Literature DB >> 35734183

CD317-Positive Immune Stromal Cells in Human "Mesenchymal Stem Cell" Populations.

Alasdair G Kay1, James M Fox1, James P Hewitson1, Andrew P Stone1, Sophie Robertson1, Sally James1, Xiao-Nong Wang2, Elizabeth Kapasa3, Xuebin B Yang3, Paul G Genever1.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs, frequently referred to as "mesenchymal stem cells") clouds biological understanding and hampers their clinical development. In MSC cultures most commonly used in research and therapy, we have identified an MSC subtype characterized by CD317 expression (CD317pos (29.77 ± 3.00% of the total MSC population), comprising CD317dim (28.10 ± 4.60%) and CD317bright (1.67 ± 0.58%) MSCs) and a constitutive interferon signature linked to human disease. We demonstrate that CD317pos MSCs induced cutaneous tissue damage when applied a skin explant model of inflammation, whereas CD317neg MSCs had no effect. Only CD317neg MSCs were able to suppress proliferative cycles of activated human T cells in vitro, whilst CD317pos MSCs increased polarization towards pro-inflammatory Th1 cells and CD317neg cell lines did not. Using an in vivo peritonitis model, we found that CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs suppressed leukocyte recruitment but only CD317neg MSCs suppressed macrophage numbers. Using MSC-loaded scaffolds implanted subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice we were able to observe tissue generation and blood vessel formation with CD317neg MSC lines, but not CD317pos MSC lines. Our evidence is consistent with the identification of an immune stromal cell, which is likely to contribute to specific physiological and pathological functions and influence clinical outcome of therapeutic MSCs.
Copyright © 2022 Kay, Fox, Hewitson, Stone, Robertson, James, Wang, Kapasa, Yang and Genever.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BST2; CD317; MSC subtypes; heterogeneity; immunomodulation; mesenchymal stromal cells; tetherin

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35734183      PMCID: PMC9207511          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   8.786


1 Introduction

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) exist in bone marrow at a frequency of approximately 0.001-0.01% (1) and are typically self-renewing for 10-50 population doublings (2, 3). MSCs can differentiate into skeletal lineages (osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic) and regulate immune cell function (4) predominantly through the release of cytokines and other immunosuppressive factors (5). The International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT) guidelines identifies MSCs as cells that exhibit tri-lineage differentiation in vitro and plastic adherence, alongside an expression profile of selected cell surface epitopes (e.g. typically presence of CD105, CD73 and CD90, and absence of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79α or CD19 and HLA-DR) (6). There has been some progress in identifying in vivo markers of MSC populations in mouse and human systems, which include LEPR, nestin, CD271, CD146 and CD164 (7), however, no single marker for MSCs exists in general use. Cells labelled as “MSCs” are used internationally in clinical trials but are rarely characterised [using ISCT or any other criteria (8)] and deliver variable success (9). The majority of trials assessing efficacy of MSCs currently aim to harness immunomodulatory properties (10), though widespread clinical translation is greatly hindered by insufficient data demonstrating strong and consistent clinical effect, mechanisms of action and diverse application of selection criteria (11). In addition, MSCs from different origins have been applied in clinical trials with varied outcomes for disorders including osteoarthritis (12–15), osteoporotic fracture repair (16), rheumatoid arthritis (17–19), type 1 diabetes mellitus (20), diabetic kidney disease (21), multiple sclerosis (22, 23), liver failure (24–26), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (27–30) and COVID-19 (31–33). Notably, although serious adverse events are extremely rare, mild, transient or acute adverse events occurring are often related to acute inflammation (13–16, 19, 21, 25, 29, 30), fever (pyrexia) (17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 30, 34), infection (12, 16, 21, 23, 30), allergic reactions/hypersensitivity (13, 15, 16, 19) and hematoma (13), all of which are implicated in immune responses. Studies examining heterogeneity in MSCs have identified multiple subpopulations of MSCs with varied potency for both differentiation and immunomodulation (35–40). Heterogeneous populations of MSC-like cells have been isolated from both adult and neonatal sources [e.g. bone marrow (41, 42), peripheral blood (43), adipose tissue (44, 45), synovial membrane and fluid (46, 47), dental pulp (48), endometrium (49), periodontal ligament (50), tendon (51), trabecular bone (52), umbilical cord (53, 54), umbilical cord blood (55, 56), placenta (57)]. There are further indications that MSC-like cells may be present in most vascularized tissues in some form (58, 59). This widespread distribution of MSC-like cells with varied differentiation capacities and fluctuations in the expression levels of characterizing surface markers has prompted increasing reports of unipotent tissue-specific MSCs, yet bone marrow-derived MSCs are generally considered to be a population composed entirely of cells possessing tripotent differentiation capacity (6). This raises the hypothesis that heterogeneous cell populations may collectively characterize as MSCs using ISCT (and other) criteria but comprise subsets of cells specialized to perform different functions. The widespread reporting of immunomodulatory capacities of MSCs and the impact of immune responses during tissue formation and comorbidity in degenerative disease highlights the likelihood of a nascent, endogenous population of cells that operate primarily to convey or control immune function. This population has the potential to support tissue regeneration rather than contributing to it. We previously demonstrated the heterogeneity of human MSCs through the identification of multiple subpopulations using a clonal isolation and immortalization strategy that enabled in-depth and reproducible characterization (60). These populations included an immune-primed MSC subtype identifiable through positive expression of CD317 (bone marrow stromal antigen-2 (BST2) or tetherin) and possessing enhanced immunomodulatory capacity. Here, we tested the hypothesis that CD317 positive (CD317pos) stromal cells function primarily to direct the immune response and do not contribute to tissue generation or repair in both physiological and pathological processes and therefore represent an identifiable MSC subtype.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Cell Culture

2.1.1 Immortalized MSC Lines and Primary Bone Marrow Derived Human MSCs

MSC lines immortalized with human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) were maintained in culture as previously described (60). Clonal hTERT-MSCs included the CD317pos Y202 and Y102 lines, and the CD317neg Y201 and Y101 lines. Low-passage (p1-p5) primary MSCs were isolated from femoral heads, obtained with informed consent during routine hip replacement or as explant cultures from human tibial plateaux after routine knee replacement (60). Primary MSCs were also established from bone marrow aspirates purchased from Lonza. Cells were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere incubators using DMEM (Gibco) culture medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Cells were routinely passaged at 80% confluence and re-seeded at approximately 3500 cells/cm2. hTERT cell lines have a consistent population doubling time of approximately 25 hours. Growth kinetics varied between primary donors.

2.1.2 Isolation of Primary T Cells From Tonsillectomy Tissue

Primary donor T cells were retrieved from tonsillectomy donations according to ethical approval. For primary MSC co-cultures, cryopreserved CD4+ human cord blood T cells were purchased from Stem Cell Technologies. T cells were isolated from mixed T and B cell cultures using nylon wool separation (61). T cells were seeded at a density of 1.0 x 106 cells/ml in an appropriately sized tissue culture flask. MSC co-cultures with isolated T cells were set up within 24 hours or cells were cryopreserved in 10% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in RPMI1640 medium and re-established in culture a minimum of 24 hours prior to use.

2.2 Rohart Test for Independent Confirmation of MSC Status

The Rohart MSC test was used as an independent measure for distinguishing MSCs from non-MSCs (62). The classifier has previously been validated against 1,291 samples from 65 studies derived on 15 different platforms, with >95% accuracy with 97.7% accuracy (62).

2.3 Flow Cytometry

MSCs were labelled using optimized concentrations of the required primary antibody or isotype control ( ). After washing, cells were stained with a fluorescent secondary antibody ( ), where conjugated primaries were not used. As appropriate, cells were washed as required prior to incubation with 1:1000 diluted sytox blue for 5 minutes. Analysis was conducted immediately following staining. Intracellular flow cytometry of MSC was performed on 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixed cells in the presence of 0.1% saponin (Sigma). All flow cytometry was performed on a Beckman Coulter CyAn ADP flow cytometer and analyzed with Summit v4.3 software, or using a Cytoflex S or LX and analyzed with FCS Express 7. Cell sorting was undertaken using a Beckman Coulter MoFlo Astrios and analyzed with summit v6.2 software or FCS Express 7. Sorted primary donor MSCs were separated based on CD317 expression with CD317neg represent by lowest CD317 expression in 26.26 ± 4.84% of cells and CD317pos representing the highest 2.20 ± 0.50% CD317-expressing cells to ensure no overlap between subpopulations. Intermediate CD317dim cells were not included in primary donor cell testing.

