| Literature DB >> 35733827 |
So Fujimoto1, Takashi Agari1, Takashi Komori2, Keisuke Takai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal lipomas sometimes involve various ectopic tissues originating from the ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm in the process of morphological development. OBSERVATIONS: A 29-year-old male patient with myolipoma of the conus medullaris at the S2 and S3 levels was described. The unusual finding, involuntary muscle contraction, was presented in an operative video and a literature review. In the present case, sacral myolipoma with involuntary contraction caused tethered cord syndrome in adulthood, and untethering surgery resolved continuous buttock and leg pain. LESSONS: This rare finding is considered a surgical indication for adult patients with myolipoma.Entities:
Keywords: MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; lipoma; lipomeningocele; lipomyelomeningocele; neural tube defect; spina bifida; spinal dysraphism
Year: 2022 PMID: 35733827 PMCID: PMC9204932 DOI: 10.3171/CASE2298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosurg Case Lessons ISSN: 2694-1902
FIG. 1.Preoperative sagittal T1- (A) and T2-weighted (B) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing a low-lying conus medullaris due to a high-intensity mass dorsal to the conus at the S2 and S3 levels. Postoperative sagittal T1- (C) and T2-weighted (D) MRI showing untethering of the spinal cord as well as partial removal of the myolipoma.
FIG. 2.A: Intraoperative photograph showing ectopic muscle tissue. B: Hematoxylin and eosin stain showing mature striated skeletal muscle and adipose tissue with mild perivascular inflammation. Original magnification ×10.
Clinical characteristics of cases of lumbosacral myolipoma with muscle contraction
| Authors & Year | Age | Sex | Symptoms | Level | Lipoma Type | Striated Muscle | Contraction | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knierim et al., 1987[ | 1 mo | M | Lumbosacral mass | L4–S1 | Conus & filum | Intratumoral | Stimulation-induced | No change |
| Brown & Shaver, 2000[ | 18 yrs | M | Urological | S2 | Filum | Intratumoral | Stimulation-induced | Amelioration of urological symptoms |
| Shimizu et al., 2014[ | 18 yrs | M | Urological, pain | S1–3 | Conus | Intratumoral | Stimulation-induced | Attenuation of pain |
| Iliescu et al., 2015[ | 26 yrs | M | Urological, motor, sensory | S3–5 | Conus | Extratumoral | Stimulation-induced | Amelioration of all symptoms |
| Present case | 29 yrs | M | Urological, motor, pain | S2–3 | Conus | Extratumoral | Involuntary | Attenuation of pain |