Literature DB >> 35732958

Larger sagittal inter-screw distance/tibial width ratio reduces delayed union or non-union after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Suguru Yokoo1,2, Kenta Saiga3, Koji Demiya1,4, Hideki Ohashi1,5, Masahiro Horita1,6, Toshifumi Ozaki1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has risks of complications, such as delayed union and non-union. The number and direction of the inserted screws have been reported as important factors affecting the time to union of AAA. However, the ratio of inter-screw distance (ISD) to tibial width (TW) in different planes has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of this ratio on bone union following AAA.
METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 63 patients (64 ankles) undergoing AAA from 2013 to 2019. Then, their age, body mass index (BMI), sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) status, Takakura-Tanaka classification, number of screws and radiographic parameters were analysed.
RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 70.3 (range, 45-91) years. Bone fusion was achieved in 57 ankles (89%) in a mean period of 3.3 (range, 2-6) postoperative months. There were four cases of delayed union and three of non-union. No significant differences in age, BMI, sex, DM, Takakura-Tanaka classification, and number of screws could be detected between the groups. However, the sagittal ISD/TW ratio was significantly larger in the union group than in the delayed/non-union group with a cut-off value of 57.0%.
CONCLUSION: Larger sagittal ISD/TW ratios result in reduced post-AAA delayed union or non-union. The surgeon should be aware that the anterior and posterior screw widths should be approximately 60% or more of the anteroposterior width of the tibia.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis; Coronal ratio; Delayed union; Inter-screw distance; Non-union; Sagittal ratio; Tibial width

Year:  2022        PMID: 35732958     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03307-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  7 in total

1.  The outcome of arthroscopic and open surgery ankle arthrodesis: a comparative retrospective study on 107 patients.

Authors:  Kristian Kibak Nielsen; Frank Linde; Niels Christian Jensen
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 2.705

2.  Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: are results reproducible irrespective of pre-operative deformity?

Authors:  Z Dannawi; D H Nawabi; A Patel; J J H Leong; D J Moore
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.705

Review 3.  Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Anna O Elmlund; Ian G Winson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.653

4.  Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Bo Jun Woo; Mun Chun Lai; Sean Ng; Inderjeet Singh Rikhraj; Kevin Koo
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.705

5.  Influence of fixation with two vs. three screws on union of arthroscopic tibio-talar arthrodesis: Comparative radiographic study of 111 cases.

Authors:  T Goetzmann; D Molé; S Jullion; O Roche; F Sirveaux; A Jacquot
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a compressive retrograde nail: A retrospective study of 59 nails.

Authors:  A E Thomas; P M Guyver; J M Taylor; M Czipri; N J Talbot; I T Sharpe
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.705

7.  Initial stability and stress distribution of ankle arthroscopic arthrodesis with three kinds of 2-screw configuration fixation: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Cheng-Song Yuan; Zhong-Min Jin; Yun-Jiao Wang; You-Xing Shi; Zhi-Jin Yang; Kanglai Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.