2.4 Processing of Mouse Femurs

Femurs were dissected from C57BL/6J female mice at ages 8-12 weeks immediately after sacrificing. All work was carried out under ethical approval from the University of York Department of Biology Ethics Committee and Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body. Muscle tissue was removed and femurs were fixed in 4% PFA for 24 hours at 4°C, followed by washing with PBS. Bones were then decalcified using 10% EDTA in PBS at pH 7.5 for 24 hours at 4°C. After decalcification, femurs were cryoprotected by submerging in 30% sucrose in PBS for 24 hours at 4°C. Bones were embedded in Optimal Cutting Temperature compound and sectioned using an OTF5000 cryostat (Bright Instruments Ltd.). Sections were collected on SuperFrost plus microscope slides (Thermofisher) and stored at -70°C.

2.5 Immunofluorescent Staining of Mouse Bone Tissues

Slides were allowed to reach room temperature. Sections were blocked for 45 minutes in 10% goat serum (Sigma) + 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS (10% donkey serum (Sigma) + 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS where goat primary antibody was used). Primary antibodies (LEPR, CD31, CD317) were diluted in 1% IgG-free Bovine Serum Albumin (Sigma) + 0.05% Tween-20 (Sigma) in PBS and sections incubated in the dark at 4°C overnight in a humidified chamber. All secondary antibodies were added at 1:300 dilution in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature in the dark then stained for 10 minutes with 0.2 µg/ml 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in PBS. Dried slides were mounted with Prolong Gold antifade mounting medium (Invitrogen) and #1.5 thickness glass coverslip (Scientific Laboratory Supplies). Slides were left to cure at room temperature in the dark for 24 hours prior to image capture using LSM880 or LSM780 (Zeiss) confocal microscopes with excitation wavelengths of 405 nm, 488 nm, 561 nm and 633 nm.

2.6 Proteomic Analysis of MSC Plasma Membranes

Plasma membranes were isolated from the hTERT immortalized clonal lines following the protocol of Holley et al. (63) before mass spectrometry and comparative proteomic analyses were performed by the Proteomics laboratory within the University of York Bioscience Technology Facility using LC-MS/MS (64) and Scaffold 4 proteome software for initial analysis using 3% false discovery rate. Further in-depth examination of protein expression was conducted using the KNIME analytics platform and ProteoWizard MSOpen technology (65).

2.7 Transwell Cell Migration Assays

Migration assays were performed in transwell polycarbonate membrane cell culture inserts with a 5µm pore (Corning, Sigma-Aldrich) using 1.25x105 hTERT and primary MSCs, and monocyte-like THP-1 and T cell-like HUT-78 (ECACC 88041901) cells in 6 well plates with 1.5 ml of serum-free DMEM. After 24 hours, 600 µl of supernatant or DMEM was added in duplicate to the wells of the transwell plates. Polycarbonate filters were carefully placed above supernatant and 2.5x105 of the appropriate cells in 100 µl serum-free RPMI-1640 were applied to the top of the filter and incubated for 5 hours before removing transwells. Migrated cells were assessed by flow cytometry. The percentage cells undergoing migration towards stimuli was calculated. For CCR2 testing, 500 nM CCR2 inhibitor was used (Teijin compound 1) in supernatant. Inhibition of migration was calculated as a percentage of cell total.

2.8 Examination of Gene Ontology Terms in Disease States for Comparison With hTERT MSC Lines

A bioinformatics comparison of the hTERT MSC lines gene expression data with publicly available transcriptomic data from a range of autoimmune and related disorders was undertaken to identify disease states that correlated with upregulated GO terms associated with the CD317pos Y102 and Y202 clonal MSC lines (60). Cross-platform validation was performed using Python and GeneSpring software was used to analyze outcomes. Datasets that were analyzed on Affymetrix microarray platforms were normalized to 75th percentile. For data analyzed on Agilent microarray platforms, Robust Multichip Algorithm normalization was used which included background correction, normalization and calculation of expression values. The differing normalization methods were due to GeneSpring default settings, but both methods reduce the level of environmental factors affecting the results. In all datasets baseline transformation was to the median of all samples, for each probe the median of the log summarized values from all the samples was calculated and subtracted from each of the samples. Differentially expressed genes were identified as greater than 2-fold upregulation in disease state compared to healthy controls, and GeneSpring was used to identify significance (p<0.05) in GO term occurrence. The 10 most upregulated GO terms were identified and comparisons made between autoimmune disease states and hTERT immortalized MSC lines.

2.9 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction

RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol for cell lysis and Machery-Nagel RNA Nucleospin II kit for RNA isolation, with RNA converted to cDNA for gene expression analyses using Superscript IV reverse transcriptase enzymes (Invitrogen). Specific primers for gene expression analyses were designed and optimized ( ). Gene expression analyses were performed as previously described (60). Gene expression of eight IFN-γ regulated genes, namely Ly6E, HERC5, IFI44L, ISG15, Mx1, Mx2, EPSTI1 and RSAD2 were amplified in qPCR and fold changes were calculated relative to the expression of the housekeeping gene RPS27a and relative to the Y201 cell line or CD317neg cells. The ΔΔCT fold changes were log2-transformed and averaged to calculate IFN-γ scores, as previously described (66, 67).

2.10 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays

To detect secreted proteins, supernatants from 100,000 cells incubated in 2.5 ml of serum free DMEM for 24 hours was analyzed for secreted proteins by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) using ELISA kits for CXCL10, CXCL11 (BioLegend); CCL2 (eBioscience); and SAA4 (Stratech) following manufacturers instructions.

2.11 PCR Molecular Diagnostics for Infectious Disease

Samples of hTERT lines Y201 and Y202 were tested externally and independently (Charles River) for viral contaminants using the Human Comprehensive cell line examination and report (CLEAR) Panel to detect RNA transcripts for 26 viral components, including virions commonly linked with autoimmune disorders (HIV, hepatitis, herpes simplex and herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus, BK virus, human T-Lymphotropic virus, Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and Cytomegalovirus) (68, 69). A low copy exogenous nucleic acid was added to sample lysis prior to nucleic acid isolation to serve as both a control to monitor for nucleic acid recovery and PCR inhibition. An RNA NRC was used to monitor reverse transcription for RNA virus assays. Nucleic acid recovery and PCR inhibition was monitored by a PCR assay specific for the NRC template.

2.12 T Cell Activation Assay

2.12.1 MSC Immunomodulation for Deactivation and Suppression of T Cell Proliferation

Co-culture of primary human tonsil T cells with hTERT MSC lines was used to assess the potential immunomodulatory impact of CD317neg (Y101, Y201) and CD317pos (Y102, Y202) cell lines on T cell proliferation and T helper differentiation. Continual proliferative capacity was used as a measure of T cell deactivation. hTERT MSC lines or CD317-sorted primary MSCs were seeded at a ratio of 1:10 with T cells with 1.0x104 MSCs seeded into a 96-well U bottomed plate and cultured for 24 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Primary human MSC were sorted for CD317 expression and co-cultured with commercially sourced cryopreserved CD4+ human cord blood T cells (Stem Cell Technologies). For assessment of proliferation, T cells were stained for 15 minutes at 37°C using 1 uM VPD450 Violet proliferation dye (eBioscience, Inc.). Unstained cells were used as a control. T cells were activated using anti-CD3ϵ/CD28 Dynabeads (Thermo Fisher) at a bead-to-cell ratio of 1:1 then seeded onto the MSC at a density of 1.0x105/well (ratio 10:1) in 200 μl RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS, 0.05 μg/mL IL-2 (Peprotech, Inc) or seeded alone (no MSCs) as a control. Plates were cultured for 5 days at 37°C. T cell proliferation was assessed following removal of Dynabeads with the DynaMag-2 as per manufacturer’s recommendations. Plates were cultured for 5 days at 37°C. T cell proliferation was assessed with flow cytometry, with reduction in signal intensity visualized for repeated proliferation peaks. Proliferation was assessed through VPD450 dilution (diminished staining intensity) described through a proliferative index (PI) calculated from the fluorescence intensity at each cell division as described previously (70). Proliferative cycles undertaken were calculated on 50% fluorescence intensity reduction peaks, measuring from fluorescence intensity of the first division and the final division detected.

