 35734225 |
Abstract
Colorectal cancer patients face physical, psychological, and social difficulties. Psychosocial therapies appear to be successful in improving cancer patients' psychological and social results. Preoperative and postoperative psychological therapies for colorectal surgery patients have not been extensively studied. During their treatment, up to 35% of cancer patients experience clinically severe psychological discomfort. As a consequence, a greater knowledge of health-related quality of life and its causes can assist oncology nurses in developing effective treatments to improve the health-related quality of life. The palliative care model and the nursing intervention model are used in this study to assess the effectiveness of an individually customized nursing intervention for lowering chemotherapy-related symptom distress in adult patients with colorectal cancer. Initially, the dataset is collected and split into the control group and the experimental group. The patient conditions are evaluated using the novel accelerated gradient boosting regression tree (AGBRT) estimation model. For improving the evaluation process, we have proposed the enriched gravitational search optimization algorithm (EGSOA). The system's success is evaluated in terms of the patients' psychological well-being and quality of life.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734225 PMCID: PMC9208981 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7777446
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oncol ISSN: 1687-8450 Impact factor: 4.501
Figure 1Proposed system's schematic flow.
Data.
| Factors | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ≤61 | 14 (44.67) | 15 (50.10) | 0.289 | 0.655 |
| ≥61 | 16 (57.78) | 15 (49.50) | |||
| Gender | Male | 16 (53.80) | 17 (57.68) | 0.087 | 0.799 |
| Female | 14 (46.79) | 13 (44.59) | |||
| Pathogenic region | Colon cancer | 15 (50.50) | 13 (44.67) | 0.285 | 0.655 |
| Rectal cancer | 15 (49.50) | 17 (57.59) | |||
| Pathological pattern | Squamous carcinoma | 17 (56.87) | 16 (53.68) | 0.068 | 0.815 |
| Glandular cancer | 13 (43.78) | 14 (46.90) | |||
| BMI (kg/m2) | ≤23 | 18 (60.80) | 16 (53.60) | 0.288 | 0.648 |
| ≥23 | 12 (40.68) | 14 (47.78) | |||
| Educational level | Below high school | 20 (68.78) | 21 (70.39) | 0.785 | 0.7891 |
| High school and above | 10 (33.69) | 9 (30.48) | |||
| Smoking history | Present | 14 (47.58) | 13 (43.75) | 0.068 | 0.815 |
| Absent | 16 (54.76) | 17 (56.48) | |||
Figure 2Colorectal cancer analysis using the accelerated gradient boosting regression tree technique.
Figure 3Comparative analysis of quality of life vs time.
Comparative analysis of quality of life.
| Quality of life | Group |
| Learn |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning | Control | 30 | 64.56 | 0.020 |
| Experimental | 30 | 36.49 | ||
|
| ||||
| Physical role | Control | 30 | 71.58 | 0.020 |
| Experimental | 30 | 30.25 | ||
|
| ||||
| Body pain | Control | 30 | 47.32 | 0.140 |
| Experimental | 30 | 54.98 | ||
|
| ||||
| General health | Control | 30 | 63.91 | 0.020 |
| Experimental | 30 | 39.41 | ||
|
| ||||
| Vitality | Control | 30 | 61.21 | 0.020 |
| Experimental | 30 | 41.81 | ||
|
| ||||
| Social functioning | Control | 30 | 56.15 | 0.490 |
| Experimental | 30 | 45.76 | ||
|
| ||||
| Emotional role | Control | 30 | 68.52 | 0.020 |
| Experimental | 30 | 33.98 | ||
|
| ||||
| Mental health | Control | 30 | 59.11 | 0.040 |
| Experimental | 30 | 43.12 | ||
Figure 4Comparative analysis of psychological distress vs time.
Comparative analysis of psychological conditions.
| Psychological states | Experimental group ( | Control group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| The total score of the beck depression inventory (mean ± SD) | 15.7 ± 9.0 | 13.6 ± 10.1 | 0.90 |
| The total score of the beck anxiety inventory (mean ± SD) | 24.2 ± 5.2 | 15.1 ± 7.5 | 0.02 |
| Health concerning sexual performance | 9.0 (16%) | 13.0 (24%) | |
| Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (mean ± SD) | 55.9 ± 12.4 | 46.3 ± 11.90 |
Figure 5Comparative analysis of negative emotion scores of SAS (Sedation-Agitation Scale).
Figure 6Comparative analysis of negative emotion scores of SDS (Sheehan Disability Scale).