| Literature DB >> 35734201 |
Abstract
Objective: Bevacizumab is usually considered a first-line anti-tumor therapy, which inhibits tumor growth by downregulating the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) that further silences the activity of the kinase insert region receptor (KDR) gene. In the current study, we investigated the treatment response of bevacizumab in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients bearing 889 C>T mutation in the KDR gene.Entities:
Keywords: bevacizumab; clinical outcomes; colorectal cancer; kinase insert domain receptor; polymorphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734201 PMCID: PMC9208669 DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S362366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gen Med ISSN: 1178-7074
Comparison of Baseline Characteristics of 135 Patients with CRC Patients According to 889 C>T Genotype Status
| Characteristics | Total (N = 135, %) | 889 C>T Genotypes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC (N = 97) | CT/TT (N = 38) | |||
| Age | ||||
| Median (range) | 58 (31–75) | 57 (31–75) | 58 (33–75) | 0.515 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 86 (63.70) | 60 (61.86) | 26 (68.42) | 0.475 |
| Female | 49 (36.30) | 37 (38.14) | 12 (31.58) | |
| Tumor types | ||||
| Colon cancer | 87 (64.44) | 62 (63.92) | 25 (65.79) | 0.866 |
| Rectal cancer | 48 (35.56) | 35 (36.08) | 13 (34.21) | |
| Tumor differentiation | ||||
| Well | 25 (18.64) | 18 (18.56) | 7 (18.42) | 0.899 |
| Moderate | 93 (68.64) | 68 (70.10) | 25 (65.79) | |
| Poor | 11 (8.47) | 8 (8.25) | 4 (10.53) | |
| Not available | 6 (4.25) | 3 (3.09) | 2 (5.26) | |
| Tumor location | ||||
| Right-sided colon cancer | 47 (34.81) | 32 (32.99) | 15 (39.47) | 0.477 |
| Left-sided CRC | 88 (65.19) | 65 (67.01) | 23 (60.53) | |
| Number of metastatic lesions | ||||
| >3 | 87 (64.44) | 61 (62.88) | 26 (68.42) | 0.546 |
| ≤3 | 48 (35.56) | 36 (37.12) | 12 (31.58) | |
| Metastatic site | ||||
| Liver | ||||
| Yes | 95 (70.37) | 71 (73.20) | 24 (63.16) | 0.251 |
| No | 40 (29.63) | 26 (26.80) | 14 (36.84) | |
| Peritoneal | ||||
| Yes | 12 (8.88) | 7 (7.22) | 5 (13.16) | 0.275 |
| No | 123 (91.12) | 90 (92.78) | 33 (86.84) | |
| RAS mutation status | ||||
| Positive | 50 (37.04) | 38 (39.18) | 12 (31.58) | 0.689 |
| Negative | 70 (51.85) | 49 (50.51) | 21 (55.26) | |
| Unknown | 15 (11.11) | 10 (10.31) | 5 (13.16) | |
| BRAF mutation status | ||||
| Positive | 20 (14.82) | 15 (15.46) | 5 (13.16) | 0.650 |
| Negative | 96 (71.11) | 70 (72.17) | 26 (68.42) | |
| Unknown | 19 (14.07) | 12 (12.37) | 7 (18.42) | |
| ECOG score | ||||
| 0 | 94 (69.63) | 67 (69.07) | 27 (71.05) | 0.732 |
| 1–2 | 41 (30.37) | 30 (30.93) | 11 (28.95) | |
| Combined chemotherapy regimen | ||||
| Xelox | 96 (71.11) | 69 (71.13) | 27 (71.05) | 0.920 |
| Folfox | 39 (28.89) | 28 (28.87) | 11 (28.95) | |
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; CC, wild-type homozygous; CT, heterozygous; TT, mutant-type homozygous.
Figure 1The percentage of effectiveness of the 135 patients.
Figure 2Comparison of progression free survival of 135 CRC patients according to KDR889 C>T status.
Multivariable Cox Regression Analysis of Progression Free Survival According to Baseline Characteristics and Polymorphism
| Characteristics | Regression Coefficient (β) | WALD | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||||
| <58 | 0.512 | 7.86 | 1 (references) | 1 | 0.015 |
| ≥58 | 1.91 (1.13–2.57) | ||||
| ECOG score | |||||
| 0 | 0.645 | 21.79 | 1 (reference) | 1 | <0.001 |
| 1–2 | 2.27 (1.02–2.95) | ||||
| KDR 889 C>T | |||||
| CC genotype | 0.323 | 5.54 | 1 (reference) | 1 | 0.023 |
| CT/TT genotype | 1.88 (1.16–2.57) | ||||
| RAS mutation status | |||||
| Negative | 0.540 | 8.38 | 1 (reference) | 1 | 0.004 |
| Positive | 2.00 (1.05–3.52) | ||||
| Liver metastatic site | |||||
| No | 0.683 | 5.75 | 1 (reference) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 4.27 (1.04–8.11) | ||||
| Tumor location | |||||
| Left-sided CRC | 0.677 | 5.28 | 1 (reference) | 1 | 0.022 |
| Right-sided colon cancer | |||||
| 2.07 (1.15–3.51) |
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratios; CI, confidence interval; df, degree of freedom.
Figure 3Comparison of overall survival of 135 CRC patients with different genotypes according to KDR 889 C>T status.
Figure 4Comparison of relative KDR mRNA expression according to KDR 889 C>T status.