2.12.2 MSC Immunomodulation to Direct Effector T Cell Polarization

For assessment of T helper differentiation, T cells were activated and cultured with hTERT MSC monolayers, as described above. The following reagents and antibodies for reactivation, transport inhibition and staining were sourced from eBioscience. Following 5 days of culture, T cells were re-stimulated using a combination of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml) (Sigma Aldrich) and Ionomycin (1 μg/ml) (Invitrogen) and intracellular cytokines retained using transport inhibitor cocktail with 10 μg/ml brefeldin A and 2 μM Monensin (Invitrogen). Cells were cultured for 4 hours at 37°C then stained for surface marker CD4. Intracellular staining for helper T cells was undertaken for anti-human IFN-γ (Th1), IL-4 (Th2) or IL17a (Th17) or CD4 and CD25 then fixation/permeabilization and staining for nuclear protein FOXP3 for regulatory T cells. All cells were measured using the CyAn ADP or Cytoflex LX flow cytometer and analyzed with FCS Express 7. Comparisons were drawn for percentage of T helper differentiation within the CD4+ cell population and signal intensity (Median) for each antibody tested.

2.13 In Vitro Human Skin Explant Model to Assess Cutaneous Tissue Damage

The human skin explant assay is an in vitro model previously used for evaluation of tissue damage induced by T cell or pro-inflammatory cytokine mediated immunopathological responses (71, 72). We used this assay to investigate the in situ activities of CD317neg Y201 and CD317pos Y202 MSCs. Skin samples were obtained with informed consent and approval of the local research ethics committee (REC14/NE/1136, NRES Committee North East, IRAS project ID 129780). Following 48 hours stimulation with IFN-γ or TNF-α (both at 5 ng/ml), Y201 and Y202 MSCs were harvested, washed and plated at a density of 1x105 cells/well in a 96 well round-bottomed plate. The cells were incubated for 3-4 hours to allow for adherence to the plastic. Two punch skin biopsies at 4 mm diameter taken from healthy volunteers were dissected into 10-12 sections of equal size. Each section was co-cultured with stimulated or unstimulated Y201 or Y202 in duplicate in a 200 μl total volume of DMEM supplemented with 20% heat–inactivated pooled human AB serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. Skin sections cultured in the culture medium containing 200 ng/ml IFN-γ or culture media alone were used as positive and background controls respectively. After 3-day culture, the skin sections were fixed in 10% formalin, then paraffin embedded and sectioned at 5 μm onto microscopic slides. The skin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) following routine protocols. The severity of histopathological tissue damage was evaluated by two independent evaluators according to the Lerner scoring criteria (73) as follows: grade 0, normal skin; grade I, mild vacuolization of epidermal basal cells; grade II, diffuse vacuolization of basal cells with scattered dyskeratotic bodies; grade III, subepidermal cleft formation; grade IV, complete epidermal separation (73). Grade II or above were considered positive while Grade I changes considered as background, which is observed in skin sections cultured in medium alone.

2.14 In Vivo Assessment of Immunomodulatory Capacity of hTERT MSC Lines in a Murine Peritonitis Model

To determine the immunomodulatory properties of hTERT MSC lines, an in vivo zymosan-induced peritonitis model was used in C57BL/6J mice aged 8-10 weeks as described previously (74, 75). These experiments were carried out in accordance with the Animals and Scientific Procedures Act 1986, under UK Home Office License (project license number PPL PFB579996 approved by the University of York Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board). At day 0, mice were administered with an intraperitoneal infusion of 1 mg of zymosan A (Merck) in 100 μl of PBS. Immediately following the administration of zymosan, test condition mice were administered an intraperitoneal infusion of 2.0x106 cells of either Y201 (CD317neg) or Y202 (CD317pos) in 100 μl of PBS; negative control mice were given PBS vehicle only. After 24 hours, mice were euthanized using CO2 overdose and cervical dislocation. Intraperitoneal injection of 4 ml of ice cold RPMI-1640 was administered as peritoneal lavage. The process was repeated with a second 4 ml RPMI-1640 wash and wash solutions pooled to form the peritoneal exudate cells (PEC). For each animal tested, red blood cells were lysed using Red Cell Lysis buffer (Merck) and a cell count performed. Spleens were retrieved from the mice and cell counts were recorded and a measure of spleen cellularity calculated. PEC samples were initially stained for Ly6C (APC), Ly6G (FITC), F4/80 (PE-Cy7) CD45 (PerCP-Cy5.5) (BioLegend) and Ly6G (FITC), CD11b (BUV395) and SiglecF (BV421) (BD). Both PEC and spleen samples were then stained for TCRb (AF488), CD3 (APC-Cy7), CD4 (PerCP-Cy5.5), CD62L (APC) and CD44 (PE) (BioLegend). Although at an early timepoint, spleen samples were additionally examined for T cell polarization looking at T effector cells CD8 (PerCP-Cy5.5), CD4 (APC), IL4 (AF488), IFN-γ (PE) and IL17a (BV421) (BioLegend) and T reg cells using CD8 (PerCP-Cy5.5), CD4 (APC), CD25 (PE) and FOXP3 (AF488) (BioLegend). For all tests, Zombie Aqua (BioLegend) was used to exclude dead cells ( ).

2.15 In Vivo Assay to Assess Tissue Forming Capacity of hTERT MSC Lines

All procedures used were approved by the University of Leeds Ethics Committee and under the UK Home Office Project License (PPL:70/8549). The tissue-forming capacity of CD317neg and CD317pos hTERT cell lines CD317neg Y201 and CD317pos Y202 was assessed in CD1 nude mice (Charles River) aged 8-10 weeks in an in vivo transplantation assay (76). 2.0 x 106 MSC cell suspension in 1 ml medium was added to 40 mg hydroxyapatite (HA) synthetic bone particles (Zimmer Biomet) of 250-1000 μm size and rotated at approximately 25 rpm at 37°C for 100 minutes to allow cells to attach. HA particles were bound using fibrin glue comprising 30 μl thrombin (400 I.U./ml in DMEM medium) mixed 1:1 with fibrinogen (115 mg/ml in 0.85% saline solution). Implants were delivered subcutaneously into immunocompromised nude mice with two constructs placed into each mouse. Transplants were harvested at 3 and 8 weeks, fixed in 4% PFA, decalcified for 7 days in 10% EDTA then stored overnight in 70% ethanol prior to paraffin embedding, sectioning and staining with H&E, Alcian Blue and Syrius Red (Thermo Fisher).

