| Literature DB >> 35734069 |
Federico Soldati1, Karma Lambercy1, Christian Simon1.
Abstract
Background: Recovery of swallowing in patients treated with trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) is in general considered as favorable. However, patients afflicted with a secondary primary carcinoma of the head and neck may be more vulnerable to swallowing dysfunctions after trans-oral surgery as a consequence of previous treatments.Entities:
Keywords: TORS; second primary; squamous cell carcinoma; survival; swallow function; transoral robotic surgery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734069 PMCID: PMC9194978 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.795
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ISSN: 2378-8038
Patient characteristics
| Variables | Number of patients (%) | |
|---|---|---|
|
Age, years median 62 years, range 46–78 years | <65 | 13 (72) |
| >65 | 5(28) | |
| Sex | Male | 16 (89) |
| Female | 2 (11) | |
| Number of primary squamous cell carcinomas | 1 | 9 (50) |
| 2 | 2 (11) | |
| 3 | 2 (11) | |
| 4+ | 5 (28) | |
| Site | Tonsil | 7 (39) |
| Base‐of‐tongue | 6 (33) | |
| Soft palate | 2 (11) | |
| Posterior pharynx | 1 (6) | |
| Supraglottic larynx | 2 (11) | |
| cT staging | T1 | 14 (78) |
| T2 | 4 (22) | |
| T3–T4 | 0 (0) | |
| cN staging | N0 | 17 (94) |
| N1 | 1 (8) | |
| N2 | 0 (0) | |
| N3 | 0 (0) | |
| pT staging | Tis | 3 (17) |
| T1 | 9 (50) | |
| T2 | 6 (33) | |
| T3‐T4 | 0 (0) | |
| pN staging | No neck dissection | 14 (78) |
| N0 | 3 (17) | |
| N1 | 1 (5) | |
| N2 | 0 (0) | |
| N3 | 0 (0) | |
| M staging | M0 | 18 (100) |
| M1 | 0 (0) | |
| HPV‐status | p16 positive | 4 (22) |
| p16 negative | 12 (67) | |
| p16 unknown | 2 (11) | |
| Margin status | R0, >5 mm | 6 (33) |
| R0, ≥3 mm | 7 (39) | |
| R0, >1 mm | 4 (22) | |
| R0, 1 mm | 1(6) | |
| Adjuvant treatment | Radiation | 1 (6) |
| Chemo‐radiation | 0 (0) | |
| No treatment | 17 (94) | |
| NG, days | No NG | 4 (22) |
| <8 | 7 (39) | |
| 7–14 | 5 (28) | |
| >14 | 2 (11) | |
| PEG feeding | Long‐term | 1 (5) |
| Short‐term | 3 (17) | |
FIGURE 1Swallowing outcome comparing pre‐ and post‐TORS FOSS scores. Wilcoxon signed rank test did not show a significant difference (p < 0.05)
FIGURE 2Survival of patients: (A) Overall survival (OS); (B) Disease Free Survival (DFS); and (C) Disease Specific Survival (DSS)