| Literature DB >> 35733567 |
Xuan Gao1,2, Yuan Qi2,3, Yong Chai1,2, Chun Lei3,4, Jiefei Wang1.
Abstract
Based on the concept of "smart tourism," this paper designs and implements a tourism management information system based on PSO-optimized NN. The foreground tourism web page of the system adopts DIV + CSS mode for page planning and layout, PHP as the client script language, and SQL server as the database to store and analyze user information. At the same time, the system adds personalized components to the user's search ranking results, so that the routes and scenic spots presented in front of users in the result interface are more in line with users' consumption habits. In order to verify the performance of the model and algorithm constructed in this paper, several experiments were carried out in this paper. Experimental results show that the prediction accuracy of this algorithm is 94.67% and the recall rate is 96.11%. This algorithm can overcome the disadvantages of traditional algorithms and provide some effective suggestions for tourism management. At the same time, this paper applies the concept of "smart tourism" to specific tourism informatization, which can promote the transformation and upgrading of tourism industry structure and further enhance the overall development level of tourism industry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35733567 PMCID: PMC9208917 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6386360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1NN structure.
Figure 2PSO optimization NN algorithm flow.
Settings of simulation test environment parameters.
| Serial number | Test parameters | Set up |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hidden layer | One |
| 2 | CPU | 4 nuclear |
| 3 | RAM | 64 GN |
| 4 | Hard disc | 1T |
| 5 | Display card | 512G |
| 6 | Operating system | Windows |
Figure 3Training results of different networks.
Figure 4Comparison of recall rates of different algorithms.
Figure 5Comparison of prediction accuracy of different algorithms.
Test index values of different methods.
| Algorithm | MSE | RMSE | MAE | MAPE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Convolution algorithm | 0.154 | 0.499 | 0.803 | 0.614 |
| BPNN algorithm | 0.108 | 0.279 | 0.627 | 0.512 |
| Traditional ANN algorithm | 0.094 | 0.301 | 0.614 | 0.487 |
| Improved PSO algorithm | 0.057 | 0.213 | 0.551 | 0.369 |
Figure 6Running time results of different systems.
Figure 7Stability test of different systems.