2.16 Statistical Analysis

Data were tested for equal variance and normality using D’Agostino & Pearson omnibus normality test. Differences between groups were compared using two-tailed 1-way ANOVA for parametric data or Kruskall-Wallis for non-parametric testing. For two factor analysis, data was analyzed with a two-tailed 2-way ANOVA. Bonferroni post-hoc testing was conducted to compare between groups. All statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 24.0, or GraphPad Prism version 5.0-9.0 with P<0.05 deemed statistically significant. Results are annotated as *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 and all averaged values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

3 Results

3.1 MSC Identity of CD317-Expressing Stromal Cells

In our previous work we isolated nullipotent, CD317pos MSC lines (Y102 and Y202) alongside differentiation-competent, CD317neg MSC lines (Y101 and Y201) from the same heterogeneous donor source suggesting that a subpopulation of stromal cells exists in typical MSC preparations but may not contribute to ‘classic’ MSC functions. Here, we examined the stromal phenotype the CD317pos and CD317neg MSC lines. An in silico assessment using the Rohart Test (62) was applied to accurately discriminate MSCs from fibroblasts, other adult stem/progenitor cell types and differentiated stromal cells. This test uses 16 key MSC marker genes as a proven panel of identifiers that has independently confirmed MSC status with 97.85% accuracy in 635 cell samples (62). All of the immortalized CD317neg and CD317pos stromal cell lines maintained gene expression patterns that independently confirmed their MSC status ( and ). Next, we used mass spectrometry to determine cell surface protein expression profiles across the different cell lines. We identified a high number of commonly expressed proteins alongside cell line-specific variations. Using a false detection rate of 3%, we found 2338 proteins expressed across all MSC lines, with 584 (65.2%) of these commonly expressed ( ), which may reveal a common stromal surfaceome signature ( ). Percentage similarity at the surfaceomic level ranged from 76.0% to 83.5% ( ). Unique proteins were identified in Y101 (20 proteins, 2.2%); Y102 (30 proteins, 3.3%); Y201 (36 proteins, 4.0%); and Y202 (21 proteins, 2.3%). These analyses also confirmed that CD317 (BST2) was only identified on Y102 and Y202 MSC lines ( ). Principle component analysis (PCA) was used to aid interpretation of mass spectrometry data through dimensionality reduction. Analysis highlighted that MSC lines clustered distinctly within the whole population but were on a similar spectrum of observation, with Y102 and Y202 lines lying further from the mean of the whole population ( ). Together, these data demonstrate that the CD317neg Y101 and Y201 cell lines, and the CD317pos Y102 and Y202 cell lines have broadly similar protein expression profiles in common with other MSC preparations and may be used as models for different MSC subtypes.

3.2 Identification of CD317dim and CD317bright Populations in Primary MSCs

We previously reported a CD317pos MSC subset with average frequency of 1-3% in low passage primary MSCs (60). Here, using flow cytometry analysis with Y201 and Y202 populations gating for primary cells as either CD317neg or CD317pos, we were able to demonstrate that CD317 positivity can be subdivided into CD317dim and CD317bright populations in primary MSC cultures ( , ). Further examination of n=24 primary MSC populations (passages 1-4) recorded proportions at CD317neg (70.57 ± 5.09%) and CD317pos (29.77 ± 3.00%), comprising CD317dim (28.10 ± 4.60%) and CD317bright (1.67 ± 0.58%) ( ). We observed a decrease in CD317 expression in these cells over time in culture (passages 1-4), however this trend did not reach statistical significance due to the variability of initial proportions of CD317pos cells when CD317dim was included as a CD317 positive result (means passage 1 = 50.66 ± 27.63%, passage 2 = 30.35 ± 6.03%, passage 3 = 26.07 ± 11.78%, passage 4 = 22.18 ± 12.26%; n=2,12,7,3) ( ). We made a similar observation when examining subsets of CD317dim and CD317bright cells, with CD317bright cells almost absent by passage 4 ( ). CD317 expression in isolated primary MSCs from passage 3 to 4 reduced by 49.01 ± 11.84% (n=5); with a freeze/thaw cycle at passage 3, this reduction was recorded at 63.94 ± 3.64% in the same cells (n=5) ( ). Therefore, human primary MSC isolates express CD317 on a spectrum that varies from cell to cell and from individual to individual; the overall proportion of CD317pos MSCs, as a composite of CD317dim and CD317bright, is 28-29% in heterogeneous MSC cultures (combining all analyses of primary cell donors, percent CD317pos MSCs is 28.44 ± 3.82% (mean ± SEM), range of 0.01-93.03%; median=19.89%; n=52). Within CD317pos cells, there was no difference in percentage CD317 expression based upon donor gender (mean expression female 40.02 ± 5.27; male 24.77 ± 6.51; Mann Whitney T-test p=0.051, n=52) or correlation between donor age and CD317 expression [mean age: 69.75 ± 1.29 years; range 45-88; Pearson correlation p=0.141, n=52)], ( ). There was, however, a significant negative correlation between CD317 expression and BMI (mean 28.06 ± 0.78; range 17-44; Spearman correlation p<0.05, n=52) ( ). Y201 cells represent CD317bright subpopulations, so for all subsequent tests using primary donor cells, CD317pos represents only CD317bright cells and CD317dim cells were excluded from testing.
Figure 1

Analysis of CD317-expressing MSC populations within primary cell isolates. (A) The CD317 expressing populations can be divided into CD317bright and CD317dim with CD317bright MSCs. (B) Average proportions of CD317neg and CD317pos, comprising CD317dim and CD317bright, in primary MSCs lines. (C) Expression of CD317 over early passages 1 to 4 in Primary MSCs with CD317neg increasing, CD317dim and CD317bright decreasing during in vitro culture (n=2-12). Variation of CD317 expression with gender (D), age (E) and BMI (F) in primary donors (n=52). (G) Isolated MSCs from human primary donors showed CD317pos (CD317dim and CD317bright combined) with mean values of CD317pos, CD146pos, CD271pos and CD164pos (n=27). (H) Examination of the CD317pos population only, showed similar proportions of each marker to those seen in the whole population (n=27). (I) CD317 expression was detected throughout the bone marrow of mice with low frequency colocalization of CD317 and LEPR+ in peri-sinusoidal regions (arrows).

Analysis of CD317-expressing MSC populations within primary cell isolates. (A) The CD317 expressing populations can be divided into CD317bright and CD317dim with CD317bright MSCs. (B) Average proportions of CD317neg and CD317pos, comprising CD317dim and CD317bright, in primary MSCs lines. (C) Expression of CD317 over early passages 1 to 4 in Primary MSCs with CD317neg increasing, CD317dim and CD317bright decreasing during in vitro culture (n=2-12). Variation of CD317 expression with gender (D), age (E) and BMI (F) in primary donors (n=52). (G) Isolated MSCs from human primary donors showed CD317pos (CD317dim and CD317bright combined) with mean values of CD317pos, CD146pos, CD271pos and CD164pos (n=27). (H) Examination of the CD317pos population only, showed similar proportions of each marker to those seen in the whole population (n=27). (I) CD317 expression was detected throughout the bone marrow of mice with low frequency colocalization of CD317 and LEPR+ in peri-sinusoidal regions (arrows). We previously demonstrated that the hTERT immortalized MSC lines display typical (ISCT) surface marker profiles (60). Here, we also examined surface markers commonly associated with human stromal progenitor cells or subsets, including CD146, CD271 and CD164, within CD317neg and CD317pos primary MSC populations. Isolated MSCs from human primary donors showed CD317pos (CD317dim and CD317bright populations combined) with mean % expression values of CD317pos (52.90 ± 5.89%), CD146pos (19.46 ± 3.07%), CD271pos (4.025 ± 0.71%) and CD164pos (95.03 ± 2.11%) (n=27) ( ). Examination of the CD317pos population only showed similar proportions of each marker to those seen in the whole population: CD146pos (24.21 ± 3.23%), CD271pos (7.78 ± 1.35%) and CD164pos (97.18 ± 0.66%) (n=27) ( ). These findings demonstrate that expression of these markers is independent of CD317 positivity and that CD164 identifies virtually all CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs. Comparative gene expression analysis has previously demonstrated a correlation between murine peri-sinusoidal stromal cells and CD317pos MSCs (77). LEPR has been shown to mark peri-sinusoidal stromal cells in mouse tissue (78). Here we investigated CD317pos/LEPRpos stromal cells in mouse bone marrow to identify the in vivo location of this subpopulation. CD317 expression was detected throughout the bone marrow with low frequency colocalization of CD317 with LEPR restricted to peri-sinusoidal regions adjacent to CD31-positive endothelial cells ( ).

3.3 Immune Profile of CD317pos MSCs

Our previous transcriptomic data indicated that CD317pos Y102 and Y202 MSC lines display a constitutive immunostimulatory expression profile (60), which we sought to define here using the MSC lines and primary cells sorted based on CD317 expression. We confirmed by qPCR that ICAM1 (CD54) mRNA levels were significantly elevated in CD317pos Y102/Y202 compared to CD317neg Y101 ( ). Although ICAM1 mRNA expression levels appeared similar in primary MSCs sorted for CD317 positivity ( ), flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that cell surface ICAM1 expression, as shown by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), was significantly increased on CD317pos primary MSCs versus CD317neg MSCs and CD317pos Y102/Y202 versus CD317neg Y101/Y201 ( ). Comparative analysis of CXCL10 and CXCL11 mRNA levels in immortalized MSC lines and primary MSCs sorted for CD317 demonstrated significantly increased expression in all CD317-positive MSCs compared to CD317-negative counterparts (n=7; experiments performed in triplicate) ( ).
Figure 2

Examination of the immune profile of CD317pos MSCs. (A) Comparative mRNA expression of ICAM-1 in MSC lines and primary cells sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 3 different donors or 5 cell line passages; qPCR performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of ICAM-1 expression on the cell surface of MSC lines and primary MSCs differentially gated by CD317 staining (MSCs from 5 different donors or 4 different passages of MSC lines were stained for flow cytometry, mean shown ± SEM). (C)/(D) Comparative (mean ± SEM) mRNA expression of CXCL10 (red) and CXCL11 (blue) in MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted for CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 7 different donors/7 different cell passages; experiments were performed in triplicate). (E/F) CXCL10 secretion by MSC lines prior to IFN-γ priming and after priming with baseline (unprimed) secretion subtracted (mean ± SEM, n=2). (G/H) Comparative mRNA expression of 8 IFN-γ signature genes in MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 5 different donors/5 different cell passages; experiments were performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (I)/(J) IFN-γ score for MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (n=5)*/** = significance at P<0.05/0.01 using an appropriate statistical test.

Examination of the immune profile of CD317pos MSCs. (A) Comparative mRNA expression of ICAM-1 in MSC lines and primary cells sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 3 different donors or 5 cell line passages; qPCR performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of ICAM-1 expression on the cell surface of MSC lines and primary MSCs differentially gated by CD317 staining (MSCs from 5 different donors or 4 different passages of MSC lines were stained for flow cytometry, mean shown ± SEM). (C)/(D) Comparative (mean ± SEM) mRNA expression of CXCL10 (red) and CXCL11 (blue) in MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted for CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 7 different donors/7 different cell passages; experiments were performed in triplicate). (E/F) CXCL10 secretion by MSC lines prior to IFN-γ priming and after priming with baseline (unprimed) secretion subtracted (mean ± SEM, n=2). (G/H) Comparative mRNA expression of 8 IFN-γ signature genes in MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 5 different donors/5 different cell passages; experiments were performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (I)/(J) IFN-γ score for MSC lines/primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (n=5)*/** = significance at P<0.05/0.01 using an appropriate statistical test. CD317, ICAM-1 and CXCL10 are regulated by interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). We analyzed expression levels of the IFN-γ receptor by flow cytometry and demonstrated that it was expressed at similar levels in all four MSC lines, independent of CD317 expression (MFI, Y101 = 9.11, Y201 = 8.41, Y102 = 9.60, Y202 = 9.84; p>0.05) ( ). This finding suggested that all MSC lines were capable of responding to IFN-γ stimulation in a similar manner, but CD317-positive MSCs may be primed to transduce IFN-γ stimulation more effectively. Secretion of CXCL10 was measured in immortalized MSC lines with ( ) and without ( ) IFN-γ exposure. Under basal, unstimulated conditions, CD317pos Y102/Y202 MSCs secrete larger amounts of CXCL10 compared to CD317neg Y101/Y201. Following IFN-γ priming, CD317pos MSC lines demonstrate a significantly increased ability to secrete additional amounts of CXCL10 compared to CD317neg MSC lines. However, IFN-γ has a proportionally much larger stimulatory effect on CXCL10 secretion by CD317neg Y101/Y201 cells, suggesting that constitutive interferon signaling is a feature of CD317pos MSC lines ( ). Examination of a further panel of eight IFN-γ related genes showed remarkably different expression between CD317pos and CD317neg MSCs ( ). Using a method described by Raterman et al (67), we generated an IFN-γ signature score for CD317pos and CD317neg MSCs using the average of the log base-2 normalized relative fold changes of the eight IFN-γ related genes. We demonstrated that CD317pos MSC lines and primary MSCs had a significantly increased IFN-γ signature score compared to CD317neg MSCs ( ). We have previously provided a detailed analysis of transcriptomic data from Y101, Y201, Y102 and Y202 MSC lines (60). Here, we examined combined CD317neg and CD317pos datasets and any association with human disease conditions. Bioinformatics analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using combined transcriptomic data (60) from CD317neg (Y101 & Y201) and CD317pos (Y102 & Y202) MSC lines identified 2340 significantly upregulated genes in CD317pos MSC samples (FC>2, p<0.05) with clear clustering of the Y01 group (Y101, Y201) and the Y02 group (Y102, Y202) ( ). The 10 most significantly upregulated genes in the CD317pos group were immune-related and/or interferon-regulated, including OAS1, OASL, RSAD2 and CD317 (BST2) ( ). IFN signaling and elevated IFN-signatures are associated with different human disease states (79). When comparing the upregulated Y102/Y202 gene sets with six publicly available transcriptomic databases for autoimmune and related disorders ( , ), we identified a significant association between DEGs and GO terms that were enriched in Y102/Y202 MSC lines and psoriasis, eczema and, to a lesser extent, rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis ( ). Similar observations were made when comparing enriched signaling pathways across Y102/Y202 and disease datasets ( ). Therefore, a resident MSC subtype can be identified as CD317posICAM-1hiCXCL10hi with apparent constitutive interferon signaling, which is likely to contribute to specific physiological and pathological immune functions.

3.4 Roles of CD317pos and CD317neg MSCs in Monocyte and T Cell Function

Immunomodulation may be affected through paracrine signaling altering cell recruitment and retention in response to signaling molecule expression. The CCL2 receptor, CCR2, is a monocyte chemoattractant receptor protein involved in macrophage activation in cells expressing high levels of CCL2. Significantly higher CCL2 mRNA expression and protein secretion was detected in CD317 expressing MSCs versus CD317-negatives ( ).
Figure 3

Influence of CD317neg MSCs and of CD317pos MSCs on immune cell function (A) Comparative mRNA expression of CCL2 in primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 7 different donors; experiments performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (B) CCL2 secretion in primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression and MSC lines (from 4 different donors/4 different cell line passages; experiments performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (C) In vitro co-culture of hTERT immortalized lines Y201 and Y202 and primary CD317neg and CD317pos cells with activated T cells. CD317neg cells reduce proportion of proliferating T cells and number of cell cycles achieved (D) hTERT cell lines significantly reduce proportion of proliferating cells as demonstrated through proliferative index (E) CD317neg cell lines reduce proliferative cycles achieved by activated T cells in comparison to CD317pos or T cell alone controls. (F) assessment of the influence of MSC on T cell polarization in co-culture demonstrates CD317pos cells influence activated T cells to preferentially polarize towards IFN-γ expressing (Th1) subset with indications of increased IL17a+ and CD25+FOXP3+ expressing cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Influence of CD317neg MSCs and of CD317pos MSCs on immune cell function (A) Comparative mRNA expression of CCL2 in primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression (RNA was extracted from 7 different donors; experiments performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (B) CCL2 secretion in primary MSCs sorted by CD317 expression and MSC lines (from 4 different donors/4 different cell line passages; experiments performed in triplicate, mean shown ± SEM). (C) In vitro co-culture of hTERT immortalized lines Y201 and Y202 and primary CD317neg and CD317pos cells with activated T cells. CD317neg cells reduce proportion of proliferating T cells and number of cell cycles achieved (D) hTERT cell lines significantly reduce proportion of proliferating cells as demonstrated through proliferative index (E) CD317neg cell lines reduce proliferative cycles achieved by activated T cells in comparison to CD317pos or T cell alone controls. (F) assessment of the influence of MSC on T cell polarization in co-culture demonstrates CD317pos cells influence activated T cells to preferentially polarize towards IFN-γ expressing (Th1) subset with indications of increased IL17a+ and CD25+FOXP3+ expressing cells. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. In the presence of an antagonist for CCR2, migration of monocytic cells (THP-1) towards supernatant from CD317-expressing MSC lines was selectively inhibited compared to CD317-negative MSC lines (Y101, Y201 vs Y102, Y202; 19.37 ± 9.57, 19.61 ± 8.89 vs 39.01 ± 6.57, 41.02 ± 4.79) ( ). We tested whether the supernatant of CD317pos and CD317neg MSCs could induce the migration of both monocytic (THP-1) and T cell (HUT-78) lines in transwell assays. We demonstrated that both THP-1 and HUT-78 cells migrated towards MSC supernatants suggesting that MSCs secrete both monocyte and T cell chemoattractants ( ). MSCs have previously been shown to suppress activated T cell proliferation whilst maintaining inactivated T cell viability in co-culture (80). Several mechanisms are proposed that provide evidence for IFN-γ mediated immunosuppression (81), potentially achieving MSC deactivation of T cells through IFN-γ receptor targeting or IFN-γ-mediated induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) from MSCs, whereby tryptophan is catabolized leading to suppression of T cell proliferation and subsequent apoptosis of activated T cells, leaving inactivated T cells in a viable state (82, 83). In this work, T cell proliferation was assessed for peaks of gradual division (proliferative index) (70) and proliferative cycles (population doublings) (84) over 5 days of co-culture with or without CD317pos and CD317neg MSC cell lines ( ). T cells do not proliferate in culture, unless activated with anti-CD3/CD28, and undergo cell death in absence of IL-2, which is produced in vivo by activated T cells (85). Compared to T cells alone, all MSC lines and CD317neg primary MSCs significantly reduced proliferative index scores, whereas CD317pos primary MSCs had no significant effect on T cell proliferative index ( ). Assessment of T cell proliferative cycles showed significant reductions when cultured with CD317neg Y101/Y201 and CD317neg primary MSCs ( ) compared to T cells alone. However, CD317pos Y102/Y202 MSCs and CD317pos primary MSCs did not significantly reduce the number of proliferative cycles, although a decline was observed ( ). These results demonstrate that CD317pos MSCs are capable of inactivating a proportion of proliferating T cells, although this effect is not sufficient to reduce the number of proliferative cycles that the residual activated cells achieve, pointing to a diminished immunosuppressive function for CD317pos MSCs. Next, we determined the effect of CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs on the polarization of naïve T cells into effector lineages with immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory function. CD317pos MSC lines induced a significant increase in the development of pro-inflammatory Th1 cells. Both Y102 (20.32 ± 0.92%, p<0.001) and Y202 (15.11 ± 1.46%, p<0.05) increased Th1 polarization, as indicated by IFN-γ expression, in comparison to T cells alone (8.79 ± 2.30%), CD317neg Y101 (9.25 ± 0.42%, p < 0.001 (Y102)) and Y201 (7.31 ± 0.60%, p <0.001 (Y102), p <0.01 (Y202)) (One way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test). An increase was also observed in Th2 cells for all MSC lines (p>0.05, n.s.). Both Th17 and Treg cells, as indicated by IL17a and CD25/FOXP3 expression respectively, increased slightly with CD317pos MSC lines, but not statistically significantly. By examining total proportions of differentiating cells, it was notable that a large proportion of CD4+ T cells cultured alone did not commit to any lineage when compared to co-culture with MSC lines. When proportions are summated, only 48.49% of T cells cultured alone differentiated into the 4 lineages examined, whilst approximately 75% (Y101), 90% (Y201) and 100% (Y102, Y202) differentiation into these lineages was observed when T cells were co-cultured with MSC lines ( ).

3.5 Pro-Inflammatory and Immuno-Regulatory Potential of CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs In Vitro and In Vivo

Considering the stark differences in immune profiles of CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs, we tested their effects in different inflammatory models. Prior to in vitro and in vivo testing, we confirmed the representative CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs (Y201, Y202) were not affected by viral contamination as a potential origin or contributor to constitutive IFN-γ expression. All cell samples were tested in triplicate and returned negative results for molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases (Human Comprehensive CLEAR Panel, Charles River) using PCR for RNA representing a panel of 26 virions. Initially, we investigated the potential pro-inflammatory property of CD317neg Y201 and CD317pos Y202 MSCs in a skin explant model, which is an in vitro tool to detect the presence of cutaneous tissue damage following a pro-inflammatory insult (86, 87). CD317neg Y201 and CD317pos Y202 MSCs were primed with IFN-γ or TNF-α and co-cultured in vitro with skin explants. In this assessment, no tissue damage was observed after skin co-incubation with CD317neg Y201 cells in all conditions tested ( top panel and left panel). In contrast, cutaneous tissue damage was detected when skin was co-cultured with unstimulated or TNF-α stimulated CD317pos Y202 cells showing clear cleft formation in the basal layer between the dermis and epidermis ( bottom panel and right panel). When comparing the ability to cause tissue damage, Y202 cells caused significantly increased damage compared to Y201 cells in unstimulated and TNF-α stimulated conditions (p<0.05) whilst no cutaneous tissue damage was observed when skin was co-cultured with IFN-γ stimulated Y202 cells.
Figure 4

In vitro and in vivo immunomodulation by CD317neg Y201 or CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (A) Representative images of skin explants independently assessed for damage to tissues, examining keratinocytes, basal cells, keratotic bodies, the appearance of sub-epidermal clefts at the junction with the dermis and in highly damaged tissue the appearance of complete epidermal separation following treatment with MSCs primed with IFN-γ or TNF-α and co-cultured in vitro. (B) Y201 co-culture did not prompt damage to the tissue in any conditions whilst Y202 cell line demonstrated marked tissue damage in untreated cells and TNF-α treated cell lines. Both Y201 and Y202 cell lines retained the ability to inhibit tissue damage when primed with IFN-γ. (C) MSCs subsequently applied to an in vivo peritonitis model of inflammation showed immunomodulation through reduced immune cell recruitment, (D) reduced macrophage development following Y201 treatment, (E) increased central memory T cell development following Y201 treatment and (F) reduced CD8+ cytotoxic T cell development following Y202 treatment. n=3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

In vitro and in vivo immunomodulation by CD317neg Y201 or CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (A) Representative images of skin explants independently assessed for damage to tissues, examining keratinocytes, basal cells, keratotic bodies, the appearance of sub-epidermal clefts at the junction with the dermis and in highly damaged tissue the appearance of complete epidermal separation following treatment with MSCs primed with IFN-γ or TNF-α and co-cultured in vitro. (B) Y201 co-culture did not prompt damage to the tissue in any conditions whilst Y202 cell line demonstrated marked tissue damage in untreated cells and TNF-α treated cell lines. Both Y201 and Y202 cell lines retained the ability to inhibit tissue damage when primed with IFN-γ. (C) MSCs subsequently applied to an in vivo peritonitis model of inflammation showed immunomodulation through reduced immune cell recruitment, (D) reduced macrophage development following Y201 treatment, (E) increased central memory T cell development following Y201 treatment and (F) reduced CD8+ cytotoxic T cell development following Y202 treatment. n=3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Interferon signaling genes are regulated by interferon in host-pathogen interactions. It is hypothesized that constitutive interferon signaling occurs to provide a rapid response to pathogen infections through pre-established interferon signature (79), such as that observed here in CD317pos MSCs. To investigate the potential for constitutive IFN-γ related signaling on innate immune responses in vivo, we evaluated immune regulation by CD317neg and CD317pos MSCs in a zymosan-induced peritonitis model of acute inflammation that promotes the recruitment of monocytes and neutrophils to the peritoneal cavity. Following zymosan treatment, peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) were collected by lavage and analysis performed on the cell content. A gating strategy was devised for flow cytometric analysis of multiple PEC cell types focusing on hematopoietic, myeloid and lymphoid cells including monocytes, macrophages and T cells ( ). Treatment with either Y201 or Y202 MSC lines suppressed the recruitment of inflammation-related cells to the area. There was a significant reduction in total cells recruited in both Y201 (3.552 ± 1.543 x 106) and Y202 (2.076 ± 0.421 x 106) treated conditions compared to zymosan-induced peritonitis without treatment (9.686 ± 1.894 x 106) (p<0.05), with no significant difference between MSC-treated animal PEC numbers and PBS controls (4.420 ± 1.790 x 105) ( ). Examination of the composition of PEC showed that zymosan-induced peritonitis prompted a significant increase in hematopoietic cells (p<0.05). No difference in recruitment of eosinophils or neutrophils was observed in MSC-treated mice when compared to zymosan alone or PBS controls ( ). Examination of the production of monocytes and macrophages in PEC samples showed no differences in monocyte recruitment, however both zymosan alone and zymosan plus Y202 showed significant increases in macrophage proportions compared to PBS controls (p<0.001, p<0.05 respectively) whilst Y201 treatment suppressed macrophage numbers (p<0.05) ( ). Within these monocyte and macrophage populations, the proportions of Ly6C positive and negative cells matched the proportions seen in zymosan treatment only animals ( ). Ly6C positive monocytes and macrophages are linked with pro-inflammatory responses by CCR2/CCL2 mediated homing to sites of tissue injury, whilst Ly6C low or negative monocytes and macrophages are reparative, guided by VCAM-1 and other adhesion proteins (88, 89). Spleens retrieved from MSC-treated and control mice were homogenized and analysed for naïve and polarized T cells, and memory T cells. No differences were found in the mass or cellularity of spleens between controls and MSC-treated animals (data not shown). When tested, a significant increase was found in activated CD4+ central memory T cells (TcM) in CD317neg Y201 cell treated conditions (14.23 ± 0.06%) in comparison to PBS controls (4.53 ± 0.18%) or Y202 treated animals (5.89 ± 4.30) ( ). CD4+ effector T cell polarization was not altered by introduction of zymosan or MSC treatments within the 24 hour time period measured. However, treatment with either CD317neg Y201 (1.51 ± 0.57%) or CD317pos Y202 (0.84 ± 0.25%) MSCs suppressed CD8a/b+ expression representative of cytotoxic T cell production in mice in comparison to CD8a/b+ expression in untreated animals (5.42 ± 1.10%) ( ).

3.6 In Vivo Tissue Formation Is Enhanced in CD317neg MSC Lines When Compared to CD317pos Subpopulations

We hypothesized that the immunomodulatory enhancements observed in CD317-positive MSCs would impact on their tissue-forming capacity. To test this hypothesis, CD317neg (Y201) and CD317pos (Y202) MSC lines were loaded onto hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds and implanted subcutaneously in nude mice. Scaffolds were retrieved at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation and examined using histological analysis for de novo tissue formation by deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM), collagen and neoangiogenesis. CD317neg Y201 MSCs showed clearly advanced ECM and collagen deposition in histological stains using Sirius Red for collagen formation and Alcian Blue for proteoglycan synthesis ( ), suggestive of a more stable capacity for tissue formation. Haematoxylin and eosin staining showed evidence of tissue formation from 3 weeks post implantation in CD317neg MSCs alongside evidence at 8 week timepoints of capillary tube structures containing blood cells indicative of neoangiogenesis ( ). Although there was some evidence of tissue formation in CD317pos Y202-loaded scaffolds, the tissue formed appeared less continuous or cohesive compared to CD317neg Y201 samples and by 8 weeks post-implantation there was clear evidence of disaggregation and cleft formation at the surface of HA particle clusters following histological staining for ECM formation (Alcian Blue and Sirius Red) with no detectable vessel formation ( ).
Figure 5

In vivo tissue generation in HA scaffolds loaded with CD317neg Y201 or CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (A, B) Histological staining of recovered implants using Sirius Red for collagen formation and (C) Alcian Blue for proteoglycan synthesis at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation in HA scaffolds loaded with either CD317neg Y201 MSCs and CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (D) Haematoxylin and eosin staining comparting tissue and blood vessel formation at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation in HA scaffolds loaded with CD317neg Y201 MSCs and CD317pos Y202 MSCs. Scale bars = 250μm (Part A Scale bars = 500μm). Asterisks = HA particles, arrows = blood vessels. *p < 0.05.

In vivo tissue generation in HA scaffolds loaded with CD317neg Y201 or CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (A, B) Histological staining of recovered implants using Sirius Red for collagen formation and (C) Alcian Blue for proteoglycan synthesis at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation in HA scaffolds loaded with either CD317neg Y201 MSCs and CD317pos Y202 MSCs. (D) Haematoxylin and eosin staining comparting tissue and blood vessel formation at 3 and 8 weeks post-implantation in HA scaffolds loaded with CD317neg Y201 MSCs and CD317pos Y202 MSCs. Scale bars = 250μm (Part A Scale bars = 500μm). Asterisks = HA particles, arrows = blood vessels. *p < 0.05.

4 Discussion

This study investigated the characteristics and properties of a CD317pos subpopulation within heterogeneous MSCs and their ability to contribute to immune responses and tissue repair. We used immortalized MSC model lines and primary MSCs isolates to elucidate the biology and potential impact on the therapeutic application of these cells. Here, we confirm CD317pos MSCs represent a subpopulation of cells commonly found in human MSCs preparations with an equal distribution in a range of demographic groups and health conditions. We found that rare CD317-expressing cells colocalized with LEPR-positivity adjacent to endothelial cells at marrow sinusoids, and in vivo location consistent with other bone marrow stromal cell preparations (78, 90). CD317pos MSCs may therefore interact with and be regulated by endothelial cells in a perivascular niche, similar to those described for other stem and progenitor cell types (91, 92), but further investigation is required. Using in vitro and in vivo functional assays, we demonstrate that CD317pos MSCs have reduced immunomodulatory and tissue-forming capacity compared to CD317neg MSCs, suggesting that CD317pos cells will not contribute to tissue repair or de novo tissue formation. Any contribution of CD317pos cells in therapy, when delivered within an undefined heterogeneous MSC culture, is therefore likely to be through immunomodulatory influence, and the contribution to the regenerative process is dependent upon the therapeutic target and the inflammatory environment present in the recipient at the time of transplantation. Given the potential for CD317pos MSCs to respond to the inflammatory environment in vivo, these cells may serve a positive function in assisting the repair of damaged tissues by CD317neg MSCs when transplanted as part of a heterogeneous population. However, our in vivo results demonstrate that CD317neg cells are capable of inducing both anti-inflammatory immunomodulation and tissue regeneration in the absence of CD317pos counterparts, suggesting the support function is not vital to successful repair of damaged tissue by CD317neg MSCs alone. Of note, when supplied in sufficient numbers CD317pos MSCs are capable of causing tissue damage, as observed in our skin explant model, which may be linked to their distinctive immune profile and functional differences to CD317neg MSCs. Qualitative histological analysis of tissue generation was not subjected to quantification. Further work should be done to fully evaluate the extent and quality of tissue repair formed using both CD317pos and CD317neg MSC lines and primary donor cells to enable more firm conclusions to be drawn. Inflammation serves a dual role in tissue repair. Cells in the immune response, such as neutrophils, function to initiate the repair process. Neutrophils cause tissue breakdown during inflammation but in the absence of neutrophils, macrophages rapidly recruited to the site of injury will display reduced rate of tissue regeneration owing to the presence of cell debris normally phagocytosed by neutrophils (93). Our results from MSC treatment of zymosan-induced peritonitis in mice showed a neutrophil population present in PEC suspensions from PBS injected mice, and significantly increased neutrophils present in the PEC of both zymosan-only and MSC-treated mice. However, examination of subsequent macrophage populations showed that whilst no macrophages were detected in the PBS control mice, both zymosan-only and CD317pos MSC plus zymosan conditions displayed significant increases in macrophage numbers. Significantly fewer cells, including macrophages, were recruited in the presence of CD317neg MSCs compared to zymosan only induction, therefore CD317pos MSCs fail to inhibit macrophage recruitment. The influence of CD317pos MSCs on T cells appears to be highly modulated in comparison to CD317neg MSCs. MSCs have been widely shown to deactivate T cells in vitro and suppress T cell proliferation whilst directing CD4+ effector T cells from Th1 to Th2 profile (80, 94–101). However, in activated T cells in cell to cell contact with CD317pos MSCs, we observed minimal deactivation of T cells and continued T cell proliferation, in conjunction with an active increase in Th1 polarization, contrary to the widely accepted immunosuppressive properties of MSCs. IFN-γ stimulation of MSCs has been shown to induce activation through upregulation of HLA class II, pushing the MSC towards antigen-presenting capability for immune regulation, promoting T cell interactions and potentially influencing CD8+ T cell activation (102). This may go towards explaining the results we observe when CD317pos cells interact with T cells in vitro and T and B cells in vivo. CD317pos MSCs show minimal interaction with T cells in vitro, yet function more effectively in a pro-inflammatory in vivo environment. CD317 promotes an immune response through stimulating activation of NFκB (103) which in turn contributes to B cell development (104). MSC immunomodulation is intrinsically tied to interactions with dendritic cells (DCs), with MSCs inhibiting DC maturation, resulting in reduced migration, cytokine secretion, antigen presentation to T helper cells and cross-presentation to cytotoxic T cells (105) through interrupting entry into the cell cycle, inhibiting DC differentiation and function (106). DCs also mediate the MSC immunosuppressive effect through the induction of regulatory T cells (107, 108). Deeper analysis of the CD317pos subset of MSCs identified a heightened interferon signature that was not related to IFN-γ receptor expression levels, suggestive of constitutive IFN signaling. Pre-established, low level constitutive IFN signaling contributes to rapid pathogen responses in the innate immune system and conveys a protective effect to de novo IFN exposure in these cells (109). CD317pos MSCs, if maintained at appropriate levels, may therefore contribute to enhanced innate immunomodulation. Of interest, CD317pos MSCs may also serve as a useful tool in the investigation of host tropism in viral infection, a particularly prevalent issue with the advent of COVID-19. Indeed, the presence of BST2/CD317 on the cell surface has been shown to convey a protective effect by tethering coronavirus virions to the cell surface or intracellular membranes and decreasing budding of progeny virus (110). These cells may therefore provide an enhanced response to viral infection that facilitates tissue regeneration as well as immunomodulation. However, whilst constitutive IFN signaling may convey a protective effect to cells experiencing de novo IFN in the in vivo environment, there also exists the potential for a link between unregulated constitutive IFN signaling and tissue damage in human disease conditions including autoimmunity. It is therefore highly significant that we show the baseline gene expression levels of CD317pos MSCs aligns them with cells present in autoimmune and related conditions. In this report we characterize a subset of human MSCs that favor immunomodulatory interactions over tissue regeneration, yet identify as MSCs through both independent tests (e.g. Rohart) and ISCT guidelines (111). These cells display a distinct immune profile and operate in contrast to the expectations of MSC’s immunosuppressive function. Further in vivo investigation is necessary to elucidate the probability of pro-inflammatory outcomes when using CD317pos MSCs as a therapeutic. We have demonstrated that the proportion of CD317pos MSCs varies considerably between donor MSC preparations, which could reflect individual inflammatory state and/or infection history. We propose that the success of therapeutic applications for tissue regeneration may be associated with the numbers of CD317pos MSCs present in the administered cell dose. There is also the possibility that CD317pos MSCs can bring therapeutic benefits in the inflamed environment. The expression of CD317 on MSCs serves as a positive marker for cells that display all the characteristics of an immune stromal cell and targeted therapies should aim to harness the knowledge of this cell type as novel approaches to the treatment of degenerative, and inflammatory conditions.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: ProteomeXchange, accession no: PXD033565.

Ethics Statement

All work conducted at the University of York was reviewed and approved by the University of York Department of Biology Ethics Committee and Animal Welfare Ethical Review Body, with in vivo peritonitis experiments conducted in accordance with the Animals and Scientific Procedures Act 1986, under UK Home Office Licence (project licence number PPL PFB579996). Skin samples for the human skin explant model conducted by Newcastle University were obtained with written informed consent and reviewed and approved by the National Research Ethics Service Research Ethics Committee North East (REC14/NE/1136, NRES Committee North East, IRAS project ID 129780). The in vivo tissue forming assay procedures were reviewed and approved by the University of Leeds Ethics Committee and conducted under the UK Home Office Project License (PPL:70/8549).

Author Contributions

AGK designed, performed and analyzed T cell experiments. AGK and JPH designed, performed and analyzed peritonitis experiments. APS designed, performed and analyzed MSC localisation experiments. JMF, SR and SJ designed, performed and analyzed ELISA, Interferon signature, Rohart testing, cell migration experiments and bioinformatics. XBY and EK performed subcutaneous HA scaffold implantation in vivo whilst AGK performed the associated cell culture and analysis of explants. PGG designed experiments and was responsible for conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision and writing (review and editing). X-NW designed, performed and analyzed the in vitro skin explant model. AGK, JMF and PGG wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version

Funding

This work was funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) United Kingdom, Doctoral Training Partnership grant (BB/M011151/1) and the Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Therapies Centre Versus Arthritis (21156). LK and XBY are partially funded by funding by the ‘EPSRC CDT in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine’ at the University of Leeds (Grant number EP/L014823/1). The York Centre of Excellence in Mass Spectrometry was created thanks to a major capital investment through Science City York, supported by Yorkshire Forward with funds from the Northern Way Initiative, and subsequent support from EPSRC (EP/K039660/1; EP/M028127/1) that aided the efforts of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  107 in total

1.  Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.

Authors:  M Dominici; K Le Blanc; I Mueller; I Slaper-Cortenbach; Fc Marini; Ds Krause; Rj Deans; A Keating; Dj Prockop; Em Horwitz
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.414

2.  Precursors for fibroblasts in different populations of hematopoietic cells as detected by the in vitro colony assay method.

Authors:  A J Friedenstein; U F Deriglasova; N N Kulagina; A F Panasuk; S F Rudakowa; E A Luriá; I A Ruadkow
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or nonspecific mitogenic stimuli.

Authors:  Massimo Di Nicola; Carmelo Carlo-Stella; Michele Magni; Marco Milanesi; Paolo D Longoni; Paola Matteucci; Salvatore Grisanti; Alessandro M Gianni
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated immunosuppression occurs via concerted action of chemokines and nitric oxide.

Authors:  Guangwen Ren; Liying Zhang; Xin Zhao; Guangwu Xu; Yingyu Zhang; Arthur I Roberts; Robert Chunhua Zhao; Yufang Shi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Preserved β-cell function in type 1 diabetes by mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Per-Ola Carlsson; Erik Schwarcz; Olle Korsgren; Katarina Le Blanc
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 9.461

6.  Human mesenchymal stem cells suppress donor CD4(+) T cell proliferation and reduce pathology in a humanized mouse model of acute graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  L M Tobin; M E Healy; K English; B P Mahon
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Safety of intrathecal autologous adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with ALS.

Authors:  Nathan P Staff; Nicolas N Madigan; Jonathan Morris; Mark Jentoft; Eric J Sorenson; Greg Butler; Dennis Gastineau; Allan Dietz; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  Viruses and Autoimmunity: A Review on the Potential Interaction and Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Maria K Smatti; Farhan S Cyprian; Gheyath K Nasrallah; Asmaa A Al Thani; Ruba O Almishal; Hadi M Yassine
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  BST2/CD317 counteracts human coronavirus 229E productive infection by tethering virions at the cell surface.

Authors:  Shiu-Mei Wang; Kuo-Jung Huang; Chin-Tien Wang
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.616

10.  A molecular classification of human mesenchymal stromal cells.

Authors:  Florian Rohart; Elizabeth A Mason; Nicholas Matigian; Rowland Mosbergen; Othmar Korn; Tyrone Chen; Suzanne Butcher; Jatin Patel; Kerry Atkinson; Kiarash Khosrotehrani; Nicholas M Fisk; Kim-Anh Lê Cao; Christine A Wells
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.